• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

U.N approves Sending 26,000 troops to Darfur

There's going to be genocide in Africa and the middle east, it's not our job to be the crusades of the world. If you're so pro-save Darfur why don't you join the UN military?

where else is genocide happening right now?

I don't see why intervention is being discouraged.

It's a thousand times worse than 9-11. But it's cool because they're not Americans.

That's like not helping a child in a fire because he doesn't share your nationality.
 
Really, Shadowboxing? It would be okay to allow government-sponsored mass murder, as long as it didn't hurt anyone outside that country? My mind, it is boggled.
 
We're not the one's who are killing people in Darfur.

I don't think I said or implied you were.
and frankly I don't see how that is relevant to the issue.
a paramedic seldom causes the injury he tries to heal.
a cop seldom prosecutes crimes he himself committed.
it's really not about that.
 
where else is genocide happening right now?

I don't see why intervention is being discouraged.

It's a thousand times worse than 9-11. But it's cool because they're not Americans.

That's like not helping a child in a fire because he doesn't share your nationality.

Are you willing to die to save people in Darfur? Unless you're willing to join you've got no business ranting on how we should help out. You people remind me of this chick who was talking about how we should reinstate the draft. :whatever:
 
Are you willing to die to save people in Darfur? Unless you're willing to join you've got no business ranting on how we should help out. You people remind me of this chick who was talking about how we should reinstate the draft. :whatever:
I'm willing to die in Darfur if it helps to stop genocide.

What good is our military if it cannot be used to stop mass genocide? What good is our society if no one cares?

We don't deserve power and security if we don't care about the genocide of women and children.
 
When's the last time the US military was used to protect our borders?

The Mexican-American War in the 1800's.

Everyone in the military knows most wars are fought overseas. They fight for American interests, and intervening in genocide is in America's best interest. It gives us moral authority which helps America in more ways than the isolationist can possibly imagine.
 
Everyone in the military knows most wars are fought overseas. They fight for American interests, and intervening in genocide is in America's best interest. It gives us moral authority which helps America in more ways than the isolationist can possibly imagine.

Care to elaborate? Your post sounds cute on paper but I don't see how our obsession with being the crusaders or right accomplishes anything for us. We weren't appointed as the planet police.
 
It's not about being "planet police", it's about doing the right thing.
 
I sure hope no one means to argue that the UN should sit back while innocent people are being slaughtered.:huh:
 
I sure hope no one means to argue that the UN should sit back while innocent people are being slaughtered.:huh:

I think that's exactly what Kritish is saying.
 
This will make Somalia look like a successful operation. When will America learn that it isn't the self-appointed world police?

This is a completely different situation to Iraq.

Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, are actually dying. The world NEEDS to do something about it. The world leaders on the anniversary of the holocaust not long ago swore they would never let it happen again. Its happening again, and they're taking their sweet time doing something about it, because the US and Britain are wasting their time in Iraq.
 
I don't approve in meddling in other counties affairs unless they're a threat. I don't care how bad they're acting.

And where did that attitude get the US in World War II? Didn't bother getting involved until you were actually attacked :whatever:
 
There is tons of mass genocide and atrocious in various pockets of the world. Sorry, I don't think it's our job to stop all of it.

These kinds of posts just scream "I have no idea whats going on in Darfur, but I'm going to post my opinion anyway".

Whats happening in Darfur is the biggest humanitarian crisis going on in the world at the moment. Its been happening for a few years. Its WAY more urgent than pissing around in Iraq.
 
A quick reference for people who are pro world police...

Kosovo: Revealed how big of a **** up Clinton was...complete disaster
Somalia: Another disaster

The troops we're losing in Iraq must not be enough.

What part of this is a UN operation, not a US one are you not getting. The article hasn't stated which country will send the majority of troops.

Chances are that due to America's capabilities bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq, most of the peacekeepers will come from places such as France, Pakistan, Italy, etc.
 

To just blame the United States for Africa and the Middle East's problems is just ignorant. The imperial European powers did much more to screw them over than the United States has. They were the ones who drew the borders. They were the ones who drained them of their resources. They were the ones who left prematurely.

Sure the United States took part in screwing them over, most particularly the Middle East, but what Europe did is practically a crime.
 
This is a completely different situation to Iraq.

Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, are actually dying. The world NEEDS to do something about it. The world leaders on the anniversary of the holocaust not long ago swore they would never let it happen again. Its happening again, and they're taking their sweet time doing something about it, because the US and Britain are wasting their time in Iraq.

Actually nothing has been done for quite sometime in Darfur is because most of the world just simply pretended to care instead of actually caring and veto-wielding China pretty much allowed it to happen.
 
Everyone in the military knows most wars are fought overseas. They fight for American interests, and intervening in genocide is in America's best interest. It gives us moral authority which helps America in more ways than the isolationist can possibly imagine.

Do you think that providing America moral authority is any one of the purposes for the military. As much as I support action to prevent more killing in Darfur, you're just flat out wrong on preventing genocide is in America's best interests.

Everytime America has been to war it was to gain independence, self-defense, or in the name of American interests. That is the purpose of the military and it will always stay that way
 
Are the UN still in the sex slave buisness or have those wacky pranksters stopped those shenninagans?
 
about time the UN pulled their fingers out their ass and started doing something in Darfur.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,263
Messages
22,074,749
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"