hammerhedd11
OHaiMark
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2004
- Messages
- 7,640
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
What happened to Luke?
Because the writers are bad writers. They established the healing blood earlier in the series without regard for the consequences to future storylines. Now that they want someone to actually stay dead, they and the characters they write are forced to act as if the healing blood doesn't exist. It's pathetic.When the big event happens on season 3's finale, why didn't they use Claire's blood to bring him back from the dead, like they did for Noah?
For me, stories have to make sense, otherwise I get severely irritated. It's just how I am. I can't turn it off. I feel like if the writers want me to go on this journey through their story, the least they can do is have it make sense. It's really not hard. I think I just have very high standards when it comes to internal consistency, and I don't think I am willing to lower them for any show. Also, the more I like a show in the beginning, the harder I am on the show when it comes to this stuff. I really, really liked Heroes, once upon a time. That's why I have no problem ripping it to shreds now that I think it's taken a bad turn.The best way to watch Heroes is to expect no sense out of the stories (ie healing blood) and just go with whatever happens.
This is where I will defend the show. I don't think they ever intended Angela to have a persuasion power. I think there were too many fans reading too much into things. First off, she was never that persuasive. No one ever listened to her for long, so if she was supposed to have persuasion, the writers failed to ever have her be very successful.i also think they kinda changed Angela Petrelli's powers. Maybe im wrong here but they basically made her look like she had a power of persuasion or something in the first few seasons, then suddenly it turned into this dream power crappola.
This is where I will defend the show. I don't think they ever intended Angela to have a persuasion power. I think there were too many fans reading too much into things. First off, she was never that persuasive. No one ever listened to her for long, so if she was supposed to have persuasion, the writers failed to ever have her be very successful.
Second, a lot of people made a big deal about Angela getting close to Nathan's wife, Heidi, and putting her hands all over her when she was trying to get Heidi to keep her mouth shut concerning the stuff Nathan said to her after the explosion, but all that touching was never in the script. It was improvised by the actress who plays Angela and the director of that episode. It was never a part of any power.
She always struck me as someone who was just very good at manipulating people, but not through the use of any superpower. If her power was ever persuasion, she should have been much better at it. That doesn't mean I think they originally intended to give Angela the dream power though. I think Angela was not supposed to be that major of a character in the beginning, but then the actress and character became popular. I wouldn't be surprised if they gave her the dream power as an afterthought.
I remember Peter's early dreams, and you may be right. I could see it going either way. I think the writers sometimes throw ideas into the show without having a clear idea where they are going. Basically, I'm not inclined to give the writers the benefit of the doubt.I actually think they did intend on her having the precognitive dreaming power because back in season 1 Peter said that he dreamed Nathan getting in the car crash and when he woke up he got the call that he was in a car crash. This makes sense because this was the first ability that Peter absorbed, and it obviously came from Angela.