Electro UK
Can't all be for nothing
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2004
- Messages
- 14,285
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 58
I think 3 is just as good as 2, though I personally prefer 2... too. My biggest problem with 3 is the unanswered questions.
I stayed away from previews and thought the 2nd was better. The story telling was just better there. UC3 was great but I can't say it was the best in the series bc the second game holds that honor for meI know there's still the debate of whether the third one is better than the second, but I don't think anyone can deny that it was a great game on its own. And personally, I think it all depends on how much you knew/saw about the game before you play it, because had I not seen most of the bigger moments beforehand, I would've definitely been more blown away.
But Oscorp said it was easily the best game ever made.
I'm still addicted to the multiplayer.
Good point, they really upped the stakes in the last one.One thing Ive kinda felt about the series is that the first two games seem to be a bit of serious parodies of actions films, while the third one tries to actually be one. I mean that in terms of the games overall, with the story and score. I felt like the presentation of the third one, even going back to the first trailer, was trying to go for this epic blockbuster kind of tone.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/11/07/uncharted-fight-for-fortune-unintentionally-announcedUncharted: Fight For Fortune Unintentionally Announced
Thank you, Australian Classifications Board.
It looks like PlayStation gamers will be getting more Nathan Drake. Why? Because the Australian Classifications Board seems to have unveiled a new game in the Uncharted series.
Multiple sources have reported on the seemingly unintentional reveal, most notably GameSpot, which was re-Tweeted by Sony executive Shuhei Yoshida, all but verifying that the game is real.
So what does the classification listing tell us? Well, quite a bit, as it turns out.
For starters, the publisher, not surprisingly, is Sony Computer Entertainment, which owns the Uncharted franchise. Whats strange here is that the developer of Fight For Fortune is a studio One Loop Games. The Uncharted trilogy on PlayStation 3, as well as the PlayStation Vita iteration in the series, were developed in-house by Sony-owned developers Naughty Dog and Sony Bend, respectively. It appears this entry will leave the first party development stable.
One Loop Games website shows a picture of both an Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. The company claims its team has over 30 years of interactive entertainment experience behind it, with projects having appeared on XBLA, PSN, and elsewhere. Interestingly, the studio worked on God of War: Betrayal and Ratchet & Clank: Going Commando, indicating it already has a relationship with Sony. The studio also had a hand in the development of consoles games like Full Spectrum Warrior and The Saboteur.
The rating also indicates that Fight For Fortune may not be your typical Uncharted game. Australian games are rated in six categories: Themes, Violence, Language, Drug Use, Nudity and Sex. Each of those categories can be ranked from none to high impact, with four other classifications in between. Fight For Fortune scores a none in Themes, Language, Nudity and Sex, with very mild impact, the next step up from none, in Violence and Drug Use. (Its overall rating -- G -- indicates a "General" game with "content... very mild in impact.")
Now, Drake and his friends have never been known for running around naked or using drugs -- so there are no surprises on that front -- but the four Uncharted games have, so far, relied a great deal on death-by-gun. So perhaps Fight For Fortune is something that deviates from the Uncharted formula. We'll have to wait and see.
Interestingly, the game is also listed as being multi-platform. Since Sony owns Uncharted and is publishing the game, this could very well indicate that Fight For Fortune is a cross-play game PS3/Vita game. Or perhaps its a PS3/next-gen game. Again, we'll have to wait and see.
Weve reached out to Sony for official comment, and will update when we hear back.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/11/07/uncharted-fight-for-fortune-unintentionally-announcedUpdate: The eagle-eyed members of NeoGAF have struck again; Uncharted: Fight for Fortune has also received classification in Brazil, where it was classed as a "casino/card game" and listed for the PlayStation Vita. Original story and information follows.