The Amazing Spider-Man "unresolved things" speculation

1.- Gwen, imo will die in the film where GG appears obviously but she defently is.. i mean Capt. Stacy warned peter it could be fitting
2.-Connors knows Osborn killed the Parkers that is also a reason why he was distant to Peter because he was envolved
3.-i think Osborn will make a mix of crossed species and it would end up looking something like a Goblin or just cures him but he becomes MAD! i think they´ll go with a mix of Ultimate gobby and 616

 

This is very unfortunate for me. I'd love to see Osborn's realisation.

 

This made me think of what Ben's saying at the end of the movie... "You've been living with so many unresolved things." *shot of Ben's killer's wanted poster, picture of Peter's parents*... I don't think that was a coincidence.

 

Honestly no idea, but can't wait to find out.

Indeed. Even if it's not and is somebody under "Norman's employ" (as Rhys said, lol) you still get the impression that the man and Norman know who Peter really is.

Yeah. Connors did seem very guilty at times when he was talking about Richard/when Ratha was talking to him about Richard, so I think that Connors was somehow involved in his death.

I don't think that Richard experimented on Peter for Oscorp or anything like that, I mean this is a guy who abandons his kid JUST so he could keep him safe. I have 2 theories about this, Richard does something to Peter (to protect him) should Peter ever get "exposed" to Richard's work, the powers are a side-effect. Nothing intended.

OR...

Richard was forced to experiment on himself (possibly under pressure from Osborn), down the line he meets Mary and they have Peter, Richard passes something that he had in his DNA, or an altered version of it or something to Peter unknowingly.

I mean there was dialogue in the game that states Peter wasn't exactly completely normal before the bite either, Connors says something along the lines of "There was something in your blood that saved you."... I'm assuming this wasn't pulled out of the gamemakers asses, considering the game ended up using plot elements from the movie that were scrapped from the movie itself (the Lizard or Ratha's bio states that Ratha was killed by the Lizard).

Again, no idea, lol, but I'm excited to find out... and read theories, of course.

Anyways nice job on making this thread, it's nice to have a thread that isn't just complaining along the lines of "THEY DIDN'T ANSWER ANYTHING, WAT WAS DA UNTOLD STORY? WHY DOES THIS MOVIE EXIST?"...

 

Not trying to derail the topic, but what about the other unresolved things? Like Dr.Ratha and the Lizard scene? I'm not here to complain, I'm just curious as to everyone's ideas of what would have happened in that scene?

 

Yeah, I don't think that was a coincidence as well.

 

1.- Deleted scene!
2.- they gave out all the mystery from that scne and they are saving it for a sequel

 

Imo, I think they wanted to use Ratha for the sequel even if they wanted to kill him as he could play a "middle man" between Norman Osborn and Peter Parker in a sequel.

 

that´s a little problem i have with TASM we don´t know if he survived , bridge scene and then he is gone , did capt. Stacy said if there were any deaths or just injured in the scene?
i´ll chack it when it comes out in bluray

 

Yeah, well, maybe Richard experimented on himself because he didn't want to put anybody else in danger? Somewhat heroic, I guess. lol

 

Personally I think Peter was going to be given the choice by Ratha or Connors between being a hero and stopping the Lizard or learning some truth about his parents. Probably some implication that the cops could handle the Lizard and then Peter decides to be the hero.

My theory is the story is going to kind of follow the ultimate venom story where Richard Parker used his own DNA in the cross species experiments (rather than to make the ultimate symbiote).

Its pretty clear theres a lot of things in common here.

Ultimate: Richard is working on a cure for cancer.
AMS: Richard is working on a cure for an unknown disease.

Ultimate:The cure bonds and reacts to Peter and Eddie because it was made with their parents DNA.
AMS: Peters DNA for some reason caused him to become the perfect cross-species.

Ultimate: Richard and Mary had to go away because of their work on the cure and left Peter with May and Ben.
AMS: Richard and Mary were threatened because of his work and had to hide Peter with May and Ben.

Ultimate: Richard and Mary Died in a plane crash.
AMS: Richard and Mary Died in a plane crash.

I'd say it's a safe bet we're going to see this culminate in AMS version of Venom.

 

I think they likely dropped the Ratha sub-plot because it tied into the whole "Ang-Hulk" storyline of how Peter's dad experimented on him,thus making him "fated" to be Spider-Man.Smarter heads probably realised at the last minute that wasn't the wisest direction to take,thus editing it out.

I doubt we'll see Ratha again.

 

I don't think it'll be a full blown cancer suit but I think it's going to follow the ultimate parents story.

EDIT: I think that Richard used his DNA to make the cross species process, but something happened and he decided against continuing it. Peter being his son and having half his genetics, was able to survive the cross Species Spider-Bite because of this.

 

It would also explain why the shadowy figure has an interest in Peter and might know he's Spider-Man.

 

Are people honestly going to hate it if we find out that Richard either passed something down to Peter, or if Richard did something to Peter to protect him in case he got exposed to his work?

 

i would like to see Osborn trying to get Peter by blackmailing him about his parents and /or Gwen´s safety (not May because they did it in SM1)

 

Yeah, the only way I'd be fine with having Peter altered, is if it was either done to protect him... or well, if it was something passed down from Richard. Nothing else.

Or the theory that Richard used his own DNA in the cross-species stuff, I wouldn't mind that either.

 

Nice thread, pr0xy! I remember when fans were freaking out because of the origin change thing. I don't think it would necessarily be Ang Lee-ing the origin. Here are some scenarios on the origin change:

-Richard tested the formula on himself before he met Mary. When they had Peter, some of Richard's DNA that was exposed to the formula was inherited by Peter, if you will, which is the reason why Peter didn't die from the bite.

-Richard wanted Peter to be able to with stand disease and infections. So he injected him with the formula, but it did nothing. Not until he was bit by the spider. Which would mean that the formula only works if it has something mixed into it. Spider venom, lizard blood, scorpion venom, etc.

I would go with using the 1st scenario. It makes more sense.

If Peter was born with the formula born in his system, it wouldn't mean that he would have enhanced abilities. I feel like that's what fans are worried about that he was already super before the bite. Well there wrong, obviously.

In conclusion to my thoughts, I am completely okay with an origin change. I'm sorta glad they didn't have the changed origin explained in this movie. It would give the sequels more climaxes. Sequels are always the best chance to explain things.