Why on earth would Stark become Director of SHIELD? MCU Stark is nothing like 616 Stark in terms of politics and philosophy. MCU Stark hates SHIELD, and everyone in it. Not to mention that he does not and has not ever worked for SHIELD in the MCU.
Which is what would make it such a fascinating storyline progression
Which is what would make it such a fascinating storyline progression
Storyline progression requires *progress*. There has been *none* in that direction, thus a plot wherein it suddenly happens is out of nowhere and bad writing.
If by "fascinating," you mean "totally out of character, boring and counterintuitive," then yeah, I could see it. People pay good money to see Iron Man repulsor-blast stuff to kingdom come, not Tony Stark doing a Power Point presentation at staff meetings.
Not sure what films you're watching but I've seen significant progress between Iron Man 1 and The Avengers. And he's still not there yet but by the time we get to Avengers 3 he might be.
I dunno, seems like people enjoy RDJ's humor and attitude just as much, if not more, than the "repulsor-blasting". Especially if you've got a dozen other characters that can do that.
There's exactly one other character that can fire repulsors, so I'm not sure where you're getting a dozen.
As for Director of SHIELD: I see no evidence of a "story progression" anywhere in the Iron Man or Avenger movies that point towards Tony taking on that role at some point.
If anything, *Steve Rogers* is far more likely to assume that role by the end of CATWS than Tony Stark. He's actually got the chops and experience within the agency, as well as the level-headedness and leadership qualities to be promoted to the Directorate. That could very well be what Joe Russo was implying when he talked about "a very big shift at the end of this movie" for the MCU.

Tony alone has access to all of SHIELD's secrets. Tony alone has been known to run a large organization with loose ties to the military. Tony is the only one whose walked onto the helicarrier and stared giving orders and trying to figure out how Fury runs things. Him being anti-establishment doesn't prevent him from giving orders in establishments, or else he wouldn't have a huge company. It'd be a good story... too bad there's not a comic book story to draw from on that issue.![]()
There may not be any more Iron Man movies for some time. I don't want WM disappearing for years just because there's no IM movie, he should appear somewhere else. I still think that Falcon is much morel likely to appear in AOU than WM.To me, I feel like War Machine should just continue as a supporting character in the Iron Man movies.
At least a Cameo of War Machine would be Cool.
Rhodey, you show up JUST after all the fighting/danger is over, but in plenty of time to join the after party, very clever of you.

I read the comic, I was just making a joke. The whole "miss the fighting, but eat the food" is too obvious not to make fun of.In Rhodes' defense, if you read that IM3 prequel, Tony Stark is the reason that WM doesn't show up until the fighting is over.![]()
I don't know how accurate this is, but it says he "has a part to film in the next Avengers movie."
