I'm from London and I just finished watching The Avengers(fantastic superhero ensemble film by the way).
One thing that really bugged me was the absence of War Machine.Fair enough, due to the already high budget and the already large cast, having War Machine in the film would probably unbalance the story and I accept that. However, they could have least mentioned or alluded to War Machine's existence. I mean the film managed to cameo Pepper Potts and mention Jane Foster.
It would have been great if in the battle in New York, Tony Stark would have tried to contact War Machine or at least have mentioned his name. For example, Stark could have said: "Why did Rhodey have to be on army training. Sure could use his help right now" Understandably, War Machine(James Rhodes) is part of the army but I don't see why War Machine wouldn't have least been contacted by SHIELD or mentioned. It's just a little thing i fount a bit jarring in an otherwise superior superhero ensemble.
Thoughts?
One thing that really bugged me was the absence of War Machine.Fair enough, due to the already high budget and the already large cast, having War Machine in the film would probably unbalance the story and I accept that. However, they could have least mentioned or alluded to War Machine's existence. I mean the film managed to cameo Pepper Potts and mention Jane Foster.
It would have been great if in the battle in New York, Tony Stark would have tried to contact War Machine or at least have mentioned his name. For example, Stark could have said: "Why did Rhodey have to be on army training. Sure could use his help right now" Understandably, War Machine(James Rhodes) is part of the army but I don't see why War Machine wouldn't have least been contacted by SHIELD or mentioned. It's just a little thing i fount a bit jarring in an otherwise superior superhero ensemble.
Thoughts?