The hardcore comic nerds won't win this battle. Nolan wants a film that is realistic and appeals to the masses, not comic freaks. I really don't want the Joker to look like he does in the comics, it clashes with the Nolan look and feel. I think he's going to wear street cloths and no lip stick.
Trying to use Nolan's version to justify an overly violent and realistic Batman?
I think that's kinda an odd thing to say. I mean, we already got an overly vioent Batman before. And a violent Batman isn't anything new, either.
Gee, i didnt know there have been R rated batman films where the villains are uber violent and realistic to the point that only 18 year olds can watch it. Are you saying that B89 and BR were overly violent? LMAO.
In my time on these boards, i've heard people ask to do away with the comic interpretation of joker and make him a cliche serial killer, all while saying it would fit nolans vision. It's not an odd thing to say at all, as most of nolans supporters dont understand what nolans trying to do. He's not being as realistic as people think. The reality of it is, alot of nolan supporters, imo, basically want arnofsky's YO without all the extreme changes to bruces origin.
It's odd, how people act like Batman Begins is a documentary or something. I think it creates a giant rift between the Batman Begins fans and the outsiders...b/c THOSE fans seem to scare the christ out of people questioning TDK.
And, your right....there are people who are kinda selling Nolan short just b/c they think they get what he's doing.
Batman Begins has a sense of realism. But, it's not realistic. There's a lot of fantasy going on there.
Exactly. The latter is the best. He grounded the new universe in reality, so when it takes a turn for the worse (whole theme of escelation) it is truly absurd and shocking.I think the realism-pushers are going to be very surprised with what Nolan does in TDK, and they'll realize he was setting them up from the get-go.
The establishment of the real world Gotham was a necessary "evil" (in the eyes of some) in order for characters like Joker to properly stun audiences.
A twisted, psychotic, comic book villain in a twisted psychotic comic book world? Great (Burton).
A twisted, psychotic comic book villain in a "normal" world? Even better (Nolan).
Well, when you say overly violent.....I'm assuming you mean as violent as a Batman CAN be. Batman isn't the Punisher. He won't cut a guy's head off with a chainsaw, or chop off a man's legs one by one. Or cut a man's throat open.
So, sorry.....I didn't know you meant The Punisher would be the Batman in what you said.
Batman killed. Alot. I thought you meant violent in that nature. He blew a guy to bits. Set a man on fire.
But, that's all fun and games, of course.
Agreed 100%.
It's odd, how people act like Batman Begins is a documentary or something. I think it creates a giant rift between the Batman Begins fans and the outsiders...b/c THOSE fans seem to scare the christ out of people questioning TDK.
And, your right....there are people who are kinda selling Nolan short just b/c they think they get what he's doing.
Batman Begins has a sense of realism. But, it's not realistic. There's a lot of fantasy going on there.
You know what sums up this post nice?
In Batman Returns... The Penguin was a sewage mutant who looked bad, smelled bad and had skid marks. Yet, such a creature, as bizzare as it was, was not such out of place in Burton's Gotham. In Nolan's Gotham, he would be put in a cage and handled with tranquilizer guns.
They were talking about "the hideous Penguin Man in the sewers". He was clearly "out of place" and clearly regarded as a freak until Shreck and the media turned him into a hero.
Guarderonimus Maximus... allow me to submit that yes, while the people in Burton's world did react negatively to Penguin's presence, he seemed to belong in that version of Gotham City. He fit there.
And you gotta admit... he played that stinkin' city like a harp from Hell.![]()
The people of Burton's Gotham have always been pretty nonchalant about letting the freaks have the run of the place.
Just ask the cops and citizens who indulged in a known serial killer's party parade. I know, "Gotham's Greed" and all, but hubba hubba hubba, money money money..what are they morons?
*dies of lol*
As much as I do *heart* Nicholson's Joker, that's a fairly accurate assesment of why I don't rate B89 as much as most people do.
Yeah, I grew up on B89 and it's very close to my heart. But for every supposed error by Nolan someone can point out, I'll see it and I'll raise them one big Burton blunder.
It's why I love when people attack the microwave emitter angle. Sure, it's silly psuedo-science, but at least its a relatively clever way of explaining how a terrorist can inconspicuously disperse a deadly toxin.
But no, that's too far-fetched. A serial murderer and his armed goons being allowed to parade through the streets with giant balloons is much more logical.
The people of Burton's Gotham have always been pretty nonchalant about letting the freaks have the run of the place.
Just ask the cops and citizens who indulged in a known serial killer's party parade. I know, "Gotham's Greed" and all, but hubba hubba hubba, money money money..what are they morons?
LOL!!!
Eh? Why do you trust Batman now? Because he apparently threw the Joker off a roof?!?!?
LOL!!!
Yes, or how about the way Batman gives Gordon the bat-signal, and Gordon, who has been wanting to arrest Batman throughout the film, is suddenly all chuffed, "we received a letter from Batman this morning!"
Because he was at home washing his tights. And they came out sparkling clean.
Gothamites are attracted to shiny things. Especially Gossip Gertie.