Oscorp
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 10,413
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 58
Oh yes. Sneaking an image of a rhinoceros into the movie so fans can sit there satisfied that they got some esoteric reference to the comics is the height of imagination.
They should concentrate and focus all their attention on actually making a decent movie this time. Leave the extraneous stuff like Easter eggs alone. Nolan and Raimi did it right.
Easter eggs, winks, nods, etc...are always lame, sometimes they're ridiculous and distracting and take you right out of the movie and they rarely serve any purpose to the story.
"Would you prefer yellow spandex?" ugh. So imaginative!
I generally agree with your view of easter eggs. That last sentence is a perfect example of easter egg done wrong. It always takes me out of the movie, because it's delivered in such an obvious *hint hint* way.
However, there can also be easter eggs that actually serve a purpose. In this universe, it seems we will be introduced to a bigger world than just "Spider-Man and one super villain". This universe seems to go in a direction where there are lots of things going on at the same time behind the scenes that might not (yet) be directly involved in Spider-Man's main battle, not noticed by Spidey himself. A world where there are several superpowered threats out there, and maybe even some heroes.
In that case, I can totally see some easter eggs being in good use: hints of what's going on around the film's main story. A hint of a guy named Quentin Beck, or a mention of the Big Man etc. just to give the viewer the sense of a "bigger world".
I don't know if such things would even count as 'easter eggs' per se, in which case this post in pretty useless.
. The point of an easter egg is that it's not obvious. It's an intentionally hidden message or subtle in joke.