You somehow think that how krypton is presented has some correlation to how clark feels about krypton...which makes NO DAMN SENSE, considering that Donner's krypton has the same cold sterile environment....and donner's Superman embraces his heritage, or else he wouldnt spend his time in the Fortress of Solitude listening to holograms of his parents
I fail to see why you're bringing up Donner? I'm not exactly a fan of that film and really not a fan of Donner's Krypton. I don't like the allusions to Jor-el being God the father.
And, yes, I do feel that how Krypton is presented impacts how Clark feels about a number of things. To paraphrase Byrne and Wolfman : "Krypton gave me these powers but Earth made me human."
Clark doesn't embrace Krypton as something to aspire to in MOS but rather as lessons learned. His heritage is exciting but in no way does it superceed his heritage on Earth. He is a citizen of our planet first and of Kryptonian descent second. I'm an American first and of Italian descent second.
Crying over relatives he didnt know he had? Uh....that tends to happen when you've been ADOPTED...you kinda...I dunno...wonder about the place where you actually came from...
You're adopted?
My apologies if I haven't made myself clear. I have no doubt that Clark would wonder about his history. I'm not adopted and I wonder about mine.
and then, you continue to have a skewed view on pre crisis despite the fact that you've lived during the silver age...
And skewed is your opinion. There were things I like about the silver age and things I didn't.
I prefer the silver age Flash and Green Lantern. ...
As silly as he was, I really liked Utra The Mulit-Alien.
I really really prefer the Silver Age Doom Patrol. It hasn't been good since.
I liked the Silver Age Fortress of Solitude better than what's being done now.
I don't like baby Kal-el being strapped into a rocket with a few blankets and launched into space. This isn't Moses being floated a few feet down a stream. This is a hazardous journey crossing many light years in what amounts to a metal cannister. The baby wouldn't survive it. It would arrive dead.
I don't like the costume gaining super powers under a yellow sun. It's too silly. A dead fiber can't benefit from solar radiation. Having Martha create the costume from terrestrial materials actually first happened in the George Reeve's series. Byrne just brought it back. It makes sense.
I don't like all those different types of Kryptonite.
I can live with the red as long as it doesn't instantly mutate him. I like on Smallville how it alters his personality.
The Jewel Forest is an interesting idea but it's really in need of serious tweaking to make it believable.
There - some likes, don't likes, and some compromises about Pre Crisis.
.silver age clark didnt seem to cry so much to me...
Please tell me where in post crisis (other than that awful film by singer) where Clark has become a leaky faucet? At least not during or immediately after Byrne.
he was just a man that honored where he came from and also honored where he was going...how that is less adult than saying "Screw where my roots came from",
Where did I say this?
baffles me...but then again...obviously, you're sadly biased. I dont have a pre crisis bias...Post Crisis offers great story complexity but most of the ideas were lacking...Pre crisis had concepts and ideas that were great, but shallow storytelling
I agree about the complexity with the post crisis stories. I have to disagree, however, about the depth of storytelling. Please find a copy of 'Crisis at Hand' and read that. Then follow it up with the Superman in Exile arc.
There were some interesting stories in pre crisis days.. one of note was a story that revealed Earth had not been baby Kal-El's first stop. He actually landed on another planet and grew to manhood and then had his aging reversed back to infancy again to be sent out into space a second time. That wasn't the plot. The plot was about Kal-El's aura causing the people of that world to achieve incredible technological advances at an accelerated rate. This was a forgotten tale as it was so highly implausable .. but interesting just the same. It didn't, however, have a lot of emotional depth to it. Kal-El actually married and had a family.
Problem is, again, the high implausability of some of those stories. I really didn't mind the books just prior to the Crisis but they were just saddled with a lot of stuff that didn't work. All Byrne and Wolfman really did was shave a lot of that stuff off so it could be reintroduced in a more believable way.
Byrne's Krypton was both a utopia and a dystopia. It had epic scale. The pre-crisis Krypton was pretty much a happy story from start to finish. Problem there was why wouldn't the council listen to Jor-El and take him seriously? The Krypton of Pre Crisis showed that the Kryptonians were intelligent. They should have easily accepted his findings and set about saving it's people. It just didn't make sense.
In Byrne's take, the society had become quite pompous and refused to believe anything the emotional young Jor-El brought before them. He'd already been labeled a rebel and was disregarded even before he presented them with that research. It made complete sense that they would ignore him and that he would take covert measures to ensure the safety of his child.
But how would a society like that handle children? They would think of natural birth as messy and that technology could handle it better. Therefore, the birthing matrices. Which, coincidentally, was not Byrne's design but DC's. He wanted to have a pregnant Lara make the journey and give birth on our planet. DC said no. John had to find another solution because you can't just strap a baby into a space ship and expect it to survive that long voyage. Had he been in the womb, Lara would have been able to provide the care needed to keep it alive. Instead, John designed a world where babies are kept in birthing matrices. It made sense. Not only to the survival of the child on it's space voyage but as to how that society would handle it ... and, finally, what that society would be like. Completely organic and not a costumed version of our own culture. It was different. It was like classic science fiction.
And the main point of how biased and mind-bendingly ridculous your statement was is that what you said about "The tragedy of krypton"...can be pretty much said...about...every version of krypton...you pretentiously claim to be about depth, but you clearly cant see further than what's right in front of you if all you got from silver age krypton was "Durrrr, 1950's Sci fi"...when psycologists have written books based on research of silver age comics....
Maybe you should take the time to explain to me just as I have in the previous paragraph just what I missed about Silver age Krypton. I'd very much look forward to reading that.