Majick Ninja
Wizard of the Hood
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2007
- Messages
- 109
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Go away.
i concur.
Go away.
Thats fine, thats great.
You like Scarecrow and your getting him again.
Sooooooo whats the problem, lol ??
Anyway does anyone notice Maggie Gylenhall looks old for her age (b. 1977) than Katie (b. 1978)?
This makes little sense to me.Is it because of Nolan's loyalty to the actors and scriptwriters? I want to see new villains like the Penguin or Riddler, and less so with Scarecrow. There are going to be 3 movies from Nolan, so a variety of villains is needed.
As for Rachel Dawes, I believe it's even more unnecessary. Batman doesn't require a romantic arc that will cut off some time for action scenes.
Batman:
More action scenes
More detective scenes
Less romance
Less people gawking over Bat-Toys
Less recycled villain
I couldnt agree with you moreThis makes little sense to me.
I think more Rachel is fine for this plot. She was one of the DA's in BB, shes part of the city, part of the story. Why would she disappear from the story. I think it would be lame if she wasn't in the story just because they couldn't get katie or some other reason. Like when Bruce mentions Vicki Vale in Batman Returns. Why would she just leave the story? And Catwoman at the end of Batman Returns. Where did she go?
harvey Dent and Rachel Dawes is the perfect follow up after her fellow DA was killed by the League of shadows in BB.
And Scarecrow, you want him to go to Mexico and sip on fear toxin Margaritas. His chemicals basically turned the working class of Gotham into maniacs. batmans villains are all maniacs and what happened at the end of BB is a great way to have these characters finally show up. ("Escalation").
Scarecrow is part of the story. This isn't Lethal Weapon or Indiana Jones. This story takes place for the most part in one city.
And more new villains!? We have the Joker!! And a precurser to 2Face as well as more mafia gangsters.
And there was VERY little romance in BB. It only hinted at it!
This makes little sense to me.
I think more Rachel is fine for this plot. She was one of the DA's in BB, shes part of the city, part of the story. Why would she disappear from the story. I think it would be lame if she wasn't in the story just because they couldn't get katie or some other reason. Like when Bruce mentions Vicki Vale in Batman Returns. Why would she just leave the story? And Catwoman at the end of Batman Returns. Where did she go?
harvey Dent and Rachel Dawes is the perfect follow up after her fellow DA was killed by the League of shadows in BB.
And Scarecrow, you want him to go to Mexico and sip on fear toxin Margaritas. His chemicals basically turned the working class of Gotham into maniacs. batmans villains are all maniacs and what happened at the end of BB is a great way to have these characters finally bloom. ("Escalation").
Scarecrow is part of the story. This isn't Lethal Weapon or Indiana Jones. This story takes place for the most part in one city.
And more new villains!? We have the Joker!! And a precurser to 2Face as well as more mafia gangsters.
And there was VERY little romance in BB. It only hinted at it!
And there was VERY little romance in BB. It only hinted at it!
And then at the end they both mutually c***blocked the relationship. So there really could not be less romance.
3. And this is for everyone who hates Rachel: Shes a major part of the new franchise, whether you like it or not.
PWNED!Go away.
Abaddon said:6 pages?
Whoa this thread is still going? Im impressed.
Yes,because how hot you find her is essential to the story.![]()
Yes,because how hot you find her is essential to the story.![]()
Actually come to think of it, I think there are too many villains already in the film. Is there enough screentime for Joker, Sal Maroni, or pre-Two Face if Scarecrow is in the movie?