I agree. This should be a July or August release. October just seems so far away.I do think it has a bad Release Date though.
Exactly, I'm going to bet that this is going to be one of the best films of 2009. This film, to me, is like the english/children's version of 'Pan's Labyrinth'.I'm pretty sure Oscar consideration may be a reason it is going to be released in October.
BTW- I've been looking for the Script, can anyone PM me where I can find it to download?
People are saying that they're terrified that this film is going to be released in October. I'm just hoping that it sticks around until the Oscars come up so that it can gain some more interest. But, I do think that children will be heavily interested in seeing this, when they see the trailer attached with 'Monsters vs. Aliens'.
We can only wait, and hope.I have no doubt kids are going to love this movie. I think its going to have great returns at the box office.
Myself included, really shows that they've done an absolute amazing job on the Wild Things.God that trailer makes me teary eyed
Old post to quote but that would be interesting, to say the least.If they continue with bringing Maurice Sendak's books to the screen, Little Bear should be next. That would just be one straight acid trip.
Didn't the second Pirates movie have hangings in the beginning? A ballsy PG-13 movie doesn't necessarily equal swearing or blood. The type of violence and dark themes we saw in the movies DK88 mentioned are enough to consider those movies ballsy. Mainly because it's not something you would normally see in a movie with that rating. But rating talk is all moot point.I wouldn't call any of those ballsy PG-13 movies. The Dark Knight had almost no blood or swearing. The Pirates of the Caribbean movies were soft PG-13 at best, save for a couple of things involving Davy Jones in the second and third ones. The Lord of the Rings had violence, sure, but most of the blood and stuff came from the orcs. The only heavy thing I remember was the catapaulted severed heads in the third movie. Not saying any of those movies weren't good, but they were nowhere near a level that would warrant an R rating. Titanic was a more ballsy PG-13 movie. That had boobies and an f-bomb.Eh, I don't know about that. The Dark Knight, Pirates of the Caribbean, Lord of the Rings are all pretty ballsy PG-13.. just as much as anything from the 80's.
God that trailer makes me teary eyed
Wow...this looks epic. Though I'm a little worried about the reshoots. I really hope WB doesn't **** this up. They let Zack Snyder make a 3 hour Watchmen adaption with a $100+ million budget, but they get all worked up over this?
But, don't most movies go through reshoots?
It's not usually anything negative.
WB didn't front this it was originally done by Universal who dropped it after seeing A cut of the film and weren't impressed. WB picked it up and commanded re-shoots for a number of reasons includeing:
-Fearing it was "too scary" for children
-Not liking Max Records performance
-Script issues
Go back a few pages because we discussed all the behind the scenes stuff.
those parents who are forcing their kids into acting are insaneThe interview with Spike with Drew McWeeney I posted a page or so ago cleared up alot of rumors about this project. Like that all the criticisms about the kids performance came from one psycho parent who's kid did not get the part, so they we're bashing the film on various boards saying that they seen a screening and the kid was horrible. And from what I gathered, the scary thing was overblown, and the script issues came down to fleshing out the beasts a bit more.