Which are you? Evolutionist? Creationist? Both? None?

[ico]

Evolution. I've seen no evidence supporting creation. Asking questions is not evidence and "the bible says so" is not evidence.

 

[J. J. Jameson]

AiG Support for Creation. Just thought I throw that out there.

 

[Addendum]

Neither. I've never had an interest in the origins of life.

 

[cryptic name]

it doesn't really matter to me. we're here. how we got here isn't important

 

[xwolverine2]

both..i think

 

[spideylover89]

Evolution and Creationism don't cancel eachother out so I don't see why it's so hard to believe in both.

It's possible to believe a higher being created organisms that have evolved over time, after all you can't deny that every living creature on this planet is evolving everyday to adapt to its surroundings.

The only scientific theory that discredits the Bible is the Big Bang theory, which doesn't have that much to do with evolution.

Me personally, I believe in evolution. I don't discredit any religion's explanation for life forming though because I don't have the right answer either, and that doesn't bother me.

 

[Childlike Wild]

I look to science for answers. When it doesn't have answers that satisfy, I just admit I don't know.

...So evolution for me, until proof of something else comes along.

 

[Corinthian™]

AiG Support for Creation. Just thought I throw that out there.

That site made my inner scientist hurl

 

[Batty for Bats!]

I love this diet Dr. Pepper I'm drinking from the can. An nearly ice cold can. I believe in evolution.

and yeah that AiG, wtf?

 

[Lighthouse]

I would have to vote neither, because I don't really BELIEVE in evolution. I don't think you can really "believe" in anything in science. I think from what evidence tells us, evolution is the most plausible theory.....by a long shot.

 

[Symbiote Hulk]

I would have to vote neither, because I don't really BELIEVE in evolution. I don't think you can really "believe" in anything in science. I think from what evidence tells us, evolution is the most plausible theory.....by a long shot.

Why not? You can believe that Iron is a metal right?

 

[War Lord]

Neither. I've never had an interest in the origins of life.

Were you adopted?

 

[Spade]

Were you adopted?

Zing FTW!

I am a creationalist. No form of science has yet proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that creationalism is completely wrong and that there is no higher power outside of what I see to be the realm of theory (which is humorously denounced in every subject outside of evoultion by the scientific community).

 

[Colossal Spoons]

God made the primates we evolved from. Simple.

 

[CrAzYMoFo]

I'm a Deist and I believe that we were created by God and evolved. I believe that life had a creator because the idea that something so complex like the world could be created by a random astronomical occurence doesn't seem plausible to me.

 

[Corinthian™]

Zing FTW!

I am a creationalist. No form of science has yet proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that creationalism is completely wrong and that there is no higher power outside of what I see to be the realm of theory (which is humorously denounced in every subject outside of evoultion by the scientific community).

yet there is NO aceptable evidence that disproves Evolutionism, yet there is a lot of evidence that proves that "creationsim" may not plausible... and there's also a lot of evidence that we are desendant of the monkies

I don't know how people can think otherwise. It's illogical to not believe in a WIDELY accepted theory

and for all of you people that think that Evolutionism are trying to bring you down. Science is not a religion. Science is based on facts. Scientist have religions, from Christianity to Pagans

 

[Corinthian™]

I'm a Deist and I believe that we were created by God and evolved. I believe that life had a creator because the idea that something so complex like the world could be created by a random astronomical occurence doesn't seem plausible to me.

A monkey writing Hamlet does not seem plausible, yet it may happen

 

[CrAzYMoFo]

A monkey writing Hamlet does not seem plausible, yet it may happen

Technically it did happen if you believe in evolution...

 

[Corinthian™]

Technically it did happen if you believe in evolution...

you are missing the point

 

[Kent]

I'm a Deist and I believe that we were created by God and evolved. I believe that life had a creator because the idea that something so complex like the world could be created by a random astronomical occurence doesn't seem plausible to me.

If you're talking about earth, then there was very little "random" about it. Physical processes are not random, they are the opposite of random.

 

[War Lord]

yet there is NO aceptable evidence that disproves Evolutionism, yet there is a lot of evidence that proves that "creationsim" may not plausible... and there's also a lot of evidence that we are desendant of the monkies

I don't know how people can think otherwise. It's illogical to not believe in a WIDELY accepted theory

and for all of you people that think that Evolutionism are trying to bring you down. Science is not a religion. Science is based on facts. Scientist have religions, from Christianity to Pagans

That depends on how you define Creationism. There's more ways to define it than the strict evangelistic interpretation of Genesis.

 

[Corinthian™]

That depends on how you define Creationism. There's more ways to define it than the strict evangelistic interpretation of Genesis.

oh, of course. Creationsim could also be defined as the big Bang, but you know what was I talking aboot, Jonty

 

[CrAzYMoFo]

If you're talking about earth, then there was very little "random" about it. Physical processes are not random, they are the opposite of random.

I was talking about the Big Bang Theory.

 

[Spade]

I don't know how people can think otherwise. It's illogical to not believe in a WIDELY accepted theory

You just said the exact reasoning as to why I choose not to believe such. A theory can be disproven, no matter how popular the belief, so long as it is a theory within the realm of logic. At one time the scientific community scoffed the same way it does at creationalism at the notion that the Earth was not flat.

and for all of you people that think that Evolutionism are trying to bring you down. Science is not a religion. Science is based on facts. Scientist have religions, from Christianity to Pagans

Scientists also further their own beliefs at times by falsifying the 'facts' at the expense of the truth. It happens on a daily basis. When you refuse to see anything beyond your own view, that happens. I've done a lot of research into evolution and cannot see a viable reason to take any of it as an indisputable reason for why organisms are here today just in the same way you see no reason as to why creationalism is valid.

oh, of course. Creationsim could also be defined as the big Bang, but you know what was I talking aboot, Jonty

Was that really needed?

 

[CrAzYMoFo]

you are missing the point

Did I miss the point or did you not present it very well????



Nah, I understood what you meant I'm just busting your chops.