The Endless
WE are Groot
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2013
- Messages
- 8,009
- Reaction score
- 661
- Points
- 103
Hehehe Hal Butthead.
You mean like the movie?anyone that's ever read a comic/anyone that's aware of Green Lantern through anything other than Justice League: TAS knows how much better Hal is![]()
Generally speaking, anyone aware of Green Lantern through anything outside of Justice League TAS would prefer Hal JordanYou mean like the movie?
We're getting a reboot GL with no connections to that last movie. The events of that movie didn't happen, and won't be addressed. Those movies contradict each other already. It's confirmed they don't exist in the same universe.No, you're missing my point. I DO want to acknowledge the GL movie. I don't want the GL movie retconned. It happened; all that happened; we just don't want it in our movie. So you can bring in the next Green Lantern without undoing anything or pretending it never happened.
Just a shorter legacy. Rayner was in a lot of ways just a Jordan rehash, and Baz is so new not even all comic readers know who he is. Putting someone that fresh in a major role is asinine. It would be like someone casting Bane as the main villain.
Hal Jordan, played by Garrett Hedlund.
Gotcha. Makes sense. I only ask because going with either seems like an opportunity to add diversity to the team without having to racebend. Now, I'm fine with whatever way they go, but it would be refreshing to have a diverse cast outside of the token black guy.
But I'd rather they just do what's best for the story.
John Stewart is not a token black guy. He is a strong character that has earned his place in the lexicon irrespective of skin color.
These were characters created in the 40's and 50's, when it was considered making your characters anything other than a white male a bad business decision. A time when discrimination against minorities was allowed. These characters aren't white based solely on creative reasons from the artist, especially during those times.I hate the idea of changing tradition just to add diversity. Forcing diversity on people to satisfy parts of the audience that are calling for diversity doesn't help anything in my opinion. Personally I can't stand it. The characters are who they are, leave it that way. Besides, people of all nationalities, genders and races enjoy the characters exactly the way they are already, if they didn't then they would never make the movie to begin with.
I also believe calling Wonder Woman a token female character is selling the character short. She is not a token female superhero, she is the definitive female superhero. I feel the same way to a lesser extent about Martian Manhunter and Cyborg, they are just part of the team (one being an original founding member and one being a next-gen founding member). Both will probably see time in the Justice League before this run is over.
I don't see why people can't just enjoy the characters/members the way they always have been, instead of trying to force diversity into the matter just for the sake of adding diversity.
Does the diversity of the League so far satisfy you? If Hal Jordan and Barry Allen are the last two members, will you be disappointed?These were characters created in the 40's and 50's, when it was considered making your characters anything other than a white male a bad business decision. A time when discrimination against minorities was allowed. These characters aren't white based solely on creative reasons from the artist, especially during those times.
So don't tell me diversity doesn't matter, it will always matter.
I wasn't referring to John Stewart when I made that comment. It was a general statement about how diversifying a cast typically just involves throwing in a black character with little to do other than be the black character.
If they were to throw in Simon Baz I would consider that more token than Stewart, seeing as Stewart is a character who has a lot to go on.