Indy Flash
Archeological Speedster
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,968
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
I like both Burton 89 and Nolan TDK.
I think this thread raises an interesting question: What's more important to us, making a good Batman movie, or making a good movie, period?
Oh trust me, I will. It may be one of the very few things I'm looking forward to with the DVD releasing.I hope you do an update to include the The Dark Knight Rises.
Cant wait for the final stats from Rises.
It seems that way, but who knows. I was actually surprised that B89 had the most. I really thought it was going to be BB or TDK.should be alot less I reckon, it's a long film and he didn't appear much honestly.
It seems that way, but who knows. I was actually surprised that B89 had the most. I really thought it was going to be BB or TDK.
Ha, that was the exact reason why I did it. t:I was shocked that BR had more than the first 2 Nolan movies. It's ironic considering how often the naysayers ***** about BR not having "enough Batman".
should be alot less I reckon, it's a long film and he didn't appear much honestly.
It seems that way, but who knows. I was actually surprised that B89 had the most. I really thought it was going to be BB or TDK.
Ha, that was the exact reason why I did it. t:
The Dark Knight Rises: Total running time of 164 minutes.
-(return to Gotham/Bat-pod) 2:19
-(helps Catwoman escape/The Bat/Batcave) 3:33
-(Searching the sewers/Bane vs Batman fight) 4:59
-(on ice with Gordon/saves Blake from LOS) 1:30
-(gives Catwoman the Bat-pod) 0:56
-(City Hall/Bane fight #2/flying away in The Bat) 7:56
Total: 21:13/164= 13% of Bat screen time.
Batman doesn't show up until 46 minutes into the movie.
No, the knock on the Burton movies is they hardly focus at all on the protagonist, making him non relatable.
Who cares about the amount of screen time in costume?
It's less about quantity, and more about quality. Was his screen time IMPACTFUL.