Wow ! This thread is still much closer than I thought it would be.
What do people think about SWTFA's RT score, 93% (whereas SW ANH has 94% ) ?
In comparison GOTG has 91%.
Personally, if I were the only critic on Earth, and I had to rank them out of 100 (which is not how RT works, but is a convenient method for comparison)
I would give SWANH 100%, it's pretty much perfect (like James Cameron's Aliens) it changed moviemaking itself and has had a lasting impact on Western culture.
I would give GOTG between 85 - 90%. It's huge fun and wonderful to watch, but I don't think it's going to have anywhere near the lasting impact SW has had. I still maintain that GOTG is the film that has best captured the SW (and this is SW ANH) vibe since that first film came out - I mean, when they first fly into Nowhere it's a "whooaaa" moment, kind of like in SWANH when they get tractored into the Death Star.
I would give SWTFA about 75%. It's a good movie, fun to watch, but there's nothing really that special about it, nothing that will change film-making.
It's good, but we've seen it all before.
Anyway, I think the 93% is vastly overinflated score.
Interesting that critics are willing to give movies a real pass if they have the SW moniker - I mean, Attack of the Clones got 65% and really deserves around 30%, it's garbage - a boring story, badly acted, poorly paced and salvaged only by a couple of decent action scenes - although even then there is a complete lack of suspense (we never feel that the main characters are ever in serious jeopardy - a lot like Phantom Menace, which I believe is actually a better film, because the kid was a much better actor than Haden Christensen).
Thoughts ?