Which studio do you think handles their properties the weakest: Sony, WB or Fox?

Which is the worst

  • Warner Bros

  • Sony

  • Fox


Results are only viewable after voting.
In comparison to Fox, Sony started Spider-Man well and then got a little greedy and foolish but not, like Fox, obviously really foolish or particularly exploitative.
 
DC Comics is the best and most accurate, Marvel Studios/Disney is the worse
 
WB. Fox at least tries

this is what I mean, you have two sets of Superhero fans, Movies fans, and Comicbook readers. and it's clear by this thread where the majority of votes are going.

Batman vs Superman, and The Watchman are in my opinion some of the best and accurate story boards to date. movie fans didn't understand BvS, but Comic fans did, it was based on Death of Superman, Dark Knight returns and the Injustice franchise. the main characters were based on John Byrne's 1986 Man of Steel last Son of Kryton run, not Superman! and Batman was based on Dark Knight returns. both are totally different to their other counterparts. but many didn't understand that, people went to see the film expecting to see Richard Donner's Superman, and the Batman in previous films.

Marvel's Ironman 2 was based on Demon in a bottle which was terrible, and Ironman 3 Extremis which was even worse.
then Civil War was just a joke, amazing fight scenes, terrible shaky cams, with the worse plot ever in the MCU.
but they fix it with Thor 3, Black Panther and Infinity Wars, Marvel has greatly improved, but I would still put them at the bottom for how they handle their properties as far as source material goes.
 
An easy way to shift more votes to Sony in this thread. ;)

1. Which studio hasn't had a good superhero movie they individually and exclusively produced in the last year?

2. Under the same parameters, which hasn't had one in five years?

3. Under the same parameters, which hasn't had one in 10 years? 12 years?

Sorry, Sony.
 
Batman vs Superman, and The Watchman are in my opinion some of the best and accurate story boards to date. movie fans didn't understand BvS, but Comic fans did, it was based on Death of Superman, Dark Knight returns and the Injustice franchise. the main characters were based on John Byrne's 1986 Man of Steel last Son of Kryton run, not Superman! and Batman was based on Dark Knight returns. both are totally different to their other counterparts. but many didn't understand that, people went to see the film expecting to see Richard Donner's Superman, and the Batman in previous films.
That excuse never gets old.

As a comic book fan, the fact that WB can no longer do a Dark Knight Returns because Snyder took the final battle to do BvS is inexcusable. Thankfully it exists in animated form.
 
An easy way to shift more votes to Sony in this thread. ;)

1. Which studio hasn't had a good superhero movie they individually and exclusively produced in the last year?

2. Under the same parameters, which hasn't had one in five years?

3. Under the same parameters, which hasn't had one in 10 years? 12 years?

Sorry, Sony.

The last time Sony made a good superhero movie X2: X-Men United was just released and Batman Begins hadn't even come out yet.

For another comparison, it has been longer since Sony's last good superhero movie than it was between the release of the original Richard Donner Superman in the 70s and Tim Burton's Batman in 1989.
 
Are we not including Homecoming as a Sony movie?
 
this is what I mean, you have two sets of Superhero fans, Movies fans, and Comicbook readers. and it's clear by this thread where the majority of votes are going.

Batman vs Superman, and The Watchman are in my opinion some of the best and accurate story boards to date. movie fans didn't understand BvS, but Comic fans did, it was based on Death of Superman, Dark Knight returns and the Injustice franchise. the main characters were based on John Byrne's 1986 Man of Steel last Son of Kryton run, not Superman! and Batman was based on Dark Knight returns. both are totally different to their other counterparts. but many didn't understand that, people went to see the film expecting to see Richard Donner's Superman, and the Batman in previous films.

Marvel's Ironman 2 was based on Demon in a bottle which was terrible, and Ironman 3 Extremis which was even worse.
then Civil War was just a joke, amazing fight scenes, terrible shaky cams, with the worse plot ever in the MCU.
but they fix it with Thor 3, Black Panther and Infinity Wars, Marvel has greatly improved, but I would still put them at the bottom for how they handle their properties as far as source material goes.

Your opinions here are much like you ability to capitalise sentences.
 
I'm going with Sony, because outside of SM: HC, they haven't really done well with most of the franchises available to them.
 
I give the edge to Sony. I liked a couple of their films but moves like the Venom film are just confusing. Fox and WB are both hit or miss but at least they try to focus on what's best for the main characters they own.
 
Live action WB definitely needs work. But their animated and TV outputs have varying degrees of success.

Sony, meanwhile, is gonna Sony.
 
The last time Sony made a good superhero movie X2: X-Men United was just released and Batman Begins hadn't even come out yet.

For another comparison, it has been longer since Sony's last good superhero movie than it was between the release of the original Richard Donner Superman in the 70s and Tim Burton's Batman in 1989.

What about Spider-Man 2?
 
As much as I want to say WB, I have to say Sony. They watched WB fail with Snyder, which still did ok with Wonder Woman and look to do ok with Shazam and Aquaman and basically said "hold my beer" with Venom, Potluck and Silver Sable.
 
this is what I mean, you have two sets of Superhero fans, Movies fans, and Comicbook readers. and it's clear by this thread where the majority of votes are going.

Batman vs Superman, and The Watchman are in my opinion some of the best and accurate story boards to date. movie fans didn't understand BvS, but Comic fans did, it was based on Death of Superman, Dark Knight returns and the Injustice franchise. the main characters were based on John Byrne's 1986 Man of Steel last Son of Kryton run, not Superman! and Batman was based on Dark Knight returns. both are totally different to their other counterparts. but many didn't understand that, people went to see the film expecting to see Richard Donner's Superman, and the Batman in previous films.
Well said overall.
Your opinions here are much like you ability to capitalise sentences.
You're seriously going to try and pick on the poster because they don't agree with you?
 
I would say Sony because they have fewer properties and yet still manage to mess those up. Plus with announced Spider-verse movies I'm just left scratching my head
 
WB, by far. Their lows surpass the other studios ones by a large margin. It's hard to top things like Catwoman, Green Lantern, several Superman movies, BvS, Justice league, etc.
 
Sony. They only have two good movies and that is 99.9% of Raimi. And from what I've heard Spider-Man 3s problems stemmed from studio interference; telling Sam which villian(s) to put at the point of shoe horning them in the movie. Supposedly SR just wanted Sandman as the villian but Sony demanded Venom's inclusion. Harry becoming The New Goblin, I can't say if it was Sams or Sony's?

And going by the Venom trailer their streak of bad movies looks to continue. I honestly don't know if I will see it and I've never missed a Marvel movie. Not even the last Fantastic Four and I wasn't even expecting it to be that good and still went.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"