• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Who should be next on the Big Screen?

As many people have said, I think Thor has helped show the potential for a WW movie. I think other than WB/DC not producing many non big name/non Bats&Supes movies, the only reason WW hasnt been made is because she's a woman

Even though I like FLash alot more than I like WW, I'm more excited to see a WW film and I think WW would be more successful in the end


@Mondodragon: I'm not really sure Vixen can hold her own solo film. Im actually really skeptical of that idea
 
when it comes to women heroes being a tough sell: i dont think its so much because they're women, i think audiences are perfectly open to a female centric hero story. but, rather the problem being writers usually dont know how to write good compelling women.

quentin tarantino did a good job of it with Kill Bill.
 
You're comparing leprechauns to unicorns. Assuming 50,000 thor readers all go to see the movie, that's still a small fraction of the number of people that have to see the movie that will be enough to make it a hit. Comic sales =/= ticket sales. They sell on such a tiny scale compared to movies, you might as well be comparing 7/11 novelty cup sales.

What i'm saying is there is just not that much interest in WW anymore. Even from comic fans. Especially from DC themselves, who don't know what to do with the character. DC don't even really give a crap about Superman, of all characters, at the moment. It's all Green Lantern and Flash overload.

She isn't that much of an icon anymore. I wouldn't even say she's part of DCs big 3 anymore. GL has taken her place there.

If they made a great movie about Wonder Woman? Yea it might put bums in seats. What i'm saying though... is there doesn't seem to be any interest at all in putting her onto the big screen. DC/WB don't care about her. The show was basically them throwing the fans a bone and saying "Well we won't make a movie, here's a crappy TV show, now shut up".
 
characters go through waves and lulls of popularity and quality. it happens to every character. DC tried to give WW a push with the current odyssey arc, but it failed to catch on (and rightly so, its a crappy story). she may currently leave something to be desired, but that doesnt negate the success of her past. Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman will always be DC's trinity.
 
when it comes to women heroes being a tough sell: i dont think its so much because they're women, i think audiences are perfectly open to a female centric hero story. but, rather the problem being writers usually dont know how to write good compelling women.

quentin tarantino did a good job of it with Kill Bill.

Im not so sure. I like to think that people are willing to see a female centric action story and that if it's a legit good movie it'll make money. But as you said most of the time the writing is poor and the films aren't good, so they dont make money.

I think the last female centric action movie was Hanna, and that got really good reviews, but it barely made it's budget back (grossed a little over 37 mill on a 30 mill budget), but then again it was released in April and I dont think it was marketed towards everyone. And then Salt got decent reviews, was marketed to everyone, and it doubled it's budget and then some; same with Charlie's Angels
I also think the reluctance might have a bit to do with merchandising. Young boys who buy the toys might not buy a girl action figure.

So Im not really sure. I dont think there has been a really good, accessible female action film so I cant judge if people are willing to see one.
Even though it's not an action film, I really wanna see how Bridesmaids does this weekend. It has all female leads, but from watching the trailer it has diarrea jokes, burping, and alot of what is usually seen as male oriented humor. Bridesmaids has a largely female cast (probably what WW would have) but seems to be marketed more towards guys (like an action film usually is). I'd see it because it looks funny, but I'm saving my money.

What i'm saying is there is just not that much interest in WW anymore. Even from comic fans. Especially from DC themselves, who don't know what to do with the character. DC don't even really give a crap about Superman, of all characters, at the moment. It's all Green Lantern and Flash overload.

She isn't that much of an icon anymore. I wouldn't even say she's part of DCs big 3 anymore. GL has taken her place there.

If they made a great movie about Wonder Woman? Yea it might put bums in seats. What i'm saying though... is there doesn't seem to be any interest at all in putting her onto the big screen. DC/WB don't care about her. The show was basically them throwing the fans a bone and saying "Well we won't make a movie, here's a crappy TV show, now shut up".

Wondy is still an icon. Maybe not in the comic book world (but let's face it comics are all f***ed up now), but if you flash a Wonder WOman picture to anyone they'll know who that is. At Six FLags, I remember seeing girls running around in Wonder Woman costumes more than I saw anyone wearing Flash or GL costumes. Even look how much attention is being drawn to the WW from mainstream, non geek, news outlets. Wondy is still big.

ANd DC/WB doesnt really care about putting her on the big screen? I agree. But that's DC/WB, they're really not the best at putting their heroes on the big screen.

When I heard they were making a Thor movie. I shrugged. I knew I'd see it because a)it's a superhero movie, b) because it tied in the Avengers but other than that I didnt have much interest. I never read a single Thor solo comic. I had no connection to the character. But when I heard an Oscar caliber director was directing, I got interested. But when Hemsworth and Hiddleston were cast, I shrugged. Then I heard Natalie Portman, arguably the best young actress around...maybe even the best actress around period, signed on I was pleasantly surprised. Then when Anthony Hopkins signed on, I knew the movie had to be special to bring in all this talent. Then the trailer came out and I knew I'd see Thor opening day after all that.

The point of my "Thor story" is that it's all about marketing and who you get talent-wise. I was a non fan and just from the talent involved and later a trailer, I was stoked for Thor. True WW might not have the most popular comic stories out there, but she's enough of an icon to put butts in seats.
But then for the people who aren't interested in WW as a character (as with me and Thor). They hear a good director like JJ Abrhams signs on to direct. AFter that a good, popular actor like Jake Gyllenhaal signs on to play the love interest. And then they hear that a great actress like Cate Blanchett or even a popular actress like Angelina Jolie signs on to play Wonder Woman's mother. And then months after that a trailer comes out showing WW fighting Hydras, Steve in a dogfight, and all this modern monuments surrounded by Greek mythology. I think they'll get interested regardless of character. Like me, and many others, with Thor
 
Last edited:
Im not so sure. I like to think that people are willing to see a female centric action story and that if it's a legit good movie it'll make money. But as you said most of the time the writing is poor and the films aren't good, so they dont make money.

I think the last female centric action movie was Hanna, and that got really good reviews, but it barely made it's budget back (grossed a little over 37 mill on a 30 mill budget), but then again it was released in April and I dont think it was marketed towards everyone. And then Salt got decent reviews, was marketed to everyone, and it doubled it's budget and then some; same with Charlie's Angels
I also think the reluctance might have a bit to do with merchandising. Young boys who buy the toys might not buy a girl action figure.

So Im not really sure. I dont think there has been a really good, accessible female action film so I cant judge if people are willing to see one.
Even though it's not an action film, I really wanna see how Bridesmaids does this weekend. It has all female leads, but from watching the trailer it has diarrea jokes, burping, and alot of what is usually seen as male oriented humor. Bridesmaids has a largely female cast (probably what WW would have) but seems to be marketed more towards guys (like an action film usually is). I'd see it because it looks funny, but I'm saving my money.

Hanna? I've never even heard of that one. Did it have any sort of marketing campaign? ha.

And I'm sure it's a mixture of things that make female centric movies a bit harder to sell. But i still think people not knowing how to write a female lead as being the biggest problem. People may be a bit more hesitant with female leads, but i think generally they are open to them if the film looks good enough. i suppose Sucker Punch was a female centric action movie that did poorly. I'd wager it didnt do well because it looked like a crappy video game.

But i think between wonder woman's iconography, a good looking film, and solid marketing....a Wonder Woman movie would do well.
 
i'd like to see: Firestorm (Rusch & Raymond)..
Flash (Allen)
Aquaman
Plastic Man
Green Arrow
Justice League
 
The genre needs a good female superhero film. If Wonder Woman was done right it could break that mold.

Next on the list for me would be the Flash
 
The Flash is the frontrunner. Superspeed has yet to be captured in an exciting manner onscreen, and Flash is THE superspeed character. Plus, he has a good rogues gallery and an interesting supporting cast.

Personally, I'd like to see Supermax get made with Green Arrow as the star. It'll introduced GA to the general audience, have DCU characters in it, and avoid the cliche "origin story" we've been subjected to.

Captain Marvel could also work. Personally, I'd set it in the 40's, with The Rock as Black Adam.

DC definetely needs to put out a Team movie. Teen Titans would be ideal for that, only if its not kiddie though, or at least not entirely childish. It needs the tone that the wolfram/perez issues had.

Doubt Wonder woman is being looked at for consideration, hence why she's being shipped off to TV. Her animated film is exactly how i'd introduce her to the big screen. That movie used all aspects of Wonder Woman's history and brought in mythology without boring the audience
 
I have to disagree. Superspeed has been captured in exciting fashion many times over onscreen. Maybe not running speed and definetly not as fast as the Flash goes, but Superman, Thor, Iron Man, The Incredibles, and Ang Lee's Hulk (the best part of that) had exciting superspeed sequences. I'd like Flash, but I think others should be next

Eh Supermax was a dumb idea to introduce GA to people and really just a bad sounding idea. Yeah it's different, but different doesn't always mean good. That being said a straightforward GA film should be up in there. I mean you dont need a $100 million budget for it. Im surprised they havent made it
 
Last edited:
But i think between wonder woman's iconography, a good looking film, and solid marketing....a Wonder Woman movie would do well.

Exactly. It is the combination of all the right factors that will make any movie a success regardless of its subject.

In a day where most big movies coming out are remakes, reboots, or an established part of pop culture, who would have thought a movie like Inception would make over 800 million dollars worldwide, a movie without some sort of pop culture history in the mind of the mainstream audience.

This is why I'd like to see a Wonder Woman movie. The biggest problem is finding the right combination of things in order to make it that successful.

One wrong step could throw everything out the window.

Casting, writing, directing, marketing, etc... All extremely important.

Studios these days need to realize that care needs to be taken when making these decisions. You need to capture the imagination of the mainstream and that involves careful though and not just looking at the dollar signs behind a big budget movie with lots of CG effects.
 
The genre needs a good female superhero film. If Wonder Woman was done right it could break that mold.

Next on the list for me would be the Flash

If there's any female SH who deserves to break that mold, it's Wonder Woman. :ww:
 
The genre needs a good female superhero film. If Wonder Woman was done right it could break that mold.

Next on the list for me would be the Flash

I can agree about Wonder Woman. She could break the glass ceiling for superheroine films.

The Flash is the frontrunner. Superspeed has yet to be captured in an exciting manner onscreen, and Flash is THE superspeed character. Plus, he has a good rogues gallery and an interesting supporting cast.

Personally, I'd like to see Supermax get made with Green Arrow as the star. It'll introduced GA to the general audience, have DCU characters in it, and avoid the cliche "origin story" we've been subjected to.

Captain Marvel could also work. Personally, I'd set it in the 40's, with The Rock as Black Adam.

DC definetely needs to put out a Team movie. Teen Titans would be ideal for that, only if its not kiddie though, or at least not entirely childish. It needs the tone that the wolfram/perez issues had.

Doubt Wonder woman is being looked at for consideration, hence why she's being shipped off to TV. Her animated film is exactly how i'd introduce her to the big screen. That movie used all aspects of Wonder Woman's history and brought in mythology without boring the audience

I disagree about Supermax being the best way to introduce Green Arrow to the general audience. He gets sent to prison with his bow, and the potential to use his signature archery talent, taken from him. I'm not saying do an origin story, but a regular Green Arrow movie would be best for his introduction. Then maybe rewrite Supermax into a sequel after Green Arrow is already established.

I have to disagree. Superspeed has been captured in exciting fashion many times over onscreen. Maybe not running speed and definetly not as fast as the Flash goes, but Superman, Thor, Iron Man, The Incredibles, and Ang Lee's Hulk (the best part of that) had exciting superspeed sequences. I'd like Flash, but I think others should be next

Eh Supermax was a dumb idea to introduce GA to people and really just a bad sounding idea. Yeah it's different, but different doesn't always mean good. That being said a straightforward GA film should be up in there. I mean you dont need a $100 million budget for it. Im surprised they havent made it

Agreed.
 
The Flash, followed by Aquaman and then Wonder Woman.
 
I have to disagree. Superspeed has been captured in exciting fashion many times over onscreen. Maybe not running speed and definetly not as fast as the Flash goes, but Superman, Thor, Iron Man, The Incredibles, and Ang Lee's Hulk (the best part of that) had exciting superspeed sequences. I'd like Flash, but I think others should be next

Eh Supermax was a dumb idea to introduce GA to people and really just a bad sounding idea. Yeah it's different, but different doesn't always mean good. That being said a straightforward GA film should be up in there. I mean you dont need a $100 million budget for it. Im surprised they havent made it

They'd have to tone his speed down quite a lot, like they did in the cartoons.

Flash moves at FTL. That's a whole lot faster than any other hero portrayed on screen.
 
I wonder if Hawkeye (Avengers) has destroyed the possibility to see Green Arrow in a movie. The non-comic reader and the regular cinema-goer will think it's just a cheap rip-off made only to ride on the "cool-hero-with-a-bow" success.

But I think after GL, the next heroes to enter the silver screen will be Flash, Hawkman and then either WW or Aquaman.
WB will make a film out of the Carter Hall/Katar Hol character just because the "Lantern" films open up posibilities of superheroes in space.
 
They'd have to tone his speed down quite a lot, like they did in the cartoons.

Flash moves at FTL. That's a whole lot faster than any other hero portrayed on screen.

AS I said, they havent portrayed it exactly like The Flash in terms of speed. But still superspeed has been captured


I wonder if Hawkeye (Avengers) has destroyed the possibility to see Green Arrow in a movie. The non-comic reader and the regular cinema-goer will think it's just a cheap rip-off made only to ride on the "cool-hero-with-a-bow" success.

But I think after GL, the next heroes to enter the silver screen will be Flash, Hawkman and then either WW or Aquaman.
WB will make a film out of the Carter Hall/Katar Hol character just because the "Lantern" films open up posibilities of superheroes in space.
I was thinking the same thing. But I think people know GA than Hawkeye so people might actually think Hawkeye is a GA rip off. But I dont think one would hurt the other than much
 
AS I said, they havent portrayed it exactly like The Flash in terms of speed. But still superspeed has been captured

Agreed. But at some point during the film they have to show how fast the Flash can be, as was done in the first Christopher Reeve Superman movie (reversing the rotation of earth).



I was thinking the same thing. But I think people know GA than Hawkeye so people might actually think Hawkeye is a GA rip off. But I dont think one would hurt the other than much

Absolutely
 
They'd have to tone his speed down quite a lot, like they did in the cartoons.

Flash moves at FTL. That's a whole lot faster than any other hero portrayed on screen.

I think this is a good speed for Flash:

tumblr_le0knmfbkb1qc2jhfo1_500.gif


Not as fast as the comic Flash and not as slow as the TV version.
 
It's a movie so Flash's speed is not going to be consistent anyway. How fast he can move will probably depend on how high the stakes are, as is often the case with comic movies (the superhero's power seems to increase if the situation is desperate enough).
 
I have to disagree. Superspeed has been captured in exciting fashion many times over onscreen. Maybe not running speed and definetly not as fast as the Flash goes, but Superman, Thor, Iron Man, The Incredibles, and Ang Lee's Hulk (the best part of that) had exciting superspeed sequences. I'd like Flash, but I think others should be next

Disagree. Besides The Incredibles,I barely paid attention to the fact that they were moving at superspeed, and more on the idea that they were flying. Like I said, Flash is THE superspeed character, and would be able to capture Superspeed in a way that would blow those movies away. And the only character who deserves a flick before Flash is Wonder Woman, and thats not gonna happen anytime soon.

Eh Supermax was a dumb idea to introduce GA to people and really just a bad sounding idea. Yeah it's different, but different doesn't always mean good. That being said a straightforward GA film should be up in there. I mean you dont need a $100 million budget for it. Im surprised they havent made it

Disagree with this also. Supermax was a good idea thats been done in comics before, thats why I felt it should be a movie, not merely because its different.
 
Is this really about what's going to happen anytime soon or what deserves it. Of what's going to happen sooner, yeah thats Flash of what deserves it as I said that's Wonder Woman.

Just because Supermax worked in the comics does not mean it would work on film. It takes away his archery, takes away his secret identity and how the character looks in general, a lot of the other DC supervillains cameos probably wont happen, Black Canary wasn't in it,.
I dont see whats so special about it and I dont think audiences will either
 
Last edited:
^ most of the things you listed could be changed in a rewrite, and at most we wont see any batman or superman villains in there, not that that matters cause id rather see DCU villains anyway. Not to mention a script review clearly sets up GA's archery abilities before he goes to prison.

And no one said this thread was about what's going to come sooner. Flash deserves to be next, especially since WW is getting her own TV show.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"