Who should play Spider-Man after Tobey?

Tobeys decent,but I hate some of his facial expressions.
 
I would have liked James Marsden as a potential candidate too. The way he gets traeted as Cyclops in the xmovies is so shameful it saddens me that a potential awesome pee/spidey was wasted in one of the harshest ways possible.

Give me Jake G now!
 
Marsden is not nerdy looking in the least bit.
 
If Spider-Man was made back in the day,Michael J. Fox would've been one of the greatest Peter Parkers in his prime.
 
Sabretooth said:
If Spider-Man was made back in the day,Michael J. Fox would've been one of the greatest Peter Parkers in his prime.

Too short. Other than that yeah.
 
RedIsNotBlue said:
Too short. Other than that yeah.
Spider-Man was never tall. And it's not too hard to add a couple inches with the camera.
 
Lunar_Wolf said:
If Spider-man 4 gets made and Tobey it not in it as he only signed a contract for 3 movies, who do you think would be a great Spider-man to replace Tobey? :spidey:

Just because he only signed for 3 doesn't mean he won't do the fourth if there is one.
 
Sabretooth said:
Spider-Man was never tall. And it's not too hard to add a couple inches with the camera.

I don't care what you say. Fox is WAY too short. 5' 4 1/2"....no sorry. He would look like a child dressed up for Halloween. Spider-Man is 5' 10" according to Marvel just FYI.
 
I like the adam brody choice. Hi witty banter is great which we could use more of in the movies!!!
 
That was my main problem withe spider-man movies they didn't have his trademark banter with villains.
 
Michael J Fox would have ruled.

But now Seth Green should be Spidey... I don't think the height thing is an issue cause it doesnt define Spider-man.... I think that he's an everyman so he needs to look Joe Normal and unimpressive as Parker
 
Hi

No one, if Tobey doesn't want to do anymore then no more films should be made.
 
James Marsden is going to be in Superman Returns and has been in 3 X-Men movies. There's no chance of him getting Spider-Man too.
 
Boy Zeppo said:
Michael J Fox would have ruled.

But now Seth Green should be Spidey... I don't think the height thing is an issue cause it doesnt define Spider-man.... I think that he's an everyman so he needs to look Joe Normal and unimpressive as Parker


Theyd look rdiculous next to their cast members,
 
IF Tobey was not going to be doing Spiderman any more I could live with Jake Gyllenhaal.


Jake%20Gyllenhaal.gif




He is a good actor who is able to get in the kind of shape necessary to play Spiderman. It does not hurt that he kina looks like Tobey.
 
Sabretooth said:
Spider-Man was never tall. And it's not too hard to add a couple inches with the camera.

Spider-man is 5'10". That's above average height. Some people are still mistaken Spider-man with the Ultimate version. Ultimate Spider-man height is around 5'8" but he's 15.

If you're short and you need a superhero to represent, get Wolverine
 
chiefchirpa said:
Spider-man is 5'10". That's above average height. Some people are still mistaken Spider-man with the Ultimate version. Ultimate Spider-man height is around 5'8" but he's 15.

If you're short and you need a superhero to represent, get Wolverine

I don't think it's integeral to the character. Not in the way it is to Superman or some of the others.

Is 5'10" above average? I didnt know that, i'm 5'11" and now I feel like a giant hahahaha.

I think Johnny Lewis could be a good Parker
 
some of these suggestions make me thank god they choose Tobey Maguire, Jake would have been okay if they started with him but when the time comes to replace Tobey because of age Jake will be to old to takeover a franchise.
 
Spider-Man has always been played off as short. In the comics he is always drawfed by other heroes like Captain America, Iron Man, the X-Men, DareDevil, etc. It's kind of integral to his character which is that of the meek one, the one who is insecure amongst all these greater heroes. Spider-Man is suppose to be short, because outside of his costume (and frequently in it) he is the one who is stepped on, unnoticed and trampled. Between the Daily Bugle decrying his pressence, the girl troubles, the job woes, the worrisome Aunt May...he is the quinessential little guy. I have no idea why people hate the 1st and second films. Aside from getting almost every character right (aside from MJ's look) it captured to essence of the comic. The over the top villians, the corny dialogue, the geekish and insecure Peter Parker...it also like Spider-Man focused on Peter Parker...which Spider-Man has always done. Amazing Spider-Man (especially under Stan Lee) read like a soap opera/sitcom where villians made guest appearances. The life problem Peter was facing would be interrupted by a villian. Anyone who doesn't like the SM movies either has a misconception of what Spider-Man is or never read the comics.
 
ShadowBoxing said:
Anyone who doesn't like the SM movies either has a misconception of what Spider-Man is or never read the comics.

That's a great quote.

lol
 
blind_fury said:
Enough with Maguire already! He's not even a good Spider-man. His voice sounds nothing like Spider-man should sound like. His demeaner and personality is NOTHING like Peter Parker or Spider-man from comics and television. He sleeps walks through the role just like his partner in crime Kirsten "looks/acts nothing like MJ" Dunst.

You don´t know Spidey Comics? isn´t.
 
ShadowBoxing said:
Spider-Man has always been played off as short. In the comics he is always drawfed by other heroes like Captain America, Iron Man, the X-Men, DareDevil, etc. It's kind of integral to his character which is that of the meek one, the one who is insecure amongst all these greater heroes. Spider-Man is suppose to be short, because outside of his costume (and frequently in it) he is the one who is stepped on, unnoticed and trampled. Between the Daily Bugle decrying his pressence, the girl troubles, the job woes, the worrisome Aunt May...he is the quinessential little guy. I have no idea why people hate the 1st and second films. Aside from getting almost every character right (aside from MJ's look) it captured to essence of the comic. The over the top villians, the corny dialogue, the geekish and insecure Peter Parker...it also like Spider-Man focused on Peter Parker...which Spider-Man has always done. Amazing Spider-Man (especially under Stan Lee) read like a soap opera/sitcom where villians made guest appearances. The life problem Peter was facing would be interrupted by a villian. Anyone who doesn't like the SM movies either has a misconception of what Spider-Man is or never read the comics.


I thought he slouched.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"