Sabretooth said:If Spider-Man was made back in the day,Michael J. Fox would've been one of the greatest Peter Parkers in his prime.
Spider-Man was never tall. And it's not too hard to add a couple inches with the camera.RedIsNotBlue said:Too short. Other than that yeah.
Lunar_Wolf said:If Spider-man 4 gets made and Tobey it not in it as he only signed a contract for 3 movies, who do you think would be a great Spider-man to replace Tobey?![]()
Sabretooth said:Spider-Man was never tall. And it's not too hard to add a couple inches with the camera.
Boy Zeppo said:Michael J Fox would have ruled.
But now Seth Green should be Spidey... I don't think the height thing is an issue cause it doesnt define Spider-man.... I think that he's an everyman so he needs to look Joe Normal and unimpressive as Parker
Sabretooth said:Spider-Man was never tall. And it's not too hard to add a couple inches with the camera.
chiefchirpa said:Spider-man is 5'10". That's above average height. Some people are still mistaken Spider-man with the Ultimate version. Ultimate Spider-man height is around 5'8" but he's 15.
If you're short and you need a superhero to represent, get Wolverine
ShadowBoxing said:Anyone who doesn't like the SM movies either has a misconception of what Spider-Man is or never read the comics.
Eddie Dean said:If John Cusack was younger, he would make the perfect Spider-Man.
blind_fury said:Enough with Maguire already! He's not even a good Spider-man. His voice sounds nothing like Spider-man should sound like. His demeaner and personality is NOTHING like Peter Parker or Spider-man from comics and television. He sleeps walks through the role just like his partner in crime Kirsten "looks/acts nothing like MJ" Dunst.
ShadowBoxing said:Spider-Man has always been played off as short. In the comics he is always drawfed by other heroes like Captain America, Iron Man, the X-Men, DareDevil, etc. It's kind of integral to his character which is that of the meek one, the one who is insecure amongst all these greater heroes. Spider-Man is suppose to be short, because outside of his costume (and frequently in it) he is the one who is stepped on, unnoticed and trampled. Between the Daily Bugle decrying his pressence, the girl troubles, the job woes, the worrisome Aunt May...he is the quinessential little guy. I have no idea why people hate the 1st and second films. Aside from getting almost every character right (aside from MJ's look) it captured to essence of the comic. The over the top villians, the corny dialogue, the geekish and insecure Peter Parker...it also like Spider-Man focused on Peter Parker...which Spider-Man has always done. Amazing Spider-Man (especially under Stan Lee) read like a soap opera/sitcom where villians made guest appearances. The life problem Peter was facing would be interrupted by a villian. Anyone who doesn't like the SM movies either has a misconception of what Spider-Man is or never read the comics.