Who's Hotter, Dunst or Howard?

Who's Hotter?

  • Kirsten Dunst

  • Bryce Howard


Results are only viewable after voting.
Now, if we were talking about ANY of the women in the Spidey films...

Liz Banks blows these two out of the water.
 
cmill216 said:
Look, I've seen BOTH nude (not personally, dumba$$es), and Dunst's tatas are not significantly bigger than Howard's.

I have not seen bryce nude, but I have seen dunst nude, and they are signifigantly larger than these

cb20_gb1_bryce20dallas20howard202_t.jpg


my own pecks are larger than those and I'm a skinny guy. there is a big difference. even when they aren't nude you can tell by the cleavage.
 
cmill216 said:
When God created the Earth, he also created Google. ;)

I'm kinda at work, so I'm not going to search for it, but lets say I got a link PMed to me, that would be easier to do
 
JokerNick said:
I'm kinda at work, so I'm not going to search for it, but lets say I got a link PMed to me, that would be easier to do

Dude, I'm not a supplier of porn. When you get home, have fun! :D
 
kirsten_dunst_003.jpg


those are way bigger than bryces. and it's obviously not the product of water bras or push up bras.
 
cmill216 said:
Now, if we were talking about ANY of the women in the Spidey films...

Liz Banks blows these two out of the water.

****ing AMEN... :ghost::up::ghost::up: I love Betty!!!!!
 
Well... Dunst appears to have something there... she just has to get the hair back and keep her mouth closed and she'll be fine...
 
Spider-Bite said:
I have not seen bryce nude, but I have seen dunst nude, and they are signifigantly larger than these

cb20_gb1_bryce20dallas20howard202_t.jpg


my own pecks are larger than those and I'm a skinny guy. there is a big difference. even when they aren't nude you can tell by the cleavage.

Okay....what's your point again? That Kirsten is automatically hotter because she has bigger breasts? What if Bryce had a bigger a$$? Now what?
 
cmill216 said:
Dude, I'm not a supplier of porn. When you get home, have fun! :D

o yes you are!!!!!!!!

I'm just playing anyways
 
FaT_tONle said:
Well... Dunst appears to have something there... she just has to get the hair back and keep her mouth closed and she'll be fine...

oh I know. I'm just talking body there. body isn't everything but it counts a lot.
 
JokerNick said:
I'm kinda at work, so I'm not going to search for it, but lets say I got a link PMed to me, that would be easier to do

dude google it. we can't supply porn on here becuase well get banned. you can find a few on google. there is one where she's coming out of the water and her breasts are completely hanging out of her swim suit and you can see everything, but her face looks all weird cause you can tell she's squinting bad cause the sun is in her eyes.
 
Just to defend Dunst for all the sh:t she gets on these boards... I'm not one to believe this girl lost it over night... let's just have some faith on this one... I'm sure she'll be a lot better than SM2...
 
cmill216 said:
Okay....what's your point again? That Kirsten is automatically hotter because she has bigger breasts? What if Bryce had a bigger a$$? Now what?

well it's not that dunsts are bigger, it's that Bryce practically doesn't have any. but for my own personal taste after breasts, ass comes in second on the list of important physical features, followed by legs, and then last but not least face.

of course were just talking physical features here. an orgasm is still an orgasm regardless, and a nice person is still a nice person regardless.
 
I gotta go. I still give props to bryce for doing what she has to for the role. at least she cares about how she looks in the spidey movies where as it appeared that Dunst did not. And that does count for something. Dunst still might look better naked, but for peter's love interest, I prefer an actress who will care about how she looks in the movie.
 
Spider-Bite said:
well it's not that dunsts are bigger, it's that Bryce practically doesn't have any. but for my own personal taste after breasts, ass comes in second on the list of important physical features, followed by legs, and then last but not least face.

So she could look like Sasquatch, but if she had nice legs, a round booty, and a decent rack, you'd hit it?! To...each...his...own.
 
cmill216 said:
So she could look like Sasquatch, but if she had nice legs, a round booty, and a decent rack, you'd hit it?! To...each...his...own.

well I didn't think we were taking extremities into consideration here. I'm yet to see any girl as hairy as the sasquatch.
 
No one eight feet tall is going to have nice legs... give him a break cmill
 
Spider-Bite said:
well I didn't think we were taking extremities into consideration here.

Dude, you said LEGS before a girl's FACE. :confused: Do extremities really matter at this point? :O
 
you guys argue over the dumbest things....:confused:
 
cmill216 said:
Dude, you said LEGS before a girl's FACE. :confused: Do extremities really matter at this point? :O

well what I mean is I would pic a girl with a good body over a girl with a good face, as long as it's still a normal face. she can't look like Venom or the Thing. Even if her face is somewhat unattractive as long as she still has a human face it's all good.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,326
Messages
22,086,152
Members
45,885
Latest member
RadioactiveMan
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"