Daredevil Why a TV series for Daredevil?

Who was saying it's inferior?

I think DD is a big enough hero in his own right to warrant the big screen treatment.It's stuff like Heroes for Hire,Moon Knight,etc that would benefit most from a series,since they really don't have a prayer of getting a big budget movie made.

Except a lot of people think TV is a better story telling medium then Movies nowadays, so you could say DD is being given another chance to make his mark in a medium that tells better stories then Movies nowadays.

I don't see how a TV series is a step down for DD, its not he isn't "big enough" for movies, its that perhaps his stories can be better translated with a TV series.

Frankly though I think most live action superhero TV shows are not very good, but those were Network TV. I am hoping that with this being on Netflix, it will be the best live action super hero TV show. House of Cards is better then pretty well everything they show on the Networks.

Plus Disney has said that if these Netflix shows do well, they may give some of these characters the Silver Screen treatment. So hey, maybe DD will get a movie after all, just not right away. He is been given a chance in other media, how lots of other super heroes don't get that chance.
 
It's because Marvel's plate when it comes to films is full but Daredevil can be done on a TV budget.

Ant-Man and Doctor Strange are both going to be film franchises and there's also been talk of Captain Marvel, Black Panther and Inhumans. That's going to cause Marvel to have to step up their production and release schedule for Phase 3 by releasing 3 films a year and/or extending Phase 3 by another year. (Personally, I feel like BP and Inhumans can wait for Phase 4.) That plus a Ghost Rider reboot will need a massive budget to pull off correctly. Now if Sony decides to sell the Spider-Man rights since the last three films have been less than well-received critically or if Fox's Fantastic Four reverts because the film is a massive bomb, then that'll put Marvel Studios in the position of making four films a year. That's a full slate for any studio and I can't see Marvel pumping out more without hurting the brand by oversaturation.

Other properties like the announced Netflix series along with other properties like Blade, Moon Knight, Punisher, Runaways, She-Hulk, Black Widow, Hawkeye and Winter Soldier can be done on a TV show's budget. When the most expensive costuming choices of any of these involves green body paint, that's an obvious choice for television instead of a full feature film since the marketing budget would be too high to compensate for the lack of special effects.

Keep in mind when looking at what's likely going to be Phase 3

2015 Ant-Man
2016 Captain America 3, Doctor Strange
2017 Thor 3, Guardians/Hulk Crossover
2018 Captain Marvel, Avengers 3

It's obvious to say that Marvel has it's hands full right now. Then when you consider that Phase 4 is going to involve a fourth Iron Man film alongside Black Panther and the Inhumans with three films a year + competition from DC + Fox's films + an animated Power Pack film if Big Hero Six works, there will usually be a superhero film in theaters at all times and no room for street level heroes.

Keep in mind that everyone I listed aside from Punisher and the Runaways has been an Avenger and Marvel Studios has stated that if the Netflix series are successful, we could see them on the big screen, it's safe to say that most of these characters will be joining the Avengers except for Black Widow and Hawkeye who are already members of the team.

Even aside from oversaturation and budget reasons, Marvel wants to introduce properties to other mediums. They're involved in Publishing and film, but branching into other mediums is how the brand stays fresh. Agents of SHIELD is cool but they have to poach villains from other heroes or invent their own. Agent Carter on the other hand can introduce a Previous Madame Hydra before Viper takes on the role as well as Heinrich Zemo as the father to Helmut along with Nick Fury Sr. but a prequel series has next to no crossover potential and is even more limited by what characters it can use.

Bringing A and B-list heroes to TV allows for more interesting villains along with more crossover potential. So if you can do a character cheap, find a way to have Scarlett Johannsson and Robert Downey Jr cameo in Phase 3, branch into another medium, save on marketing, expand the roster of the Avengers and introduce enough villains for a potential Thunderbolts film, then why shouldn't Marvel do Daredevil on TV?
 
Ant-Man and Doctor Strange are both going to be film franchises and there's also been talk of Captain Marvel, Black Panther and Inhumans. That's going to cause Marvel to have to step up their production and release schedule for Phase 3 by releasing 3 films a year and/or extending Phase 3 by another year. (Personally, I feel like BP and Inhumans can wait for Phase 4.)

Have you heard something recently, because everything I've heard places Black Panther and Inhumans in Phase 4.
 
It's hard to say as Marvel has been playing their Phase Three plans close to the chest. They've confirmed Ant Man, Doctor Strange, and Cap 3, that's it. I personally think that if they do make an Inhumans movie, that it'll be in Phase 4 at the earliest. However, BP is more of a question mark at this point. I could potentially see them doing him in Phase 3, or Captain Marvel.
 
You catch a blind guy from the streets and a kid sleeping in the floor next to a truck,wait OMG that's Daredevil...
 
Because Daredevil doesn't need a massive budget. The only popular villain of his who has any sort of natural energy projection is Typhoid. I mean, look at Bullseye, Elektra, Kingpin, Mister Fear, Gladiator, Bullet, Ikari and Nuke. They're all either powered by technology or their own fighting skills.

So when Marvel has plenty of characters who need a full film budget to do right like Thor, Iron Man and Hulk (along with the upcoming Ant-Man, Doctor Strange, Black Panther and Ms Marvel) all competing for screen time and Captain America and Black Widow already appearing in feature films with there even being talk of a Black Widow movie in the works, it's hard for Marvel to introduce new franchises.

Now consider that of Marvel's remaining heroes, Ghost Rider also needs a film budget. That doesn't leave a lot of room for street-level heroes to come into play in theaters.

And this is a great development. It means that we're getting Luke Cage, Iron Fist and Jessica Jones with the possibility for She-Hulk, Moon Knight, Blade and Punisher down the line. If Marvel is doing four films a year, this is the ONLY way that we're going to get these characters at all since there won't be enough room for them when special effects heavy properties like Thunderbolts and Nova are going to be competing.

And if Sinister Six flops, with Sony's financial problems, they'll probably sell the rights back at a time when Marvel Studios has Phase 3 mapped out until 2019 and films lined up until 2028. A street-level TV-verse for Spidey to play around in if/when he returns is probably the best way forward for a character who'll be seen as damaged goods.
 
My info is out of date now, so it's not worth finding the link. The statements at the time was that Marvel was looking for a New Avengers for Phase 4 that would have characters like Black Panther and Carol Danvers as centerpieces. However, recent comments have suggested a groundswell of support that Kevin Fiege has acknowledged might force them to reevaluate their plans.
 
I never heard anything along those lines

Sounds like speculation
 
It could have been, but it wasn't reported as speculation. This was from before Dr. Strange was announced as official. Anyway, it's all academic now.
 
Good points, im a follower of Law & Order:SVU and i enjoy the courtroom stuff there. I hope the Daredevil show will have similar scenes. Which im almost positive it will. Maybe Marvel should try to snag some Law & Order writers and directors?

That would be great. There are some good episodes around. Even get a few other L&O actors on the show apart from D'Onofrio.
 
I think due to the failure of the Daredevil movie and the fact that Marvel has so may ideas in other Marvel heroes, they felt Daredevil was the way to BRANCH in a tv SERIES SO hopefully we also see Daredevil in the Avengers .
 
Why would we see Daredevil on the Avengers? He has no business being involved in their affairs whatsoever.
 
matt Murdoch could be legal council to one or all the avengers
 
I don't really want to see any of these shows crossing over into movies. They should just stick to their street level thing. I wouldn't mind if we got a few references in the movie or something though.
 
matt Murdoch could be legal council to one or all the avengers

That's a terrible idea. Why would they need him as legal counsel? And why would that lead Daredevil to be a part of the team. It's a hokey Silver Age concept that has no place the modern world.
 
Why would we see Daredevil on the Avengers? He has no business being involved in their affairs whatsoever.

Because Bendis, that's why. Though I thought :daredevil should have been an Avenger a long time ago.
 
That's a terrible idea. Why would they need him as legal counsel? And why would that lead Daredevil to be a part of the team. It's a hokey Silver Age concept that has no place the modern world.

That's part of what made the concept of Matt being a lawyer great,that he would find himself representing certain heroes.It's made to order for the MCU's interconnected universe.
 
True. Doesn't mean Marvel won't use his Avengers run in the movies at some point. Age of Ultron was one of his stories...

The only think they are using from Age Of Ultron is the name. By all accounts the plot is completely different.
 
That's part of what made the concept of Matt being a lawyer great,that he would find himself representing certain heroes.It's made to order for the MCU's interconnected universe.

I have no problem with him representing other characters (although in their human form, not as a superhero). I think it's absurdly hokey to make him The Avengers in-house counsel.
 
The Avengers should have their own in-house counsel anyway, in the form of Jennifer Walters aka She-Hulk, who was one of the established Avengers in the comics. Since she keeps less of a low profile, it seems more like she would be the one to represent rather than Murdock.
 
She-Hulk first better, although I'm still not a big fan of the concept. They're superheroes, they shouldn't have to worry about being sued.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,327
Messages
22,086,563
Members
45,885
Latest member
RadioactiveMan
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"