redhawk23
Wrestlin'
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2008
- Messages
- 17,137
- Reaction score
- 293
- Points
- 73
First off, if you aren't familiar with FilmCritHulk, seek out his work immediately. He is one of the most intelligent commenters on any subject, particuarly on movies and games, that you are ever likely to come across, even if you disagree with him.
Recently FilmCritHulk has been regularly writing articles for Badass Digest.
More recently another writer on the site posted a long list and rant of everything he hates about movies. Every pet peeve you could possibly imagine.
To combat this superbly negative view of movies and everything that they do, FilmCritHulk offers a counter arguement, Why You (and he) Love Movies.
It's a very good list of reasons, and well worth reading (which you can do here http://badassdigest.com/2012/02/05/why-you-love-movies/), but I must ask, why do you love movies? Is it just a general effect, or are there, as with some of the reasons Hulk offers, specific moments that sum up what movies can do for you and why you love them?
For me personally this scene absolutely sum up what I love about movies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtbOmpTnyOc&feature=player_detailpage#t=91s
Skip to the 1:31 mark.
[YT]qtbOmpTnyOc&feature=player_detailpage#t=91s[/YT]
This clip from one of my favorite movies, 2001: A Space Odyssey portrays, a moment from the distant past, essentially at the very invention of warfare. The ape-man hurls his newly minted weapon towards the sky and the film cuts to an outerspace view of what can be known from the AC Clarke novel of the story to be an orbital weapons platform. One quick cut, jumping from out most distant ancestral history to what was then the not so distant future, and the film sums up human history up until now, or at least a certain interpretation of it.
Now I can't be certain that our ape ancestors would have even been plentiful enough to need to fight for resources, and our use of space in 2001 failed to meet the expectations of the 1960, but that ultimately doesn't matter. The film didn't have to actually have to reflect the past or the future to posit a reality like no other medium can, and use it to comment on its present, it's cultural context and humanity, once again as no other medium really can.
That got a bit long winded, but for me, once again, that single shot is dense with meaning, for others it may mean something else, or nothing at all. That's art in general, but the way movies lets us potentially actually experience or observe a moment in time I think opens up this potential even more.
That is why I love movies.
How about you?
Recently FilmCritHulk has been regularly writing articles for Badass Digest.
More recently another writer on the site posted a long list and rant of everything he hates about movies. Every pet peeve you could possibly imagine.
To combat this superbly negative view of movies and everything that they do, FilmCritHulk offers a counter arguement, Why You (and he) Love Movies.
It's a very good list of reasons, and well worth reading (which you can do here http://badassdigest.com/2012/02/05/why-you-love-movies/), but I must ask, why do you love movies? Is it just a general effect, or are there, as with some of the reasons Hulk offers, specific moments that sum up what movies can do for you and why you love them?
For me personally this scene absolutely sum up what I love about movies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtbOmpTnyOc&feature=player_detailpage#t=91s
Skip to the 1:31 mark.
[YT]qtbOmpTnyOc&feature=player_detailpage#t=91s[/YT]
This clip from one of my favorite movies, 2001: A Space Odyssey portrays, a moment from the distant past, essentially at the very invention of warfare. The ape-man hurls his newly minted weapon towards the sky and the film cuts to an outerspace view of what can be known from the AC Clarke novel of the story to be an orbital weapons platform. One quick cut, jumping from out most distant ancestral history to what was then the not so distant future, and the film sums up human history up until now, or at least a certain interpretation of it.
Now I can't be certain that our ape ancestors would have even been plentiful enough to need to fight for resources, and our use of space in 2001 failed to meet the expectations of the 1960, but that ultimately doesn't matter. The film didn't have to actually have to reflect the past or the future to posit a reality like no other medium can, and use it to comment on its present, it's cultural context and humanity, once again as no other medium really can.
That got a bit long winded, but for me, once again, that single shot is dense with meaning, for others it may mean something else, or nothing at all. That's art in general, but the way movies lets us potentially actually experience or observe a moment in time I think opens up this potential even more.
That is why I love movies.
How about you?