Halo 2 didn't look as pretty as its announcement trailer.Master Chief said:Don't see why they wouldn't.
Boom said:Halo 2 didn't look as pretty as its announcement trailer.
THAT'S WHAT I LIKE TO HEAR, BOY. WORT WORT WORT .Master Chief said:Only because they were limited by the XBox hardware. When you look at the 360 games out now like Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter and to a certain extent Call of Duty 2, there's no reason for the graphics to be brought down.
It did for a while, but development issues caused the need for the lighting engine to be replaced with a worse one, and some effects to leave altogether.Boom said:Halo 2 didn't look as pretty as its announcement trailer.
But Halo:CE was perfect .Mr. Credible said:as far as next gen goes (or this gen, depending on how you classify it) graphics aren't going to be the problem. at least not until we have a few games/consoles to compare against eachother.
i have no doubts that halo 3 will look great, but is it just going to be a prettier halo 2? or halo 1? that's the real problem. quake 4 looked great, but the gameplay was the same recycled crap we've seen since doom, so...
Boom said:But Halo:CE was perfect .
Mr. Credible said:no... it wasn't.
it's an above average, and totally generic FPS, nothing more.