Will Man-Boobs ever be considered taboo?

[WompuM]

Do you think that in 1000 years or whatnot that a bare man's chest will ever be considered as "naked" as a bare female's chest. Such that seeing a topless man in a movie would give it an R rating and that people will look back on us and think "Damn, they had a bunch of naked gusy running around back then." similar to the way we look at those naked ladies in National Geographic and consider them barbaric?

Honestly, this thread was 100% inspired by Triplet's avi.

 

[SapphirePrima]

no cause they're disgusting and weird.

 

[Darth Elektra]

No, I dont think so.

 

[tzarinna]

Who is Triplet?

 

[SapphirePrima]

Who is Triplet?

A poster. She is usually in the Smallville forums

 

[The Man Of 16]

in 1000 years, evolution (or natural selection to the religious) will divide the population into 2 different groups. The ugly stupid and fat people, and the smart and sexy people. This will actually happen in the next 100 to 200 years. In 1000 years we will understand that religion has no place in public decisions and we will have aborted and wiped out the ugly fat and stupid race.

Which in turn means that no one will know what being fat was and there will be no need for restrictions on man-boobs because no one will know what they are.

 

[Majik1387]

Men used to be fully naked 1000s of years ago. I think people are happy when men arre covered up some.

None of the people I know though.

 

[Asteroid-Man]

It's gonna get worse, not better.

 

[Morg]

Do you think that in 1000 years or whatnot that a bare man's chest will ever be considered as "naked" as a bare female's chest. Such that seeing a topless man in a movie would give it an R rating and that people will look back on us and think "Damn, they had a bunch of naked gusy running around back then." similar to the way we look at those naked ladies in National Geographic and consider them barbaric?

Honestly, this thread was 100% inspired by Triplet's avi.

I think the human race be extint before a 1,000 years so the question moot

 

[The Man Of 16]

Do you think that in 1000 years or whatnot that a bare man's chest will ever be considered as "naked" as a bare female's chest. Such that seeing a topless man in a movie would give it an R rating and that people will look back on us and think "Damn, they had a bunch of naked gusy running around back then." similar to the way we look at those naked ladies in National Geographic and consider them barbaric?

Honestly, this thread was 100% inspired by Triplet's avi.

I think its interesting how were allowed to show a baby girl naked on tv (diaper ads, etc) but theres a strong negative vibe against naked pictures of kids. I guess when those pictures pay the networks, its alright.

(to clarify, i hate those commercials)

 

[Kritish]

I don't understand why it's taboo for female boobs to be shown.

 

[Morg]

I don't understand why it's taboo for female boobs to be shown.

on tv? FCC hit you with a million dollar fine

 

[Majik1387]

I don't understand why it's taboo for female boobs to be shown.

Because they can produce milk...




...the real ones can...





...I don't know.

 

[The Man Of 16]

Because the US was founded on religion ( a huge mistake) and christianity and all of its sub-religions is a sex negative religion. Boobs are sexually fun therefore theyre evil in the eyes of nuns who inadvertantly run the country through religion.

 

[Kritish]

on tv? FCC hit you with a million dollar fine

FCC

Facist
Commie
****s

 

[The Man Of 16]

smells like agreement.