• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

Will Watchmen Kill the Comic-Book Movie?

Kane52630

mmmm something in the wayyy mmmmhmmmm
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
121,593
Reaction score
59,449
Points
218
a very interesting artice
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2009/03/zack_snyder_killing_comic_book.html

As we enter the final week of what has been a seemingly interminable period of Watchmen prerelease marketing hype, we'll admit that our high expectations for the film have been somewhat tempered by the early reactions that hit the Internets last week (our own David Edelstein called the movie "an awe-inspiring corpse"). Harry Knowles's undying affection aside, we can't help but think that industry insiders will be lowering their projections for how the film will open as the week progresses. Not really helping matters much, "visionary" director Zack Snyder went on the record in an interview with the Los Angeles Times this weekend stating his ultimate desire for the long-gestating project: "We're killing the comic-book movie, we're ending it. This movie is the last comic-book movie, for good or bad."

Don't worry, fanboys, Hollywood has no intentions of putting an end to one of the most audience-pleasing film genres they've got going these days. And besides, if the genre was able to survive mid-nineties atrocities like The Shadow and The Phantom, there's really no way that Watchmen could kill it, no matter what the film's Rotten Tomatoes rating ends up being. What Snyder is really talking about is the darkness at the core of the subject:


"[The success of The Dark Knight] means that deconstruction of the superhero is something you can do. All those movies have led to a point where we can finally have Watchmen with a Superman character who doesn't want to save the world and a Batman who has trouble in bed. Essentially, I want to kill the superhero movie because now we can."


Somehow, we don't think that was the pitch that Snyder used to get the project made in the first place. And besides, if his admission that the film is the anti-comic-book movie doesn't strike fear in the hearts of box-office prognosticators everywhere, don't forget about the not-so-little matter of Dr. Manhattan's "massive and uncircumcised" penis. We can't imagine that will exactly get the crowds lining up out in the Heartlands.
 
so it all boils down to a big, blue penis?
 
Whether Watchmen is a hit, flop or under-performer, this won't "kill" the comic-book film genre. If it succeeds, then the story will be, "See? Audiences do want more dark comic-movies!" And if it fails, it becomes, "Well, it was never going to appeal to most people and we still got our Watchmen film regardless!"

Although I agree that many are over-estimating how this will do with mainstream film-goers.
 
'Uncircumcised'? :eek:

My God, this film is doomed.
 
Last edited:
WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH THESE MORONS!!!!
WHO THE **** CARES ABOUT MANHATTAN'S DONG!!!!

What about the strong messages and political satire? :waa:
 
Strong messages and political satire are, unfortunately, nothing in comparison to a dirty penis that looks like a blue elephant's trunk.
 
Haha.

All in favour of the 'Blue Penis Petition' say Ay!
 
Haha.

All in favour of the 'Blue Penis Petition' say Ay!
 
by killing i think he means the comic book movie cliche, it's going to blow the genre wide open...

saying that i think other graphic novels have managed that. road to perdition and other ones that aren't as well known but they do it so well that they slip under the radar completely.

by trying so so hard to not be a comic book movie, it will be one but the audiences won't recognise what it's supposed to be doing and just end up a forgotten memory.

for something like watchmen to work in another genre, it would work well in animation especially US animation where the genre is pretty much entirely dominated by children's work. The characters being heroes isn't so important but the film is about breaking cliches of characters.

i think the cliches of what a comic book can offer have already been broken and thus this will become a cliche of trying to be a cliche.
 
I think Snyder is being a bit close to the project if he thinks Watchmen will redefine (or end) the genre. It will likely just be a showcase piece if the film succeeds. But yes, many critics and writers are using condescending language to describe Snyder's newest film and are getting caught up on the nudity, because they do not think there is anything worth considering as art in the film. And maybe there isn't. But the tone of the prose is ridiculous.
 
Neutrality is lost on these people.. they find one little problem and they exaggerate it...
I'm surprised nobody is complaining about the slow-mo...
This was bound to happen... Watchmen is a bit too complex and not something for casual movie goers...

It's like the pulp version of Citizen Kane... an elitist kind of movie which casual people aren't really able to enjoy...
 
It was TDK that killed it. A whole year ago.

Watchmen (movie version) is a joyride in the book's playground, and that's it.
 
I never noticed that Dr. Manhattan was uncircumsized.

Guess I didn't pay attention?
 
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Is this buttmunch serious? I just cannot understand the stupid hang up's people are taking issue with.
 
It was TDK that killed it. A whole year ago.

Watchmen (movie version) is a joyride in the book's playground, and that's it.

I'd sort of agree with that. I think whatever the article is talking about, TDK's done most of the legwork already.
 
Ostermann? and uncircumsized? Consider that with a name like Ostermann you're pretty much guaranteed to be a heeb (I'm using the term affectionately, also it's not an offensive term anyway).

One thing that confuses me, is Kill uses as bulls*it marketing language for make it grow up? Because if so Batman Begins did that about 4 years ago. Oh and screw TDK it was overwrought and too long for it's own good, it also failed to build anything upon Begins, but I'm veering offtopic.
 
Last edited:
I'd sort of agree with that. I think whatever the article is talking about, TDK's done most of the legwork already.

I second it. I normally prefer to write longer posts than that, but there's not a lot else for me to say.
 
Wholeheartedly agree with hatebox and Mercurius. If Watchmen came first to the theatres, Snyder (depending how on the film will be recieved by audiences) would've had a point to his statement.

As it is, it belongs to Nolan.
 
I agree that much of the thunder were already stolen by Nolan and TDK, and now Watchmen is just going to push the envelope a little further.
 
doesnt matter. I can love any superhero movie. Check the sig for proof.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"