You guys are living in Michigan and Maryland. I rest my case.![]()
I know, I'm from Michigan.
Was that the one clever quip of the year people from Michigan are allowed to express? The rest of the year is booked full with being racist, depressed and polluted.
hahahahahahahaah
The bad part is that I agree with you. We're only not depressed when we're drunk.
See, here's the thing...Wolverine, like any other character, is great when handled by the CORRECT writer. Somewhere between Onslaught and now, they decided that all that made Wolverine cool was his hack/slash attitude and claws, whereas what made him so cool a character was his Clint Eastwood-like quality. He was the silent badass who didn't say much, and who, for the most part, clung to the background until he was needed to step in and do what he does best. NOT that he was flawless and the only one who could win fights.
Wolverine was a multi-dimensional character once he joined the X-Men. He had depth, mystery, a complex personality. He provided a good foil for Cyclops' goody-goody nature, and competition for Jean as women love the bad boy. Though the X-Men were like his family and the X-Mansion the only place he considered home, he always felt like an outsider amongst outsiders and kept his distance. He fought to control the animal nature inside, he had extensive training which he used to the fullest from the simplest hunt to saving his allies. He was hardly a genius, but when he spoke there was a wisdom behind the words that only comes with experience.
THAT was Wolverine.
This character that's been running around for a while is NOT. It's a characature. It's a What If? gone wrong. He's obnoxious, in your face, nothing more than two sets of claws (and FYI, there's a smoking ban at Marvel so he hasn't lit-up in a few years now). Marvel thinks that's all there is to the character, and the writers do little to disporve it.
You wanna see the REAL Wolverine? Go read CLASSIC Claremont. Go read Larry Hama. Go read any book before the mid 1990s, then come back here and tell us that he was everything he is now.
Y'know, we have an Upper Peninsula. We could slap Maryland too.
Difference being that half of those titles are devoted to Batman as is. You don't need to read them. Wolverine, although it's becoming less frequent, has the tendency to show up just anywhere, and you can't help but read a Wolverine story.You know one of these days someone's gonna work out exactly why it is that when Wolverine shows up in three hundred comics a week it's annoying as ****, but when Batman shows up in three hundred and fourteen comics a week it's like eh, no big.
I mean rationally I should find the latter as godawfully annoying as the former bug for some reason no, I can shrug off any ten million appearances of Batty McBats but somehow five million appearances of Wolvie von Wolverinington is just four point five million too goddamn many.
That'd require the Yoopers to uncross their eyes long enough to aim a slap.
Batman's also more the kind of character who's logically bound to show up in a lot of places. He's a behind-the-scenes manipulator with his fingers in many pies all the time. Wolverine is just a dude who runs around trying to cut people. He's not the type to be keeping track of people and popping up when they least expect it like Batman is.Difference being that half of those titles are devoted to Batman as is. You don't need to read them. Wolverine, although it's becoming less frequent, has the tendency to show up just anywhere, and you can't help but read a Wolverine story.
Can someone tell me why this losers so popular? He's a short little runt, he throws temper tantrums, his second hand smoke is killing the other X-Men, he can barely form a complete sentence, bub, and maybe worst of all, he is a filthy little mutant, like a great number of posters who have bad mouthed me here.
I'm tired of your posts.![]()
See, here's the thing...Wolverine, like any other character, is great when handled by the CORRECT writer. Somewhere between Onslaught and now, they decided that all that made Wolverine cool was his hack/slash attitude and claws, whereas what made him so cool a character was his Clint Eastwood-like quality. He was the silent badass who didn't say much, and who, for the most part, clung to the background until he was needed to step in and do what he does best. NOT that he was flawless and the only one who could win fights.
Wolverine was a multi-dimensional character once he joined the X-Men. He had depth, mystery, a complex personality. He provided a good foil for Cyclops' goody-goody nature, and competition for Jean as women love the bad boy. Though the X-Men were like his family and the X-Mansion the only place he considered home, he always felt like an outsider amongst outsiders and kept his distance. He fought to control the animal nature inside, he had extensive training which he used to the fullest from the simplest hunt to saving his allies. He was hardly a genius, but when he spoke there was a wisdom behind the words that only comes with experience.
THAT was Wolverine.
This character that's been running around for a while is NOT. It's a characature. It's a What If? gone wrong. He's obnoxious, in your face, nothing more than two sets of claws (and FYI, there's a smoking ban at Marvel so he hasn't lit-up in a few years now). Marvel thinks that's all there is to the character, and the writers do little to disporve it.
You wanna see the REAL Wolverine? Go read CLASSIC Claremont. Go read Larry Hama. Go read any book before the mid 1990s, then come back here and tell us that he was everything he is now.