It had been, without any changes, first released in 2009 or 2010?
Given the financial crash and recession and associated protests against The 1%, would Stark's wealth and hedonism/initial amorality have seemed tone-deaf and unappealing?
Or would the film been changed to avoid those controversies? Or even without changes would the audiences still have been willing to accept the character and story as fantasy and redemption?
Given the financial crash and recession and associated protests against The 1%, would Stark's wealth and hedonism/initial amorality have seemed tone-deaf and unappealing?
Or would the film been changed to avoid those controversies? Or even without changes would the audiences still have been willing to accept the character and story as fantasy and redemption?