Traumatic experiences like that can totally twist a person's mind.
Yes, if you spend the time exploring it, and it's connection to OTHER incidents. By itself, it doesn't neccessarily make them become EVIL. Why does not being able to prevent her friend from dying or "feeling" it make Jean evil? In STAR WARS, Anakin becomes evil because he desires POWER, and he lets that desire for power make him seek out the dark side, which promises him more power...which he wants to use to save Padme from her "fate" (In fact, most of Anakin's story in REVENGE OF THE SITH is about these intersections of plot and thematics).
But... it's just an obviously "we're writing out Cyclops and giving you his role" moment. It's not handled well at all. Even the writers admitted as much. So much more could have been done to actually make it a worthwhile arc. But the whole thing just wreaked of "we're writing out Cyclops, here you go Halle, here's his role"
What would be "handling" something like that "well" for you? I'll admit that it feels like they're writing out Cyclops (politically speaking) but that's not ALL there is to that scene. There are a number of good moments to it. And moments that do build on Storm from previous movies.
The scene itself does indicate that though. Cyclops was supposed to get the school. That much was implied in X-Men.
Maybe if you read an awful lot into it. There's nothing definitively shown. All that was implied in X-MEN was that if anything happened to Xavier, Cyclops would take care of "them". I always took that to mean the X-Men. "taking care of" doesn't mean "I'll take over your school". It means "I'll take care of our family". Since we never once saw him teach a class, I'm not sure he COULD have taken over the school. The X-Men, sure. The school, not so much. And besides...how can Cyclops "take care of them" when he's dead? It's not like the writers contradicted anything written in the story? I'm sure, had he been alive, that Cyclops would have loved to have taken care of them.
The scene just wreaks of "Oh yea, I'm gonna get killed off later in the film, and we're killing off Cyclops so he can't take over the school. So that character arc that was supposed to be his, yea, it's going to you now."
That's called foreshadowing. It's a tool good writers use. There is ONE moment where writers/director indicate that Cyclops will carry on Xavier's vision in X-MEN. None in X2. Granted, it's a great moment, but it's a single moment, and there's nothing to it about "Cyclops must take over the school". It's mostly a scene to show that Cyclops believes in Xavier's dream and will carry on if at all possible. Whereas there are multiple scenes of Storm teaching students, caring for them, etc. It's a logical progression to her arc, whether you like the politics behind it or not. It's entirely possible that even if Cyclops had survived in the movie, Storm would still be taking over the school, and Cyclops would be handling the X-Men. And besides, Cyclops is dead. I'm sure if he survived, he'd be happy to take care of them.
He broke them out because he was building an army.
I know why he broke them out. I was asking the question to make a point. A point which you missed. He broke them out of prison. They clearly seem to feel that they owe him (as he freed them). And by the way, actually showing a reason they might want to join Magneto (some sense of loyalty) is more motivation for joining Magneto than even Mystique has gotten in three films. Sabertooth and Toad were given none at all. And I don't care whether him recruiting for his army is a plot point or not.
Callisto and the Morlocks hated the humans just as much as Magneto did. And even KNEW what his purpose was. And even they were a bit skeptical. But we actually see him convince them to join his cause.
And they seemingly joined him for the same damn reason Multiple Man did. They have talents he can use (Magneto makes it clear he's only interested in Calliso until after he realizes she has powers). Didn't you just whine about that being the only reason Multiple Man joined him?
Multiple Man and Juggernaut had no idea who this guy was. They blindly followed him. I don't care how much you do stuff for kicks, you don't just blindly follow along with somebody.
How the heck do you know what they would and wouldn't do? Multiple Man is CLEARLY played as happy-go-lucky. In TWO scenes. I can absolutely believe he'd go along with Magneto for kicks. Hell, the actor even plays it that way.
And the fact that Callisto, Quill, and Arclight DIDN'T know who he was indicates that he's not known. Of course Pyro would come off that Magneto is some important figure. Pyro believes in his cause, and would follow him to the end.
Magneto's actions have to be known in some fashion. Whether Callisto, Quill and Arclight know who Magneto is is pretty relevant. They know what he stands for, and they know he's powerful.
The difference between Sabretooth, Toad, and Mystique in X-Men is that part of the arc of that film did NOT include Magneto recruiting them for his cause. Part of the arc of X-Men: The Last Stand WAS Magneto recruiting for his army. And for the most part, we got a good indication of that. NOT with Multiple Man and Juggernaut, however, whom just blindly joined him and became his blind followers, willing to sacrifice themselves for his cause that they don't know what it is.
Magneto gives all the mutants the same pitch. It's entirely possible he gave Multiple Man and Juggernaut and all the other mutants he recruits the same pitch. We just don't see it. I mean, you can ***** till the cows come home that we don't see exactly why Multiple Man and Juggernaut join Magneto, but odds are, they hate humans, they want to fight against the cure (which will eventually be meant for them), and so forth.
Yea, I was obviously exaggerating. The point is, Multiple Man had not the slightest clue as to who Magneto was, or what he was aspiring to accomplish. You can assume all you want that Mystique may have told him (when, exactly, when both Multiple Man and Juggernaut are essentially in solitary confinement chambers...), but the movie does not establish that. Therefore, in the terms of the movie, it never happened. You can't assume what wasn't established or implied.
I've never said Mystique had any contact with Multiple Man. I've clearly stated that Multiple Man went along just for kicks. And since the movie plays him as pretty happy-go-lucky, I think that's highly likely.
Multiple Man comes off as a blind follower, with no free will of his own, just doing the bidding of anyone who comes around asking him for help. It's no wonder he's in prison.
Uh...ALL the Brotherhood come across as blind followers, except for Callisto, Arclight, and Quills, who were there to hear his original pitch. Obviously at some point Magneto said more than "I could use a man of your talents" to convince them to help. Or maybe Multiple Man only goes along because he thinks Mystique is hot.
No he hasn't. X2 showed pretty well that he does things on his own. Remember that part where he snuck away from the rest of the team, without telling them, to go pursue his own personal vendetta, instead of being a team player? Doesn't seem like development into a leader to me.
He didn't become a full fledged team-playing leader in X-MEN or X2. As I said, that's his ARC in the filmverse. An arc that was completed in X3. Yes, he left to pursue his own personal vendetta...but you're forgetting something. Remember when he realized everyone was in danger...and he LEFT Stryker, RETURNED to the X-Men, saved their asses, and LED them out to what he thought was safety? That's called leadership.
Remember his careless and wreckless attitude in the Danger Room, ruining Storm's entire purpose of the session? Doesn't seem like leadership material to me. The point is, Cyclops was needed to tell this story. They killed him off. So they put Cyclops into Wolverine.
If he's not leading, why is he in the Danger Room leading? Just because he's not being the kind of leader Storm is, or the kind that Cyclops is, does not mean he's not being a leader in that scenario. Which Danger Room scene did you watch? Because the one I saw had the X-Men essentially getting their asses handed to them...and Logan stepping up, displaying leadership skills (including teamwork) to get the job done. Again...this is a leadership characteristic. He knew offense was needed, and he went for it (Storm realizes this at the end of the movie). He may not be taking leadership seriously...but he's still doing it.
Wolverine never had that character arc until the creative team behind X-Men: The Last Stand remembered that Cyclops was vital to the story being told, and fused him with Wolverine's character because they didn't have him anymore.
Clearly Cyclops ISN'T all that vital to the story being told (as we see). What is vital is someone inspiring the X-Men into battle. It could have been Storm, but why not complete Wolverine's arc and have this man who once didn't believe in Xavier's dream inspire the younger X-Men? He's come full circle.
And it was very predictable that, in a movie where the cure was the ultimate weapon against mutants, that the cure would be used to take out the main villian.
A lot of things are predictable. It works well. What's your point?
It didn't have to be demolecularization. Quite frankly, the demolecularization was a pretty lame addition to make Jean uber evil. I didn't like that effect.
Well what would it have been? Jean ripping off Scott's clothes? Oh, hell of a threat.
Cyclops could have marched up against waves of telekinetic blasts, that threw him to the ground. But he continues to get up, and march towards Phoenix, until he finally reaches her.
Wow...Cyclops gets thrown around. What a threat to his personal safety. What a great portrayal of her evil.
Things move too fast to allow things to sink in at times.
You're a smart person. There's nothing in this movie that you should have to let sink in to understand it.
X-Men nor X2 ever moved nearly as fast as X-Men: The Last Stand does.
Simply untrue. In fact, my X-Men Pacing Project will showcase just that.
There aren't several sequences between Beast in Washington and Beast in New York.
Actually, if we go by the definition of "sequences", there are. There's a cut to Xavier's school, at which point, via the laws of movies, we can assumed it is now not "a few seconds after the government meeting", but "some time later"...and an entire ethics sequence. Then there's Xavier/Storm. Time has clearly passed. Either you lack the imagination to see how that is possible (Hint for those who lack imagination: time has passed by the time we're seeing the exterior of the mansion), or you are just stubbornly refusing to admit it works because you hate the pacing issues in some parts of X3.
X2: They are in a museum. It's surely not an interstate trip. It is established, through dialogue, that they are leaving "I think it's time for us t o go". Therefore, we know they are leaving.
X-Men: The Last Stand: We see, in daytime, Beast, attending a government meeting in Washington, D.C. The next scene, is daytime, in New York, with Xavier teaching a classroom. And after that classroom sequence, Beast, is in the mansion. It is too fast.
Not to be an ass, but you do realize that daytime lasts for more than a few hours, right? And that today, if a government official wants to travel from say, Washington to New York, it will take a few hours, tops?
So what, does the film take place in real time?
I ask again...are you incapable of rational thought (read: stupid)? Do you actually need Beast to say at the end of the meeting (which, btw, we don't see, how do we know that it ever ended?). "Well, I'm leaving for Westchester" to realize that he must have left for Westchester to arrive there?
Hell, let's rewrite the whole script because many of you lack the imagination to realize that for a character to arrive somewhere a few minutes later filmwise, some time must have passed that we do not see what transpire.
]
I'll go first.
First, we'll add a caption to the mansion shot.
EXT. X-MANSION
Caption: SIX HOURS AFTER THE GOVERNMENT MEETING
Now we'll rewrite Beast's introductory scene to avoid confusion.
INT. WHATEVER ROOM HE'S IN
Beast is looking at a painting. Storm enters, Xavier behind her.
STORM: Henry!
BEAST: Ororo, Charles. I left Washington several hours ago, traveling at normal air speed, and have now arrived here.
STORM: That was fast.
BEAST: I took a plane. In this age of modern travel, one can fly great distances in just an hour or so.
(Beast winks at the audience in case anyone is still confused how he got there so "fast")
XAVIER: I have to get back to teaching classes, and I do so for several hours a day. In fact, did you know there are several hours in a day? I figure you just came here as part of your day's work, which is why you showing up now doesn't surprise me at all.
(Xavier winks at the audience)
There.
It's daytime in Washington when Beast goes to the meeting. It's daytime in New York when Xavier is teaching the class, and Beast is in the mansion. They are in consecutive scene. Washington and New York are in completely different states.
So, because it's daytime in both scenes, a decent amount of time cannot have passed? Daytime, last I knew, lasts for something like seven, eight hours in most places. Maybe more.
And it is established they knew beforehand: "Thank you for seeing me on such short notice"
Short notice isn't just appearing in someone's study as they just happen to stroll by.
Then you should be even LESS confused. See, this is a line the writers put in there so you know Beast was expected, by Xavier at least. Obviously Beast made an appointment with Xavier SOME TIME AGO in a scene we didn't see.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO SEE EVERY SECOND OF EVERY CHARACTER'S LIFE IN A FILM!
Leaving the museum:
"Professor, I think it's time for us to leave."
"I think you're right."
Next scene, they have left, and are back in the mansion, after establishment that they were leaving the museum, that wasn't a few states away.
Washington to New York:
Beast shown, in daytime, attending government meetings in WASHINGTON D.C.
VERY NEXT SCENE, Xavier shown, in daytime, teaching a class in his mansion in Westchester, NEW YORK. Xavier strolls by his study, and Beast is there!
Then clearly
some time passed between scenes. Duh.
So, allow me to play Devil's Advocate for a moment. Am I to understand that even though many of you tend to act intelligently, that in this one instance, you are in fact stupid, and can't figure out how Beast got there, or why it's still daytime?
And it makes him a lesser character because of it.
So true. Oh, no. A cameo character hasn't been fleshed out. How will I ever sleep at night?
it wouldn't hurt if we had a scene of Angel saying he would go to Alcatraz with the X-men. He could appear during the x-jet entering sequence and enter the jet with them. Come on, the "suspense" of Angel's father falling off is 0. It's just bad storytelling.
Never thought I'd see the day when broadcasting what's about to happen in the story when it's supposed to be a surprise is "good storytelling".
Let me spell this pacing thing out one last time.
Possible X3 timeline:
-Beast has a meeting, Xavier is teaching classes
-Beast leaves meeting. Xavier takes a break from a class to take a
phone call from Beast. Beast is all like "Hey, I need to talk, it's important government stuff". Xavier's all like "Hells to the yeah".
-Xavier goes back to teaching classes, Beast hops a plane to New York.
-Xavier breaks for lunch. Goes back to teaching classes.
-Continues teaching class.
-Several hours later, as Beast takes a taxi to the mansion, Xavier is teaching more classes..
-Beast continues to travel to the mansion, as people do. He arrives sometime during the time that Xavier and Storm were talking about the weather changing. Beast is shown inside the mansion by Geoffry, the butler with three ears.
-Xavier and Storm (or maybe just Xavier) are alerted that Beast is there now.
-They talk to Beast.
Problem solved.