A 3hour Batman movie where Batman only shows up for around 30 minutes lol
A Batman movie that was mostly a Bruce Wayne movie. The more people understand this, the better. At least I hope.
To me, it's this and I've always viewed it as this:
Batman Begins is a Batman movie with telling the origins of Batman, a symbol that Bruce Wayne created.
The Dark Knight is a Gotham movie with giving the audience more insight on the peoples' feelings of this character while finally giving us a film that makes Batman as important as the villains(Joker and Two-Face). The first time that has really happened.
The Dark Knight Rises is a Bruce Wayne movie with concluding Bruce's arc while passing the mantle down. Yes, this film doesn't have much BATMAN in it, but when Batman does show up, its of him in all his glory.
worst batman movie ever. that movie was everything but not batman releated.
it's sucked big time. i just dont know how fans supported that and said it was the best
I get the same feeling when I read a post of someone saying it's the worst Batman movie; worst than Batman & Robin, Batman Forever, Batman '66...goodness, man.
You are contradicting yourself
Good and bad are just subjective and relative things.
People(especially kids) can easily say Ice Age 4 is a better movie than Monsters University and Vice versa but that not the point
Point is,you claimed being beated by an animated movie was a 'shame' for TASM but you are not twisting the argument when the same happened with MoS
Nah, not really man. I told you TAS-M got knocked off by a children's animated film that only kids enjoy. And that's true. Monsters University, at least, is an animated film that grown up men can actually like because it's actually funny.
So I watched MoS yesterday,I wasnt as disappointed as I thought I would be but the movie did have a ton of flaws
I am actually surprised so many people are blaming Goyer since I though the script wasnt that bad,the material was actually good.A little more brushing by the Nolan brothers,better dialogue and a better director and it could have been a great movie.
Agree that Goyer gets too much flack over a pretty good script. Goyer could definitely learn a thing or two for the sequel, but overall it was a good script for a good CBM, imo.
The pacing is really faulty,also the whole repeative flashback thingy is irritating.They tried to ape Batman Begins at that and failed.
Ape Batman Begins? MOS actually had flashbacks throughout most of the entire film. BB only had flashbacks during the first act, even less than that.
Henry Cavill was a terrible Clark Kent.Not because he didnt do well,on the contrary he did really well in the few scenes which needed emotion.But he wasnt written well.He almost doesnt have a single dialogue in the first 45 minutes or so.
I thought Cavill was fantastic. Really embodied all the different elements that needed to be shown with Kal/Clark. Fear, bravery, humbleness...just everything in one film. Really made me a fan of the guy.
Lois Lane started out well but it got really bad later on.She had no chemistry with the hero and how she pops up everywhere was very irritating.They also overdid the Damsel-in-distress thingy
Besides just one time she was a damsel in distress, I don't see how it was overdoing it. [BLACKOUT]She was only one when she was taken to the Black Zero with Superman and even then, she was proactive when she had help with the Jor-El AI.[/BLACKOUT]
They didnt utilize Michael Shannon well either.The script didnt do him justice and he turned out to be terrible villain.The Faora chick was more intimidating than him
Another thing that I'll have to disagree with. Cavill and Shannon are probably my favorite things about MOS. They were great as Superman and Zod. Shannon's Zod was very chilling, imo.
Also the destruction was too much,even for Superman.It was hilarious how they tried to make a big deal of him saving a falling Lois or the 6-7 people in the building in the end when Million are probably dying
It's not hilarious when Superman actually was shown to save people. [BLACKOUT]Of course people were going to die and they mostly died from the terraforming as well as the military's missiles even being forced down on the ground. Superman is hardly responsible for any of that.[/BLACKOUT]
I don't think a Batman movie should necessarily be measured by the amount of Batman on screen.
You sir, deserve a gold star
It sucks when people still have to acknowledge this when everyone should be aware of this idea.
So now that WB has left Legendary, Justice League is now impossible.
It depends. From experience, there is Green Lantern that Legendary didn't back up, but who knows...perhaps WB can get their act together without Legendary Pictures.
just like spiderman and supermen would be. you people complained how smallville sucked because 10 years didnt wear suit, and now you defend batman for not wearing his costume.

you are cracking me up
No, you have that wrong my friend. Smallville was about Clark Kent before Superman and it gets the hate because of its overdramatic elements and its tendency to focus on the love triangles of Clark/Lana/Lex or Lana/Clark/Chloe more than dealing with the mythology of Clark in helping him grow to become the eventual Superman.
Brilliant.
Talking about Batman and Superman on a Spider-Man thread...
This is the lounge.
It wasn't a worse movie than B&R but it was most definitely the worst of the Nolan films, and both Burton films are better. I would say it is the second worst, under Forever, but above B&R
Imo,
1.) The Dark Knight Rises
2.) The Dark Knight
3.) Batman Begins
4.) Batman '89
5.) Batman Returns
6.) Batman Forever
7.) Batman & Robin
8.) Batman '66