20th Century Fox Suing Over Warner Bros. Watchmen

Discussion in 'DC Comics Films' started by Rezzo, Feb 12, 2008.

  1. Rezzo The Fire Rises

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    6,574
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you guys think this will affect the production in anyway?
     
  2. Octoberist point blank

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    46,479
    Likes Received:
    12
    i'm sure they'll settle out of court...again I do have to say Fox is very sneaky about this.

    And I swear to you, I think this was prompted by the recent Lord of the Rings lawsuit..
     
  3. Octoberist point blank

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    46,479
    Likes Received:
    12
    I also find it curious that only iesb has it.
     
  4. sad lieutenant Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Messages:
    976
    Likes Received:
    0
    Either this is:
    1) Bull****, or
    2) Fox is playing hardball with a projection that has been in development for years, and really just want to settle on their terms.

    Only the 2nd requires elaboration.

    The mere fact that they waited so long to file a claim sort of undermines their case. That is, unless WB and Fox have been quietly -- and in good faith -- attempting to hash this out for the past 18 months.

    In other words, if Fox's claim were so serious, then they would have brought it before the court as soon as WB began work on pre-production.* This will be the first question any judge will have: if WB were developing Fox's property, then why didn't Fox raise these issues with the court before WB began pouring $100 million into this film?

    I doubt that there is much precedence for a court halting production on a film this far along into the process. Worse case scenario is that WB coughs up some scratch to Rupert Murdoch (and it WON'T come out of the film's budget, people!)


    * I knew when this was happening; so did you, and so did 20th Century Fox.
     
  5. Rezzo The Fire Rises

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    6,574
    Likes Received:
    0
    I updated my post with The Hollywood Reporter article.
     
  6. Octoberist point blank

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    46,479
    Likes Received:
    12
    I spoke too soon.

    I don't know if Fox can stop the production, really. I've seen any case of this nature happening with a big movie like this. They're too deep into it. If Fox gets their way because they make bad 88 minute movies, then there's a freakin' curse. Or at least, someone is pushing for a curse, and that someone is Rothman.
     
  7. sad lieutenant Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Messages:
    976
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the update, Rezzo...

    It's clear what the "unspecified damages" are, no? It's the "buyout" that Fox feels like it got screwed out of. That, and attorneys fees, and the cash-equivalent of gravy. Whether someone at WB really ****ed up, or Fox is all wet, we can't really be sure. I can't imagine how this would interrupt production, as I don't see a judge actually granting the restraining order and halting production. This thing will get resolved, and the courts will obviously have to get involved to some degree. But no judge will see that it's in anyone's best interest to halt production and put a whole lot of people out of work just because Fox wants some cash. They will get their cash. If the film is 86'ed, then Fox cannot possibly get their cash, because the film can't won't be able to make money if it can't get into theaters. It's that simple.
     
  8. Octoberist point blank

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    46,479
    Likes Received:
    12
    you're right, sad leutaenant.
     
  9. Shifty Chief of Surgery

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2000
    Messages:
    13,802
    Likes Received:
    0
    More publicity for the film.
     
  10. kaijunexus Marvel Cinematic Universe

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Doesn't Fox have enough comic book properties to mangle?
     
  11. Bruce Wayne Jr. Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    1
    Something just doesn't seem right. Especially with production this far in development.
     
  12. Spade Seeking new challengers

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    10,032
    Likes Received:
    0
    The sooner they get money in this, the faster they'll get back to raping said franchises. :o
     
  13. Rac Deadite

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    6,370
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope Fox won't get this. Rothman will just arserape it. :csad:
     
  14. Riven Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Messages:
    6,625
    Likes Received:
    1
    Is it me, or is just about everything 20th Century Fox does really really evil ?


    :twisted:
     
  15. Kirk Langstrom FRANCINE!!!!

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2000
    Messages:
    20,622
    Likes Received:
    213
    Lol, my thoughts exactly. :twisted:
     
  16. Asteroid-Man Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2005
    Messages:
    18,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    this sucks :down WB should have been more aware and Fox should've said something sooner!
     
  17. Antonello Blueberry Inglorious bastard

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2000
    Messages:
    7,947
    Likes Received:
    7
    They'll resolve the thing outside the court.
    The sum Fox was expecting shouldn't be that high.
     
  18. Superman4ever Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Messages:
    7,408
    Likes Received:
    1
    Very evil!

    I hate FOX!
     
  19. conan69 Cimmerian

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    12
    "Doesn't Fox have enough comic book properties to mangle?"

    Exactly.

    As long as Rothman is there, I WONT be seeing ANY of their comic book films.
     
  20. odiin Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,867
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why would they do that when they can make one of their chief competitors waste $150,000,000 and THEN say something?
     
  21. FlawlessVictory Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    LOL, I thought the same thing. If it wasn't enough that Fox was ruining comic book movies, they have to try to ruin one from WB that has the potential of being really good.

    F Fox. :down
     
  22. Armored Avenger A Wizard is never late...

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why is Fox doing this now, when Watchmen is so far into development. If Fox was really serious about this they would have done something when the film was announced.
    This better not damage the Watchmen film in any way - i think Watchmen is going to be great, and WB are going to do a much better job making the film than Fox would ever have.
     
  23. green fear is the mind killer

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,402
    Likes Received:
    344
    Oy this sucks.
     
  24. Figs Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    26,630
    Likes Received:
    1
    Fox has no shame and their level of greed is unmatched in this industry.

    This is such bull****...waiting this long and out of nowhere to just try and sue.
     
  25. Octoberist point blank

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    46,479
    Likes Received:
    12
    the lawsuit makes no sense because Fox waited until now to do it. Not only that, remember Paramount was in pre-production with Watchmen almost 3 years ago, and Fox didn't anything about it either.

    Infact, for the past decade, Watchmen has been bouncing back and forth non-stop, from studio to studio. So why didn't Fox do anything about it back then?
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"