grey_jeanie
Sidekick
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2005
- Messages
- 3,010
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
And me
It's not working for me. Is there something else?
marvelman418 said:I know this is kind of off topic, but who is the SHH mascot guy on the first post? That is not hyper? Looks like SHH has a new mascot or Hyper has a new teammate?
are ILM the ones who did the new Star Wars?Yes, WETA is only second to ILM when it comes to digital fx.
8. Fantastic Marketing
![]()
Although fanboys may despise this studio for whatever, I seriously doubt any of them will deny that 20th Century Fox does a helluva job with promoting their films. Already, they have taken the marketing to a new level with the brilliant Silver Surfer standees (pictured above). As evidenced with the way theyve marketed their other comic book films i.e. Daredevil, X2, and X-Men: The Last Stand, we definitely dont have to worry about the studio getting a number 4 plastered on every media outlet by time June 15th arrives. I dont think there was one nook or cranny Fox left untouched when marketing the first Fantastic Four film--which went on to become a $330 million blockbuster. So if they can do that for an origin film imagine how much more will they step it up for this sequel! Within a matter of days now we will be witnessing a marketing blitz unlike anything weve ever seen. And how awesome is it that they've managed to keep the lid on all the major details (instead of ****ing out every possible clip like certain other overhyped franchises of late)!
are ILM the ones who did the new Star Wars?
if so then WETA>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ILM
ILM did POTC2 which them an Oscar.With Davy Jones and his crew as the highlight.Mindblowing work...
![]()
![]()
Good points.I'm pretty much amazed it took someone this long to realize it would be a better idea to film motion capture on location rather than inside a separate studio. I mean it's basically a combination of green screen AND CGI when they film it separately and blue screen almost always looks fake, and CGI almost always looks fake, so when you combine them together that's twice the fakeness, but when you actually film it together with the live action parts, not only do both the stars and mocap people actually have something to interact with which, it also removes the "pasted on" feel that you get from most CG characters and they actually look and feel like they're part of the real world in the movie.
I'm pretty much amazed it took someone this long to realize it would be a better idea to film motion capture on location rather than inside a separate studio. I mean it's basically a combination of green screen AND CGI when they film it separately and blue screen almost always looks fake, and CGI almost always looks fake, so when you combine them together that's twice the fakeness, but when you actually film it together with the live action parts, not only do both the stars and mocap people actually have something to interact with which, it also removes the "pasted on" feel that you get from most CG characters and they actually look and feel like they're part of the real world in the movie.
I think another thing going for this movie is something that we've seen over the past few days and that is the relationship between the actors.....I believe that will come across in the movie as well.