Hey.
Make yer own thread--don't hijack mine.
Ah man come on. Hijacking is not my style. I just think we all need to wake up. Having hope was good and it lasted long, but we can't ignore the obvious. Still love ya man!
Hey.
Make yer own thread--don't hijack mine.
Ah man come on. Hijacking is not my style. I just think we all need to wake up. Having hope was good and it lasted long, but we can't ignore the obvious. Still love ya man!
Wow. I still think that this movie is going to be good and until I see it and am proved otherwise my hopes are very high. Regarding some of these points though:Well this topic was good while it lasted, but I think it's time to counter the negatives.
1. 95 min run time= we all know this doesn't bode well
2. No Watcher
3. Moving the release date due to Transformers.
4. Doom, SS, Maybe Galatus, and the F4 all being cramed into a 95 min film
5. Galctus the cloud: Who are we all kidding, their is no hope. Galactus has been raped
6. Ga lak tus
7. The board is now the source of Radd's power
8.Tim Story is directing again
9.The same creative team is on board
10.The screening in Seattle: again lets not kid each other. There was a screening and it was indeed negative as AICN reported. Don't care what lies Fox pr tried to spin.
11. AICN: say what you want and yeah they are bais and have proved to be wrong more often then right in the past about films, but with FOX and their comic properties thet have been d@mn near spot on.
12. No interaction between The Surfer and Alicia.
13. Not sticking to the source material
14. Alba looking like a character from white Chicks
15. No respect for Doom
16. FOX
Why go on. This is pointless. Once again we have been crushed.
Well this topic was good while it lasted, but I think it's time to counter the negatives.
1. 95 min run time= we all know this doesn't bode well
2. No Watcher
3. Moving the release date due to Transformers.
4. Doom, SS, Maybe Galatus, and the F4 all being cramed into a 95 min film
5. Galctus the cloud: Who are we all kidding, their is no hope. Galactus has been raped
6. Ga lak tus
7. The board is now the source of Radd's power
8.Tim Story is directing again
9.The same creative team is on board
10.The screening in Seattle: again lets not kid each other. There was a screening and it was indeed negative as AICN reported. Don't care what lies Fox pr tried to spin.
11. AICN: say what you want and yeah they are bais and have proved to be wrong more often then right in the past about films, but with FOX and their comic properties thet have been d@mn near spot on.
12. No interaction between The Surfer and Alicia.
13. Not sticking to the source material
14. Alba looking like a character from white Chicks
15. No respect for Doom
16. FOX
Why go on. This is pointless. Once again we have been crushed.
One Thing This Movie Has Going For It Is The Quality Of It's Fans!
and It seems Nokio is making to many assumptions with things we don't know yet, like # 15.![]()
In Regards to Nokio's negative list:
1 and 4, 5 and 6, 12 and 13, Might as well all be the same.
and It seems Nokio is making to many assumptions with things we don't know yet, like # 15.![]()
Yes. We haven't seen that much, and we haven't seen it in motion.Mercurius said:So take a look in Doom's picture from some leaked footage in the other thread. Any doubts?
So take a look in Doom's picture from some leaked footage in the other thread. Any doubts?![]()
Yes. We haven't seen that much, and we haven't seen it in motion.
At the very least, I think Doom certainly looks better than in FF1.
The main negative for me at this point is the godawful Fishburn voice in the new tv spot.![]()
I think he looks very regal myself.....I'm waiting to a better quality and looking to see him in action.....but he sounds like a villain worthy of fighting the F4 in the novel, and looks the part from what I've seen...
That's your opinion, I'm ok with it, but for me that "armor" has LAME written in golden capitals all over it.
It's just classical campy stuff.![]()
And that is your opinion.![]()
I'm so tempted to list this....
![]()
...in my article. Does anyone agree that it's solid enough to bank on as a positive? I mean, if this is not confirmation of Galactus not being a mere cloud, I don't know what is...