Yurka
Let The Games Begin!
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
- Messages
- 19,889
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 58
Actually, according to Empire Article, Nolan states this:
Just because the film introduces us to the character doesn't necessarily make it the same as the backstory of the character. Let's not forget that Nolan has a tendency to play around with time in his films, not to mention how much more of an effective introduction to Bane would it be if. Let's also not forget that the description about the prologue that was leaked came out before it was confirmed that The Dark Knight Rises would be taking place eight years later, and certainly, based on the supposed details of that prologue, it definitely puts it in a much better light and context now. Granted, it's possible that the supposed leak of the prologue is fake and that there's been hints about Bane's backstory being in the film, but it's also entirely possible that the supposed description of the prologue could happen first and then we get Bane's backstory.we already see him as Bane and defeating Batman like the supposed description of the prologue states?
No, Nolan didn't say that the prologue shows Bane's backstory, but it serves as an introduction to Bane. Bane can be introduced before flashing back to his origins.
Semantics. I meant we'll get some info about Bane and his character.