• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

61 Nights of Halloween (2025 Edition)

Best of the week
The Babadook (2014) dir. Jennifer Kent
a30c6674dfb1e63d298a61a5497bcec15bc6e38f.gif


Killer Klowns from Outer Space (1988) dir. Stephen Chiodo
b0eca1098dc407b3b01ba0924c5962659c4852cb.gif


Little Shop of Horrors (1986) dir. Frank Oz
2ed1b8637a25132d1dbf5fbebbd442dc7178ca2d.gif


Oddity (2024) dir. Damian McCarthy
d65ee006d6e8de8c12ae1b93cbaf288cae059df5.gif


Phantom of the Paradise (1974) dir. Brian De Palma
6dbeebeaf924774ea0950eefd7301a41f55494e7.gif


Psycho Goreman (2020) dir. Steven Kostanski
3202ad612f768d92acdc63a1fab20abaa4be2590.gif

b4a26326d5791a8a166b8698125ba286bb5d2cd9.gif
47c542e05a7763742e9f1e38dc79336a5494eb8d.gif

@Kane52630 might find those gifs... familiar...

Se7en (1995) dir. David Fincher
395651e6c2cbf5d82ed2dbde75973ca38bf3548a.gif


Spree (2020) Dir. Eugene Kotlyarenko
948134417b4b6e68b79abf005070206a164ff4eb.gif
 
September 29th:
Halloween (2007)
Halloween II (2009)

halloween-xlg-1.jpg


Director's cut.

My biggest takeaway from this (and its sequel) is that Rob Zombie never really wanted to make a Halloween movie in the first place. The first half plays like hillbilly horror laced with trauma porn that could've been the origin story for any random serial killer. It has very little to do with Halloween, aesthetically or otherwise. Still, at least I was entertained by the freshness of that portion of the film. Malcolm McDowell is an excellent Loomis, and he's easily my favorite thing about the duology.

The second half, though, is a half-hearted remake of the original Halloween with an extended, unbelievably boring finale that refuses to end. Michael's long-winded origin story ultimately adds nothing of value to the third act, and all that I'm really left with is frustration.

2007's Halloween is also a shockingly misogynistic film — absurdly so. The endless queerphobic dialogue doesn't help either. Rob Zombie's writing is juvenile, try-hard edgy, and ultimately, vapid. And the explicit rape scene alone makes me question him entirely.

So, what does this add to the Halloween canon? A Michael Myers that looks like an Uruk-hai, and the bare breasts of every young, skinny female cast member that isn't Laurie Strode. Yippee.

h-two-ver4-xlg.jpg


Director's cut.

Halloween II, or Lynch for Dummies, is an improvement on its predecessor — but it's still a Rob Zombie film. The misogyny is surprisingly toned down (at least in the first half), the characters feel more lived-in, and there's actual psychological and thematic exploration going on. Unfortunately, Zombie is still a dreadful writer, and his dialogue in particular is like nails on a chalkboard.

The film's most constant motif is Zombie introducing an interesting idea, then explaining it over and over again with the subtlety of Michael hacking someone's head off. It's so, so clunky — but admittedly, I do appreciate the attempt to reach for something more substantial.

Amidst all the improvements, the cinematography takes a huge hit from part one. Halloween II looks outright hideous. And to be honest, this isn’t really a Halloween film. Whatever it is, I might actually revisit it some day — unlike its predecessor.

Rob Zombie remains a better director than he is a writer, and I am curious to delve further into his filmography... one day. For now, I need a goddamn break.
 
Last edited:
September 29th:
Halloween (2007)
Halloween II (2009)

halloween-xlg-1.jpg


Director's cut.

My biggest takeaway from this (and its sequel) is that Rob Zombie never really wanted to make a Halloween movie in the first place. The first half plays like hillbilly horror laced with trauma porn that could've been the origin story for any random serial killer. It has very little to do with Halloween, aesthetically or otherwise. Still, at least I was entertained by the freshness of that portion of the film. Malcolm McDowell is an excellent Loomis, and he's easily my favorite thing about the duology.

The second half, though, is a half-hearted remake of the original Halloween with an extended, unbelievably boring finale that refuses to end. Michael's long-winded origin story ultimately adds nothing of value to the third act, and all that I'm really left with is frustration.

2007's Halloween is also a shockingly misogynistic film — absurdly so. The endless queerphobic dialogue doesn't help either. Rob Zombie's writing is juvenile, try-hard edgy, and ultimately, vapid. And the explicit rape scene alone makes me question him entirely.

So, what does this add to the Halloween canon? A Michael Myers that looks like an Uruk-hai, and the bare breasts of every young, skinny female cast member that isn't Laurie Strode. Yippee.

h-two-ver4-xlg.jpg


Director's cut.

Halloween II, or Lynch for Dummies, is an improvement on its predecessor — but it's still a Rob Zombie film. The misogyny is surprisingly toned down (at least in the first half), the characters feel more lived-in, and there's actual psychological and thematic exploration going on. Unfortunately, Zombie is still a dreadful writer, and his dialogue in particular is like nails on a chalkboard.

The film's most constant motif is Zombie introducing an interesting idea, then explaining it over and over again with the subtlety of Michael hacking someone's head off. It's so, so clunky — but admittedly, I do appreciate the attempt to reach for something more substantial.

Amidst all the improvements, the cinematography takes a huge hit from part one. Halloween II looks outright hideous. And to be honest, this isn’t really a Halloween film. Whatever it is, I might actually revisit it some day — unlike its predecessor.

Rob Zombie remains a better director than he is a writer, and I am curious to delve further into his filmography... one day. For now, I need a goddamn break.
Hmm...

G15dgt9W4AAxlCs.jpg

:o
 
Last edited:
Night 29

67. Van Helsing (2004) dir. Stephen Sommers

e3786fbfc6dbad50b2eafab3005d08c6a3339c08.gifv

Bite-Sized Review: I've always wanted to love this one but my brain won't allow it. But there will always be the Kate of it all.

**1/2

68. After Midnight (2020) dir. Jeremy Gardner & Christian Stella (NEW)
something-else.jpg

Bite-Sized Review: One of those blends of two different genres. It works but also feels like one where the horror isn't worth sinking your teeth into.

***1/4

69 (NICE). Together (2025) dir. Michael Shanks (NEW)
d6f455834bca9918b069a50ea672e061bfefeb42.gifv

Bite-Sized Review: This one is a weird one. Not because of the material. That's mostly up to scratch and fun. It's the real life married couple that's the issue. Franco's just isn't a good enough actor for what is asked of him here with a general lack of chemistry. Also am I to believe someone doesn't want to shag Alison Brie? Be serious.

***1/2
 
Night 29

67. Van Helsing (2004) dir. Stephen Sommers

e3786fbfc6dbad50b2eafab3005d08c6a3339c08.gifv

Bite-Sized Review: I've always wanted to love this one but my brain won't allow it. But there will always be the Kate of it all.

**1/2

68. After Midnight (2020) dir. Jeremy Gardner & Christian Stella (NEW)
something-else.jpg

Bite-Sized Review: One of those blends of two different genres. It works but also feels like one where the horror isn't worth sinking your teeth into.

***1/4

69 (NICE). Together (2025) dir. Michael Shanks (NEW)
d6f455834bca9918b069a50ea672e061bfefeb42.gifv

Bite-Sized Review: This one is a weird one. Not because of the material. That's mostly up to scratch and fun. It's the real life married couple that's the issue. Franco's just isn't a good enough actor for what is asked of him here with a general lack of chemistry. Also am I to believe someone doesn't want to shag Alison Brie? Be serious.

***1/2
1759292878762.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"