9/11- An insurance scam?

Alonsovich said:
Name me the quantity of filmmakers that have criticised Islamic radicalism after Van Gogh's murder. They're in terror as much as the international community was after 9/11. Hence the name terrorism.

:rolleyes:

look over your statement, closely, then read your article, then, perhaps a dictionary or two. seriously man. you wanted to make a point and you failed,

just

let

it

go

......
 
Your sig clearly depicts your attitude about life well.
 
Alonsovich said:
Give me a list of the different kinds of muslim extremism that exist, so we can see how intelligent you are to not consider them the same... point us out the major differences they all have...


LOL, you rock seriously man :up:
 
Mr Sparkle said:
LOL, you rock seriously man :up:

Tell me which part of "Takfirs are radical islamists" did you not understand...
 
Sofa said:
Your sig clearly depicts your attitude about life well.

I'm disrespectful to dirt? :confused:

you're biased towards clouds, as evidenced by your avatar......WTF?
did I take some left turn at logic land somewhere and I'm in a bizarro world????
 
Mr Sparkle said:
I'm disrespectful to dirt? :confused:

you're biased towards clouds, as evidenced by your avatar......WTF?
did I take some left turn at logic land somewhere and I'm in a bizarro world????
Forget it dude. :rolleyes:
 
Alonsovich said:
Tell me which part of "Takfirs are radical islamists" did you not understand...

tell me which part of "the attack was directed at Theo Van Gogh" did YOU not understand? :up:
 
Mr Sparkle said:
seriously though....who are you?
i dunno, who cares?

i sure dont care who you are.
 
Mr Sparkle said:
I'm crushed...seriously, who are you?
Im a person? I dont get the point of your question. Who do you think i am?
 
Mr Sparkle said:
tell me which part of "the attack was directed at Theo Van Gogh" did YOU not understand? :up:

Did you seriously look at what Van Gogh stood for? Silencing a public and respected by media voice against anything by a radical group is still considered terrorism everywhere in this world. You should tell us why did an islamic terrorist cell ready to attack in the Netherlands got disabled with the data the killer provided... but I guess that groups like IRA and ETA, that have been doing this for AGES, are not terrorists for you, although these two groups have proved that terrorism is not only bombs, but all the ideology that it creates around it. THAT'S the danger, not the planes themselves.
 
Alonsovich said:
Did you seriously look at what Van Gogh stood for? Silencing a public and respected by media voice against anything by a radical group is still considered terrorism everywhere in this world. You should tell us why did an islamic terrorist cell ready to attack in the Netherlands got disabled with the data the killer provided... but I guess that groups like IRA and ETA, that have been doing this for AGES, are not terrorists for you, although these two groups have proved that terrorism is not only bombs, but all the ideology that it creates around it. THAT'S the danger, not the planes themselves.

apparently in your mind he stood for the netherlands.
I hope he walked around with one of those Miss Universe dealies where they write their countrie's names.
 
Mr Sparkle said:
apparently in your mind he stood for the netherlands.
I hope he walked around with one of those Miss Universe dealies where they write their countrie's names.

I didn't say that, he stood for freedom of speech against radical islamism. His murder is an attack against that, and since freedom of speech is one of the basis of the Dutch society, an attack against the Netehrlands as a collective. This is exactly what the IRA and ETA did.
 
Alonsovich said:
I didn't say that, he stood for freedom of speech against radical islamism. His murder is an attack against that, and since freedom of speech is one of the basis of the Dutch society, an attack against the Netehrlands as a collective. This is exactly what the IRA and ETA did.

this is getting eerie. wasn't the ETA one of the things we talked about with Miser, Sparkle?
 
maxwell's demon said:
this is getting eerie. wasn't the ETA one of the things we talked about with Miser, Sparkle?

I don't know what were you guys speaking about the ETA, but I can assure you I know their modus operandi very well. I'm a spaniard myself and see those guys on the news almost every friggin' day (more than Bush, LOL...) and my uncle is a retired policeman who has served in the Basque region for 15 years.
 
Ive heard he`s bankrupt,so he`s stalling so New York City will pay for the entire rebulding themselfs.
 
hippie_hunter said:
You know, for some reason I always imagined TSOG to be just like Dib from Invader Zim, a paranormal researcher that beleives in crazy things but those crazy things turn out to be right but no one beleives him and they just call him crazy :(

Sad but true. :( ;) :up:
 
Alonsovich said:
I still think it was Jaques de Molay (who faked his death in the bonfire in the 14th century) who organized 9/11 so that he could reform the Templarian Order to declare the Tenth Crusade...

Wow. I can honestly say I never expected to see that name mentioned again, let alone in a thread calling the 9/11 tragedy a scam.
 
ElectroFlare said:
Wow. I can honestly say I never expected to see that name mentioned again, let alone in a thread calling the 9/11 tragedy a scam.

Oh, PLEASE! Stop calling what happened on 9/11 a "tragedy" over and over again, as if it's a sacrilege to talk about conspiracy theories surrounding that infamous day.

Yes, it was a "tragedy" for the people who died and those who knew them, their friends and families and so forth, but the world desperately NEEDS to get over itself, to get over it's initial trauma and start looking at the facts objectively.

9/11 WAS a scam, because people knew about it ahead of time and did nothing because it suited their personal interests, while others made it happen secretly and blamed others afterwards, the usual bunch of scary foreigners from overseas, and they ALL profited vastly from these terrible events.

And need I remind you that the "official" version of the story is a conspiracy theory as well, but since it's the government's version people in general simply say "Well, it must be the truth, our dear elected leaders wouldn't LIE to us, would they? They wouldn't exploit us like this, would they?", while independent investigators are riduculed by the voluntarily ignorant masses merely out of blind faith.

God bless America, I suppose. :rolleyes:
 
TheSumOfGod said:
Oh, PLEASE! Stop calling what happened on 9/11 a "tragedy" over and over again, as if it's a sacrilege to talk about conspiracy theories surrounding that infamous day.

Yes, it was a "tragedy" for the people who died and those who knew them, their friends and families and so forth, but the world desperately NEEDS to get over itself, to get over it's initial trauma and start looking at the facts objectively.

9/11 WAS a scam, because people knew about it ahead of time and did nothing because it suited their personal interests, while others made it happen secretly and blamed others afterwards, the usual bunch of scary foreigners from overseas, and they ALL profited vastly from these terrible events.

And need I remind you that the "official" version of the story is a conspiracy theory as well, but since it's the government's version people in general simply say "Well, it must be the truth, our dear elected leaders wouldn't LIE to us, would they? They wouldn't exploit us like this, would they?", while independent investigators are riduculed by the voluntarily ignorant masses merely out of blind faith.

God bless America, I suppose. :rolleyes:

Your theory seems to be based more on "truthiness" rather than truth.
 
The Overlord said:
Your theory seems to be based more on "truthiness" rather than truth.

There is no truth in this Universe, only different points of view. Even if you could go back in time and see it happen again from the inside, two different persons would still interpret the events differently regardless that they saw the exact same thing.

And no matter how much "evidence" and "eyewitnesses" and "experts" one side can gather, the other side can come up with an equal or greater amount of "evidence" or "eyewitnesses" or "experts".

So you have to ask yourself one question: Who do you trust? The American government, who lies as it breathes, or the independent investigators, who are trying to find out what really happened?

Or let me put it to you this way: Do you believe that such a series of "coincidences" is possible? Or are there truly no "coincidences" here?
 
TheSumOfGod said:
There is no truth in this Universe, only different points of view. Even if you could go back in time and see it happen again from the inside, two different persons would still interpret the events differently regardless that they saw the exact same thing.

And no matter how much "evidence" and "eyewitnesses" and "experts" one side can gather, the other side can come up with an equal or greater amount of "evidence" or "eyewitnesses" or "experts".

So you have to ask yourself one question: Who do you trust? The American government, who lies as it breathes, or the independent investigators, who are trying to find out what really happened?

Or let me put it to you this way: Do you believe that such a series of "coincidences" is possible? Or are there truly no "coincidences" here?

I believe in Occam razor, Islamic terrorists crashing planes into the towers is far more logical then holographic missles. You give the US government way to much credit, the US government is not clever enough to pull this off and not be found out. Look at their track record, their numerous failed assassination attempts on Castro, their inabilty to keep Watergate or even Clinton's sexual anticts under wraps and their total bungling of the Iraq war. The US government simplely is not as fearsome or impressive as you make them out to be.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"