• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

A Shakespearean View: Batman and Joker, and what TDK will be.

Castlewood

Civilian
Joined
Dec 28, 2004
Messages
795
Reaction score
0
Points
11
Can we look at the characters of Batman and Joker and trace them back to the plays of Shakespeare? If so, how? And does their rivalry model after something by Shakespeare as well?

hamlet1.jpg


Well, here’s how I’ll start. I’m a Shakespeare buff, particularly of Hamlet. When I look at Hamlet, I have to wonder if the character inspired Bob Kane or Bill Finger to make Batman the character he is today, or if he accidentally “evolved” into this over the years by other writers. I also have to wonder if Joker’s character is modeled after the comedic court jesters that bring light to the tragedies, such as Macbeth, Richard III, and Hamlet, and if the lack of an origin for Joker is based on the fact that we don’t know anything about the jesters either. They are simply “there”. But if one were to look at “The Killing Joke” and see the suggestion of an origin, you also have to wonder if the tragic loss of his pregnant wife and his descent into madness is also modeled after a Shakespearean tragedy, if the origin is “true” and not just “multiple choice.”

Am I reaching? We shall see.

Let’s start with Batman, and his obvious parallel to Hamlet.

hamlet.gif


Hamlet, the character, is lost. His father was the king of Denmark, and he was murdered by his brother (Hamlet’s uncle, Claudius), in order to become king. As a result of this, Hamlet now is a tortured soul, not knowing any direction in life. He doesn’t care about living or dying, and he shows no love for anyone. He wears all black, and he constantly mourns about the “rotten state of Denmark”. Denmark is now full of corruption, full of drunks, prostitutes, and a new king (Claudius) who was nothing like the original king – Hamlet’s father.
Finally, after losing hope in life, Hamlet discovers THE GHOST of his father. The Ghost tells Hamlet to avenge his death by killing the current king and getting rid of the corruption that has spread throughout Denmark. Thus, Hamlet vows to put on a “mask” and pretends to be crazy, when in fact he knows exactly what is happening. Nobody knows who the REAL Hamlet is underneath, except for his dear friend, Horatio.
Hamlet then leaves Denmark and goes on a journey for an extended period of time – scholars suggest that he’s gone for ten years. Nobody knows where he goes, and as an audience, we have no idea where he goes either. He’s just gone to a mysterious place, and that question is never answered. Then, when he returns to Denmark after that extended period of time, he now seems more mature, and has this sense about him that he has grown wiser, and instead of being truly lost, he now has a better understanding of what he has to do – seek vengeance for his father’s death, and end the corruption in Denmark.

Does this sound familiar?

Now, let’s look at Bruce Wayne.


Batman-color.jpg


Bruce, the character, is lost. His father (Thomas Wayne) was the “king” of Gotham City, and he was murdered by Joe Chill, a hobo who basically lived on the streets, and killed Thomas and Martha in search of MONEY. If you have money, you have POWER.
Now, you’re probably wondering why this is a parallel to Hamlet’s Father, and Claudius, his father’s brother, since Thomas Wayne and Joe Chill were NOT brothers. However, if you look at the two characters in a biblical sense, and look at humanity from an Adam and Eve perspective, and how all men are created equal and how we are all brothers and sisters, then you can interpret that Thomas Wayne and Joe Chill are “brothers”.

Joe Chill kills Thomas (and Martha) in order to gain money, or POWER. Basically, he wants to live like a “king”, and be just as rich as Thomas, much like Claudius kills Hamlet’s father in order to be king… because he’s extremely GREEDY for money and power.

Bruce, as a result of this, has become truly lost. He has no direction in life. He has inherited his father’s billions. He has everything a man could want: fancy cars, sexy models, billions of dollars…. But that’s not enough. He is so CONSUMED by his parents’death, that it takes over his life, and he has no idea what to do.

Gotham City is exactly like Denmark. After Thomas Wayne’s death, Gotham City has now become a city of corruption, full of dirty cops, drugs, and prostitutes. Their loving “king” is no longer there, so the city is completely lost, much like Bruce.

Then, much like Hamlet seeing the Ghost (or angel, if you want to look at it that way), Bruce sees THE BAT. The Bat is like his calling, his guardian angel, it’s telling him what he has to do, what he has to BECOME. He has to become a Bat, and it’s like the Bat is telling him to seek vengeance and avenge his parents’ death by cleaning up the streets of Gotham and putting an end to the corruption. He also has to find Joe Chill (but tragically, in the original comics, Bruce is doomed never to find Chill, which is why his “mission” will never end).

Bruce, like Hamlet, then has to put on a “mask” and become “someone else.” That someone else is BATMAN, and nobody really knows that Batman IS Bruce Wayne except for his loving butler, Alfred. Alfred is exactly like Hamlet’s best friend, Horatio, because only Horatio truly knows who Hamlet really is underneath his “mask”.

Of course, before all of this happens… where does Bruce go? WE DON’T KNOW. Bruce Wayne leaves Gotham City for an extended period of time, just like Hamlet leaves Denmark, and we never know where the hell he goes. “Batman Begins” fills that gap for us, but based on original comics, we never know where Bruce is for that time.
Then, after those many years, Bruce comes back to Gotham, and has a better understanding of who he is, and what he has to do, just like what I said about Hamlet above.

So, you see, it’s all the same.

Batman = Hamlet
Alfred = Horatio
Thomas Wayne = Hamlet’s Father (the King)
Joe Chill = (Claudius, Hamlet’s brother)
The Bat = The Ghost
Gotham City = Denmark

If you want to know the ending of “The Batman Story”, and what happens to Batman in the end, then all you have to do is look at the fate of Hamlet, and there’s your answer. Batman will eventually die because of his obsession. It has taken over him, and he will never find resolution to his inner conflict. He’ll just die… his mission will never end, he’ll just keep fighting until he’s dead. There is no happy ending for Batman. Batman is a TRAGIC, Shakespearean character, doomed to die without any sense of happiness.


Now that that’s out of the way, we have to look at The Joker, Batman’s #1 villain, and arguably the greatest villain of our time, and obviously the greatest villain in comic book history.

schleich_court_jester.jpg



THE DARK KNIGHT : What will this movie be?

Why is it that the Joker, a man we know little to nothing about, is hailed with so much praise and is called “the greatest”? Well, we have to look in terms of Shakespeare’s characters, and how Joker relates to Batman. Joker is Batman’s opposite. He stands for everything Batman stands against, and vice versa.
But, who is Joker? He has no origin (based on original comics, aside from the chemical and “Killing Joke” stories). He, like Shakespeare’s court jesters, is a comedic “clown” who is there to add some light to an otherwise dark play. If Batman is a very dark character like Hamlet, then Joker is obviously the clown who is thrown into the mix as a balance. This is why Joker is Batman’s opposite.
Of course, Joker is a psychotic killer who looks grotesque and like a clown, but you have to admit, every time you see Joker, you can’t help but smile and laugh at how silly the man is, much like the court jester who brings humor to a dark and moody play. If “Batman Begins” was our “Hamlet”, or origin story for Batman, then “The Dark Knight” would have to be about the “clown” who brings humor to a dark and tragic character – Batman. “Batman Begins” didn’t have a lot of humor to it… it was very moody and emotional, and at times, tragic. If Joker is Batman’s complete opposite, then there is no question in my mind that The Joker will be that classic Shakespearean jester who adds some silliness to Denmark.

- TempleFugit



WB1150%20Classic%20Joker.jpg
 
basically, expect a big budget SE7EN type blockbuster.
 
Interesting analysis. You're stretching in parts, mostly trying too hard to link Chill and Claudius. I think it's enough to equate the murder itself to Claudius, not the murderer. But you're right, Batman is very much a modern Hamlet.
 
Interesting indeed. I wouldn't go that far, but I see how you can make the case for.
 
A very well thought out analysis. The parallels you've pointed out between Thomas Wayne/Gotham and The King/Denmark are very interesting. And of course, there's certainly always been those underlying qualities of the Joker that evoked thoughts of Shakespearian jesters.

As an actor and admirer of the theatre, I salute you. A++++!
 
i love how the same story can be told a million different ways
 
I believe Lew Moxon is a better parallel to Claudius than Joe Chill.
 
Can we look at the characters of Batman and Joker and trace them back to the plays of Shakespeare? If so, how? And does their rivalry model after something by Shakespeare as well?

hamlet1.jpg


Well, here’s how I’ll start. I’m a Shakespeare buff, particularly of Hamlet. When I look at Hamlet, I have to wonder if the character inspired Bob Kane or Bill Finger to make Batman the character he is today, or if he accidentally “evolved” into this over the years by other writers. I also have to wonder if Joker’s character is modeled after the comedic court jesters that bring light to the tragedies, such as Macbeth, Richard III, and Hamlet, and if the lack of an origin for Joker is based on the fact that we don’t know anything about the jesters either. They are simply “there”. But if one were to look at “The Killing Joke” and see the suggestion of an origin, you also have to wonder if the tragic loss of his pregnant wife and his descent into madness is also modeled after a Shakespearean tragedy, if the origin is “true” and not just “multiple choice.”

Am I reaching? We shall see.

Let’s start with Batman, and his obvious parallel to Hamlet.

hamlet.gif


Hamlet, the character, is lost. His father was the king of Denmark, and he was murdered by his brother (Hamlet’s uncle, Claudius), in order to become king. As a result of this, Hamlet now is a tortured soul, not knowing any direction in life. He doesn’t care about living or dying, and he shows no love for anyone. He wears all black, and he constantly mourns about the “rotten state of Denmark”. Denmark is now full of corruption, full of drunks, prostitutes, and a new king (Claudius) who was nothing like the original king – Hamlet’s father.
Finally, after losing hope in life, Hamlet discovers THE GHOST of his father. The Ghost tells Hamlet to avenge his death by killing the current king and getting rid of the corruption that has spread throughout Denmark. Thus, Hamlet vows to put on a “mask” and pretends to be crazy, when in fact he knows exactly what is happening. Nobody knows who the REAL Hamlet is underneath, except for his dear friend, Horatio.
Hamlet then leaves Denmark and goes on a journey for an extended period of time – scholars suggest that he’s gone for ten years. Nobody knows where he goes, and as an audience, we have no idea where he goes either. He’s just gone to a mysterious place, and that question is never answered. Then, when he returns to Denmark after that extended period of time, he now seems more mature, and has this sense about him that he has grown wiser, and instead of being truly lost, he now has a better understanding of what he has to do – seek vengeance for his father’s death, and end the corruption in Denmark.

Does this sound familiar?

Now, let’s look at Bruce Wayne.


Batman-color.jpg


Bruce, the character, is lost. His father (Thomas Wayne) was the “king” of Gotham City, and he was murdered by Joe Chill, a hobo who basically lived on the streets, and killed Thomas and Martha in search of MONEY. If you have money, you have POWER.
Now, you’re probably wondering why this is a parallel to Hamlet’s Father, and Claudius, his father’s brother, since Thomas Wayne and Joe Chill were NOT brothers. However, if you look at the two characters in a biblical sense, and look at humanity from an Adam and Eve perspective, and how all men are created equal and how we are all brothers and sisters, then you can interpret that Thomas Wayne and Joe Chill are “brothers”.

Joe Chill kills Thomas (and Martha) in order to gain money, or POWER. Basically, he wants to live like a “king”, and be just as rich as Thomas, much like Claudius kills Hamlet’s father in order to be king… because he’s extremely GREEDY for money and power.

Bruce, as a result of this, has become truly lost. He has no direction in life. He has inherited his father’s billions. He has everything a man could want: fancy cars, sexy models, billions of dollars…. But that’s not enough. He is so CONSUMED by his parents’death, that it takes over his life, and he has no idea what to do.

Gotham City is exactly like Denmark. After Thomas Wayne’s death, Gotham City has now become a city of corruption, full of dirty cops, drugs, and prostitutes. Their loving “king” is no longer there, so the city is completely lost, much like Bruce.

Then, much like Hamlet seeing the Ghost (or angel, if you want to look at it that way), Bruce sees THE BAT. The Bat is like his calling, his guardian angel, it’s telling him what he has to do, what he has to BECOME. He has to become a Bat, and it’s like the Bat is telling him to seek vengeance and avenge his parents’ death by cleaning up the streets of Gotham and putting an end to the corruption. He also has to find Joe Chill (but tragically, in the original comics, Bruce is doomed never to find Chill, which is why his “mission” will never end).

Bruce, like Hamlet, then has to put on a “mask” and become “someone else.” That someone else is BATMAN, and nobody really knows that Batman IS Bruce Wayne except for his loving butler, Alfred. Alfred is exactly like Hamlet’s best friend, Horatio, because only Horatio truly knows who Hamlet really is underneath his “mask”.

Of course, before all of this happens… where does Bruce go? WE DON’T KNOW. Bruce Wayne leaves Gotham City for an extended period of time, just like Hamlet leaves Denmark, and we never know where the hell he goes. “Batman Begins” fills that gap for us, but based on original comics, we never know where Bruce is for that time.
Then, after those many years, Bruce comes back to Gotham, and has a better understanding of who he is, and what he has to do, just like what I said about Hamlet above.

So, you see, it’s all the same.

Batman = Hamlet
Alfred = Horatio
Thomas Wayne = Hamlet’s Father (the King)
Joe Chill = (Claudius, Hamlet’s brother)
The Bat = The Ghost
Gotham City = Denmark

If you want to know the ending of “The Batman Story”, and what happens to Batman in the end, then all you have to do is look at the fate of Hamlet, and there’s your answer. Batman will eventually die because of his obsession. It has taken over him, and he will never find resolution to his inner conflict. He’ll just die… his mission will never end, he’ll just keep fighting until he’s dead. There is no happy ending for Batman. Batman is a TRAGIC, Shakespearean character, doomed to die without any sense of happiness.


Now that that’s out of the way, we have to look at The Joker, Batman’s #1 villain, and arguably the greatest villain of our time, and obviously the greatest villain in comic book history.

schleich_court_jester.jpg



THE DARK KNIGHT : What will this movie be?

Why is it that the Joker, a man we know little to nothing about, is hailed with so much praise and is called “the greatest”? Well, we have to look in terms of Shakespeare’s characters, and how Joker relates to Batman. Joker is Batman’s opposite. He stands for everything Batman stands against, and vice versa.
But, who is Joker? He has no origin (based on original comics, aside from the chemical and “Killing Joke” stories). He, like Shakespeare’s court jesters, is a comedic “clown” who is there to add some light to an otherwise dark play. If Batman is a very dark character like Hamlet, then Joker is obviously the clown who is thrown into the mix as a balance. This is why Joker is Batman’s opposite.
Of course, Joker is a psychotic killer who looks grotesque and like a clown, but you have to admit, every time you see Joker, you can’t help but smile and laugh at how silly the man is, much like the court jester who brings humor to a dark and moody play. If “Batman Begins” was our “Hamlet”, or origin story for Batman, then “The Dark Knight” would have to be about the “clown” who brings humor to a dark and tragic character – Batman. “Batman Begins” didn’t have a lot of humor to it… it was very moody and emotional, and at times, tragic. If Joker is Batman’s complete opposite, then there is no question in my mind that The Joker will be that classic Shakespearean jester who adds some silliness to Denmark.

- TempleFugit



WB1150%20Classic%20Joker.jpg

Take a bow from El Payaso. :up:
 
Most interesting post I have read in a while. But I´d compare Joker more to Shakesperian villains than Jesters. Shakespeare was known to show humanity in his villains, such as Richard III - don´t miss the movie with Ian McKellen - and in that sense it can be compared to The Killing Joke, which looks for the humanity within Joker´s psychotic behavior.
 
Brilliant analysis, good sir. :up:

I hope the Nolans have this kind of stuff in mind, because that's just about exactly the way I want TDK to be like: part Crime Drama, part Shakespearean Tragedy.
 
Thanks for the compliments!

And another thing that got me thinking...

Chris Nolan is quite the englishman, and he's a true class-act, right? Well, in my mind, he obviously must have some knowledge of Shakespeare, and possibly likes it alot. With that in mind, look at "The Prestige". Is this Nolan's way of showing his love for theatre, by showing two magicians ON STAGE, performing an ACT infront of an audience??

If so, perhaps my theory is true, and Nolan will transfer his love for The Bard to "The Dark Knight", and make The Joker, as well as the movie, a "Shakespearean Tragedy".

Just some food for thought. :word:
 
Thanks for the compliments!

And another thing that got me thinking...

Chris Nolan is quite the englishman, and he's a true class-act, right? Well, in my mind, he obviously must have some knowledge of Shakespeare, and possibly likes it alot. With that in mind, look at "The Prestige". Is this Nolan's way of showing his love for theatre, by showing two magicians ON STAGE, performing an ACT infront of an audience??

If so, perhaps my theory is true, and Nolan will transfer his love for The Bard to "The Dark Knight", and make The Joker, as well as the movie, a "Shakespearean Tragedy".

Just some food for thought. :word:

Yeah, we desperately need that here... Someone makes a post about why Batman should wear underpants outside the pants or fins on the batmobile or why the movie sucks because of a detail on the corner of a freeze-frame, turns into a 20-page argument, someone makes a thoughtful analysis, there´s barely a reaction... The boards in a nutshell...
 
Great analysis, TempleFugit. :up:
Tragedy is the best way to go.
bb_to_be_or_not.jpg
 
One element I´d like to add is Shakespeare also often made villains with deformities, which is something common to Batman villains as well, Richard III is a good example again.

Another classic literature character I like to compare to Batman, even though not a Shakespeare one, is Captain Ahab. Like Ahab, Batman is consumed by feelings of revenge and destroying an enemy that can´t really be destroyed. Crime is his white whale - wonder if Alfred is his Ishmael...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"