Fantastic-Boy
Sidekick
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Messages
- 1,976
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
This need be the union between acting,direction and script...
lordofthenerds said:Alba, McMahon, and Gruffud. Gruffud overacted occasionally and didn't seem much like a genius. McMahon was nowhere near menacing enough.
More than half of Washington's scenes were cut from the movie including the scene with Ben at the Kirby gallery.So it's not all her fault.Sentinel X said:Kerry Washington- Shes a really good actress but I was expecting more from her. Maybe its cause she wasn't given much to do with the script but I hope she does better this time
t: Go get em guys.hunter rider said:No JAL acting is a big part of the movie,if those 3 are to be discussed so be it,why can't we talk about the acting ? it's a forum for just that type of thing
hunter rider said:No that's a cop out option so i didn't include it,there's always a weak link and room to improve
TripleF said:Wow, so my opinion along with a few others I see, are um, cop out opinions?
Wow, thanks skippy.

hunter rider said:You been reading Milks posts ? anyway i'll reply to some of the other points later but i just wanted to say to this one that i don't care what names you use or how flippant you are it's naive as hell to think that all 5 actors nailed their roles precicesly,it's just impossible,i loved BB and thought Bale was awesome but i don't think anyone feels that he couldn't improve his delivery as Batman,stop being so defensive and just discuss the topic,if you think they were all magnificent then this thread isn't for fantasy land or you
Don't believe I've met Mr. Milks, so no.You been reading Milks posts ?
flippant you are it's naive as hell

stop being so defensive and just discuss the topic,if you think they were all magnificent then this thread isn't for fantasy land or you
TripleF said:Sorry to sound flippant, better than calling you an ******* or something, and I'm called alot of things, naive isn't one of them.
Has nothing to do with being naive, it is just another way of looking at it. Your poll is automatically biased against those that thought everyone did well. Again, has nothing to do with us being naive, but IMO it has everything to do with you thinking that someone was lacking in their performance. Some of us don't think it was lacking in the performance, but the lines that the actors had to perform. Hence, my need for a "none of the above".![]()
My point is very simple, and several have made it here. I don't believe the performances were bad and warrant improvement, I believe their characters were written badly, and they did the best they could do with the material written. That is why I think that the option that is lacking is the option I would have chosen.
Chiklis 4 choices.
Alba in 5 choices.
Gruffund 5 choices.
Evans 5 choices.
Washington 2 choices.
McMahon 3 choices.
Somewhat uneven as I see it. Mostly in the combinations. (of which I'm not quite sure why you have so many, but ok.)
lol. Well all I can say to that is, take a look in the mirror dude, I can guarantee you the face you see, won't be mine.
Tony Stark said:Every frickin movie that has ever been made has mistakes in it, or things that could be improved on. So who's going to change them? Should they go remake Lawrence of Arabia because it wasn't perfect?
This thread is so frickin' rediculous it isn't even funny.
The fact that people are called "cop outs" for not going with the Monday morning quarterbacks, is just plain pathetic.

hunter rider said:you say this and then...
Contradict yourself
It's all the writers fault that Ioan had no presence or that Julian sounded bored or that a lot felt Jessica conveyed no maturity ? yeah back to my above statement
That's why i gave a "other combination" option
Well unless you have acutally perfected the tech from Face/Off i'd imagine that will be the case but if this was some way of trying to suggest i'm the one in fantasy land b/c i choose not to blame everything on the writers then i point again to the above
