BvS All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion - - - Part 110

[Rorschach2012]

I'm not trying to insult people, but come on. If you're familiar with the canon outside of JL TAS, Hal is the only choice for the main GL.

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

And meanwhile, nobody bats an eye when John Stewart is brought up to be the main Green Lantern. The double standard is idiotic.

John has one great appearance

Carrie has one great appearance

Dude, Carrie has no backstory. None. We know nothing about her life, know nothing about her family, no reason she suited up as Robin other than because. Don't try to compare her to the greatest Green Lantern.

 

[KRYPTON INC.]

We don't know crap. Saying Carrie is a fait accompli at this point is pure cart before horse.

 

[Mad Love]

Some erase this wiki because apparently Carrie Kelley has no backstory.

http://batman.wikia.com/wiki/Carrie_Kelley

http://www.comicvine.com/carrie-kelly/4005-13164/

 

[Rorschach2012]

Levi I like you a lot but I don't take your GL related opinion seriously. Your thoughts on the character are based on JLTAS. That's not a good interpretation of the GL mythology and you know it. JL TAS did a lot right but their GL was weak.

Green Lantern first flight and Green lantern TAS dominate John on JLTAS. No question.

John should be introduced, but as a supporting character, that's the best way to utilize him.

His personality would add nothing to the JL dynamic . His personality would be utterly repetitive. While Hal adds So much to the team dynamic. The Batman/Hal banter will be so much more interesting than Batman/John banter

 

[Charlatan]

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

And this has to do with Batman V Superman because............

 

[SiegePerilous]

I think Carrie has more of a shot of appearing than any other Robin save Grayson, and I kind of prefer it that way honestly. She may have one major story under her belt, but it's way more popular and influential than anything Tim, Jason or Damian have appeared in.

Though I'd prefer a proper Barbara Gordon to any of them.

 

[Mrs. Wayne]

What Levi said.

 

[KillerWolf]

Wasn't there rumor about BvS teaser being tied to Hobbit?

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

But the Tweet mentions Star Wars.........

 

[Mrs. Wayne]

Wasn't there rumor about BvS teaser being tied to Hobbit?

I guess if that tweet is meant to confirm there won't be a BvS teaser in the Hobbit (good) then okay...

 

[Charlatan]

And this has to do with Batman V Superman because............

because the BVS teaser was also rumored to be attached to the Hobbit. Do you think they'd do both huge teasers with the same film? Could this cause WB to wait possibly? Also who died and made you a mod?

 

[KillerWolf]

But the Tweet mentions Star Wars.........

Yeah, but this is what I had in mind:

I guess if that tweet is meant to confirm there won't be a BvS teaser in the Hobbit (good) then okay...

 

[Mad Love]

Movies can only have one trailer in front now?

 

[Rorschach2012]

that'd be so awesome if there was a BvS and a SW7 teaser attached to The Hobbit....

 

[Mrs. Wayne]

That'd be dumb. SW is enough, plus it's coming out next year.

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

Not hating on TASM2 but before the film either before or after the trailers, Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone said to go to like the desk in the front of the theater if you are interested in buying TASM2 on DVD or Blu-Ray and to fill something out for it.

Maybe we will get that type of message before Hobbit but with Ben and Henry saying if you wanna see the trailer to Batman V Superman, you should see *insert upcoming WB movie here*

 

[Wally_West]

I get the feeling that we will get official news regarding the Suicide Squad pretty soon, like before the end of the month is over or at least the first week of December. I say this because the holidays are coming up and Hollywood kind of shuts down during that period and usually we do not hear much news during that time. So I am pretty sure we will be getting news that we all can talk about for months to come!

 

[Mad Love]

That'd be dumb. SW is enough, plus it's coming out next year.

Yeah, it would be soooo dumb for WB to create easy buzz and tickets for their Hobbit movie.

 

[Charlatan]

Movies can only have one trailer in front now?

of course not. but let's not forget why they do this

1. to promote interest in the movie they're running the trailer of. they want huge exposure to the right demographic.

2. to put more butts in the seats to the movie they're running in front of.

Now with SW7 they already have number 2 pretty much covered. so you wouldn't get maximum value out of a BVS teaser

Also the film is so far out from it's release date you wouldn't get that much value from it this early. You might want to save your powder until it can have more punch.

 

[Mrs. Wayne]

Yeah, it would be soooo dumb for WB to create easy buzz and tickets for their Hobbit movie.

Yes... Better to show BvS in front of AOU.

 

[Mad Love]

Yes... Better to show BvS in front of AOU.

Because there can only be 1 trailer for BvS?

 

[Boom]

They're going to wait until The Avengers methinks.

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

They should have the Batman V Superman trailer for Juiptar Accending or whatever the Wachowskis film with Mila and Channing is called.