It's not a stupid cartoon.
It was aimed at children but it still had many concepts worth revisiting. It had elements from Gulliver's Travels
Where exactly? No episode remotely resembles that book.
Fantastic Planet (check out this movie)
Don't know anything about it.
Ummm, they were technically A.I. But nothing was ever made of this in the series, ever. They never took it in that direction.
Transformers predates
Ghost in the Shell by five years.
You could argue any alien film takes from this as it is the quintessential alien film. In fact it basically started the whole alien genre. However, it doesn't really take from WotW at all. WotW was a story about how pockets of humanity reacted to the onslaught of an alien invasion and then were saved by the bacteria of our planet. Transformer's plot doesn't resemble that in the slightest.
Twilight Zone/Outer Limits
Not really. How so? There never were any endings that had a moralistic or ironic plot twist to them.
First one you've gotten right! Pat yourself on the back. The plot to TFTM (1986) was lifted from Star Wars.
Not really. I mean you can draw the comparison, but it's not where the Matrix comes from.
Phillip K Dick novels, Greek mythology, Frankenstein
Well "Autobot Spike" was definitely based on Frankenstein, so that's your second correct guess. As for Greek Mythology. Greek Myth essentially informs all fiction, especially hero based fiction in the United States. So that's not really saying much.
Transformers concept came from G.I.Joe, who had a long standing successful relationship with Marvel. The same team was hired and the same concept - two warring factions - was used. Jim Shooter naming them Autobots and Decepticons respectively.
and a precursor for problems we face in the Iraq War (imperialism/endless civil war).
Imperialism - by that logic any cliche'd supervillain who wants to "take over the world/universe" is drawing a parrallel to imperialism. While that claim may be true in some regard, it hardly makes their action a commentary. Villains typical are shown as having delusions of grandeur, and the easiest way to portray such a delusion is to have them want to try to take over the world.
Endless Civil War - Again, fall flat. Most shows in the eighties and today feature some hero/villain conflict. Transformers is an "endless civil war" where nobody dies (save the Movie), very rarely is there a military aspect to the teams, very rarely is their realistic shoot outs and ground/air tactics. It's a very unrealistic portrayal of war, unlike Gundam or Robotech which sent home the message "war is hell". It was your typical "good v evil" story, where neither side has a particularly deep reason for hating one another. Another classic show/comic cliche'.
A perfect introduction for 8 year olds into the world of sci-fi.
No, you're thinking of Star Wars.
If one wants to elevate Transformers they just need to use the iconic characters and extensive canon to explore these elements.
Well the movie did.
Beast Wars and
Beast Machines certainly elevated the concept, as did IDW, as did Michael Bay. But they elevated a concept which started off in a "stupid toy cartoon". And they elevated that concept through concepts laid down by future franchises - protoforms, sparks, the Allspark, advancing the robot forms, etc.
Pokemon and Hong Kong Phooey are stupid cartoons.
As was Transformers G1, and G.I.Joe, and Ninja Turtles, and many others. Most Transformers are unwatchable by today's audiences. Quiet a few from the third season hold up only because they began to take the series more seriously, writing it like an ongoing story instead of a show that just recycled the same basic plot every episode.