CFlash
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 16, 2006
- Messages
- 3,583
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
That's the problem with what you say, there hasn't. There has been 25 to my current count AT least. Transformers is a toy name brand. Transformers, the show from 1984, is not called Transformers if you want to get technical. It's called Fight! Super Robot Life, and then Transformers: 2010. And if you really want to muck things up Transformers was used by both UK, US, Japanese and Comic continuities of G1, and Infiltration and Dreamwave, and IDW and the audiobook series among others ALL of whom have vastly different continuities.
It's not like Batman where you're building off of roughly the same continuity with roughly the same starting point. Batman is and will always be a story about Bruce Wayne whose parents were murdered senselessly in an alleyway when he was 12 and he dawned a bat costume to avenge them. Transformers isn't that way. Even within G1, even continuities that tie into the show (like War Within) Optimus Prime has had a number of origins...he wasn't even originally a robot named Orion Pax in some of them.
The natural resource plot wasn't even core to every story. The G1 comic, by Budinsky for example, didn't use that. The Transformers left Cybertron to protect from an asteroid shower.
AFAIK Transformers the original cartoon was US produced and written... and ONLY called TRANSFORMERS. All my Transformers comics 1-28 (the last one I ever bought) say TRANSFORMERS. Nothing else. My friends DVDs say TRANSFORMERS. Nothing else. They dont say Headmasters, Beast Wars, Armada, etc. The "Bumblebee & Spike/Buster/whoever" story is the story this movie is trying to tell and recapture... in order to capitalize on a demographic. You know that. You're a smart guy.
I can understand your point-of-view though. As an A-Z expert and fan, this whole TF history is just a huge mish-mush with just one underlying theme to you. Giant Robots!