And the new director of SHIELD is.........

Hawkeye

Civilian
Joined
Apr 28, 2006
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
Points
11
7763425.jpg



:cmad::down
 
Wtf? Seriously, where the hell is Nick Fury during all this Civil War ****.
 
ROFL wow, guess IM is the big dog at Marvel now. When does he become IRON MAN, EATER OF WORLDS?
 
Buh-guyh...?

This bodes...interesting implications about just which side exactly wins the war...
 
Doc Destruction said:
ROFL wow, guess IM is the big dog at Marvel now. When does he become IRON MAN, EATER OF WORLDS?
2 more weeks...then he moves up to Beyonder status.
 
Wtf? What happened to the old one, whatsherface, Hill?
 
Ok so Fury was Director since... Well forever and then he gets replaced with someone for what? A week marvel time? then she gets replaced... by Stark... oy... Am I right so far?
 
You guys are really freaking out.

Alot of Perel's art on his site isn't even for actual books.
 
GNR4Life said:
You guys are really freaking out.

Alot of Perel's art on his site isn't even for actual books.

Well, it could also very well be the case that Iron Man DOES become the new director of S.H.I.E.L.D. But, considering how I think the events of Civil War are going to make Tony Stark a "political embarassment" I'm not sure promoting him to replace Maria Hill would be an ideal situation. Still, you never know.

And for some reason, I can't help think of Zardoz when I see this image (maybe because it looks like the poster from some sci-fi movie from the 70s) Or maybe because Tony Stark bears a passing resemblance to Sean Connery.

7763425.jpg

zardoz.jpg
 
I think Iron Man needs to die a slow horrible death, and Mr Fantastic.:cmad:
 
Interesting.

However I how can Tony be on the Avengers and be SHIELD head?
 
Oh big uproar.:whatever: Tony Stark would be a great director of SHIELD.:o Lots of shared character traits between him and Fury, and Tony's smarter. He's a leader and he'd break the rules a little to get whatever needs to be done, done.:o
 
I seriously doubt Marvel would let Perel post such a thing on his site if it was actually going to happen. Interesting idea though.
 
I must say...I actually sorta like the idea. It would be something quite new for IM, without going totally against the grain of what's happening recently with him.

With that said, I must agree with whoever posted just above me.
 
shouldn't it be tony stark whos the director of SHIELD NOT iron man? i'd think the real board of directors would bar him from acting as i.m for the duration of his directors term
 
That's definitely an odd turn of events. I'm rather indifferent on the subject but it all depends on how things go in the story. Right now most people are split on Civil War, seems like people are split on this as well.
 
3dman27 said:
shouldn't it be tony stark whos the director of SHIELD NOT iron man?

Unless Stark is too busy cloning Hitler and tying heroes to railroad tracks, so someone else is wearing the armor. :rolleyes:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"