I was beyond excited to watch this movie, watching it on Day 1 of it being released on Netflix (my town's theater didn't have it in its limited theatrical release). I knew quite a few people weren't enthusiastic about it, perhaps mostly thinking "another Jungle Book movie?" and being turned off by the animal characters' faces being shown as more human-like. It was intended to be a non-'Disneyfied' take on the Kipling book, and I thought the approach to the animals' facial expressions would be unique in portraying Mowgli's interactions with the non-human characters; but I lowered my expectations, hoping it'd at least be a *good* movie.
I felt it wasn't as good as it could've been, but only because the ending felt slightly anticlimatic. I thought it was a good ending, but it was less exciting for me than the first 88% of the movie - minus the credits. Despite that, there was enough in the movie for it to still be the godsend I wanted to view it as in a movie adaptation faithful to the spirit of the 1890s stories. The blending of the animal actors' faces with their characters', mentioned earlier? I guess you'll either like it or you won't, but it definitely worked for me.
Between this and the 1967 & 2016 movies, this movie hands down has my favorite portrayals of Bagheera and Shere Khan. Bagheera's personality is similar to the mentioned two Disney movies, but alternatively in this movie, he and Mowgli have a much more personal bond. Baloo's interesting to watch as a drill sergeant-type character rather than the Bare Necessities-singing Disney goober. Shere Khan's lameness, absent in the Disney movies, makes him no less menacing; and he doesn't get any more menacing than being voiced by Smaug (I mean, Benedict Cumberbatch).
9.3 / 10 I enjoyed the 2016 movie more, but it mops the floor with the good, but not great 1967 one. Makes me a bit sad that we likely won't have a sequel, but this is better than nothing. Now I can't wait for Andy Serkis's take on Animal Farm.