Anyone else like Michael Gambon better than Richard Harris as Dumbledore?

Lighthouse

Fairness, Equality, Bacon
Joined
Feb 28, 2003
Messages
14,809
Reaction score
2,044
Points
78
After watcthing the two last Potter movies recently, I have to say that I actually like Gambon in the role better than Harris. Don't get me wrong, Harris is a fanstastic actor and I've loved him in many movies. But Gambon brings more intensity and mystery to the role than Harris does. What does everyone else think?
 
I completely agree. Gambon's Dumbledore is much closer to my depiction of the character when I read the novels. Harris played his as sort of a wise old man, which Dumbledore is, of course. But Gambon brings the intensity to the role that the greatest wizard in the world should definitely have. That spark that you sense when reading the books.
 
Hell Yes.
Gambon brings life to Dumbledore. Harris bored me. I know, I know...He was old, but still.
Dumbledore should be an older fellow, but should still act like he's younger than he actually is, and that's what I get from Gambon.
 
Ah yes, Harris VS. Gambon...

I actually don't have a preference of the Dumbledore actors. I can go either way. I actually liked Harris's shattered, whispery voice (no doubt the result of poor health after a lifetime of hard living) which is still the voice I hear when I read the books, but I've got nothing against Gambon. They're both valid to me.
 
i greatly dislike gambon... he just has this... vacant look on his face all the time. he just doesn't llook wise at all. harris has this calm, jedi like quality about him. he was like an actual father figure, gambon just doesn't fit the bill, in my opinion.
 
Sorry but don't agree at all .....

Harris was perfect .... quiet, intense.

Gambon has admitted that he has never even read the books ... and it shows. A scene that springs to mind is just after Harrys name comes out of the Goblet of fire .... Gambon runs in grabs Harry by the arms and starts yelling at him .............. thats NOT Dumbledore!
 
Harris was definitely better, but I like Gambon too.

As somebody said in one of the HP's threads, I think Peter O'Toole would have been a much better choice than Gambon.
 
Dr. Fate said:
Ah yes, Harris VS. Gambon...

Sean Connery vs. Roger Moore
Michael Keaton vs. Christian Bale

It never ends!
 
Catman said:
Sean Connery vs. Roger Moore
Michael Keaton vs. Christian Bale

It never ends!
Don't forget Michael Keaton VS. Val Kilmer

Or Brandon Routh VS. Christopher Reeve

Lion-O VS. He-Man

It really does just go on and on.
 
Richard Harris didn't read any of the books either, and I'm fairly sure Gambon has read PoA, as he said so on the DVD, so if anything, he understands the character more than Harris. As for his GoF role, I don't like his sudden violent behavior in the trophy room any more than most do either, but I digress. I like Gambon better, even though he can be over the top sometimes. He brought more excitement than Harris did, I admit, but lost other traits.

I think the best Dumbledore overall was PoA. He was fantastic. Personally, I thought he hit the nail right on the head. Gambon brought that sense of quirkiness and humor to the character. Richard Harris had the calmness down to a tee, but Gambon has the eccentricity that Harris didn't have. I felt Harris was far too old to be playing Dumbledore. He always made Dumbledore seem breathless, sick, and senile. No disrespect to the actor, but I honestly couldn't imagine him doing what the character does in the later books, like doing breaststrokes. In my opinion, Gambon played a better Dumbledore (mostly in PoA) and did a decent job in setting him for what's to come, though I kinda pictured Harris talking in the astronomy tower when reading HBP, not Gambon. DD may have been nearly butchered because of that little stunt in the trophy room, but I think this was mostly due to the director and the script. I can only hope that the new director will fix this, and I'm very optimistic about him. Yates seems to know what he's doing and has gotten pretty much nearly everything right so far.

I'll admit, however, Harris had stronger presence than Gambon.
 
I've never read any of the books. However, I DO prefer Harris' voice than Gambon. But they're both comanding presense on the screen.

But Gambon was a good replacement. I mean, what else can you do when your actor passes away? They went with the right choice..
 
I think that isnt a question about reading the books or knowing the character. If the script is good and portrays the character right, 50% of the work is done. The other 50% is about the work and the talent of the actor.

Chris reeve never read a superman comic, and he was superman. Sean connery didnt read any ian fleming book, and he was james bond. For posting two examples.
 
showthread.php
 
I prefer Harris. Like somebody said, he was much more calm, and a like a father figure to Harry. Although Gambon's intensity and spring gives the imagery of a great wizard, Harris had more of a commanding presence about him imo.

When reading the books, Harris' Dumbledore springs to mind more than Gambon's.
 
I like both men in the role. I like the sort of patience and kindness that Harris brings to the role and how even though he is quiet he seems so strong. But I like the kind of energy that Gambon brings to him but I think he plays him too 'hard' sometimes, like what livrule said, where he runs at Harrt, grabs him and yells at him. That's not Dumbledore.

In OotP where Dumbledore fights at the Ministry, I can imagine Harris doing that and doing it so well.. I can't imagine Gambom doing it and it feeling like Dumbledore. It's the same for his death scene in HBP, I can't imagine Gambon being Dumbledore then but Harris was so right for it.

Personally, even though he isn't British, I think James Cromwell would have been a better replacement than Gambon.
 
livrule said:
Sorry but don't agree at all .....

Harris was perfect .... quiet, intense.

Gambon has admitted that he has never even read the books ... and it shows. A scene that springs to mind is just after Harrys name comes out of the Goblet of fire .... Gambon runs in grabs Harry by the arms and starts yelling at him .............. thats NOT Dumbledore!

Well, if you didn't like that scene you probably should blame the writer or perhaps director. Gambon is just an actor who does what he's told to do
 
Harris portrayed the calm dumbeldore perfectly, however Gambon portrays the more active and busy Dumbeldore which is what will be needed in the last 3 movies. So they both fit different parts of the role.
 
Gambon was a good replacement especially with more physical scenes in the next two movies for Dumbledore. Gambon was great in PoA, I think it was the director that screwed up Dumbledore in GoF, with the attacking Harry scene.
 
I like Harris' Dumbledore because he played him like he was a wise old patient wizard who waited until the right moment to act. He was like the quite person who never gets in a fight but when he does it could be ugly. Gambon however is always yelling and has this impatient feeling about him. I do agree however that Gambon was great in POA, and that is because of the director. Mike did a pretty good job adapting the story of GOF, but he failed in the character adaption department.
 
Haven't read the novels, but yeah, I enjoy Gambon's performances more.
 
Gambon makes dumbledore look like an a mean *******..

the other guy seems wiser and calm, soothing....
 
I don't know who's better, but the Harry Potter movies Gambon was in are better than the two Harris was in.
 
I vastly prefer Gambon. Harris' take on Dumbledore felt rather generic to me - just another "wizened old wizard." Gambon brought the character a unique flavor.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,162
Messages
21,908,046
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"