A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
The only thing his statements make is that they're not bound by the continuity of the past films; nothing else. Nothing saying we'll get Archangel.
I'll follow him to the ends of the Earth. Though perditions fire, until he breathes blood and rolls over....SPLIT! BROKEN! FINSHED!!!
Even if he could be born earlier because of retconing events in 1973, Apocalypse will take place only 10 years later. At worst, Angel would be a kid in 1983 ! big mistake from Kinberg and SingerI don't understand why people are so against Archangel being in the movie. I feel like it's too early to say what's rumor and what's signed on officially. Bryan is being vague on purpose with the casting.
I personally don't want to see Ben come back. He's too old looking (great actor) to play a younger version of anything. Plus he is very short and doesn't look All-American handsome.