DigificWriter
Superhero
- Joined
- May 4, 2002
- Messages
- 7,692
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 31
I strongly suspect they did kill Waller because of the embargo ( even if its not an absolute embargo, but merely a restriction in usage ). Nonetheless, I applaud. She totally deserved it, sitting their smug in her belief in her own invincible *******ry, only to be killed precisely because there is no point trying to manipulate the compassion of a soulless monster.
Like I said, they could've just not used the character again until the restrictions were lifted (as they will inevitably be).
It's easy to sit there and complain about story decisions being driven or altered by a set of restrictions that were very clearly put in place BY REQUEST, but the argument falls apart when you're dealing with a situation where killing the character really wasn't the only way for the writers to be in compliance with said by-request restrictions, as is the case with this Waller thing.