Batman: Arkham Knight - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
The MP in AO was alright whenever it actually worked but I'm fine with it being removed ,I would have liked Co-OP in free roam though,IF WB Montreal continues making Batman games I'm sure they'd bring the MP back anyway
 
I don't know, WB Montreal didn't work on the multiplayer. It was outsourced. If they do it again, it'll probably be outsourced again. But, I don't think Splash Damage should get the call again.

I'm just happy I don't have to grind myself into the ground for those MP trophies in Arkham Knight.
 
I adore Timm's Harley. But that design doesn't work outside BTAS universe. Unfortunately. They had to move on.
I'm not seeing how. She's modeled after a harlequin, and ever since the redesigns every artist has been moving further and further away from those roots.

Why does everyone else get to keep their outlandish aesthetic but it's the female character who has to be sexed up?
 
It looks like they modeled Harley's face after Tara Strong in the cinematic trailer.

I can kind of see it.

Tara%20Strong-WBU-019265.jpg
 
I've played Arkham Origins twice and I haven't even gone near the multiplayer aspect.

I actually think the hype for this game would have been ten times bigger had Arkham Origins not been released. WB should have held off and released prequel games after Rocksteady was finished.

It's not as if Origins blew up in terms of critical or commercial success.
 
I agree.. while I enjoyed Origins it wasn't needed really and it came out at the tail end of the generation... Now knowing that Arkham Knight will release in 2014 Origin's release seems even more... Odd.
 
Not sure it really affected the Hype that much, everyone I saw on the internet said:
"No Rocksteady, Not Really Arkham"
 
when are we getting gameplay footage?
 
Which I think is fairly silly too. It's a good game and I wouldn't be shocked if WBM took over after this one (unless RS gives us a Justice League game.. Which I wouldn't be shocked to see.)

Games worth playing but not entirely needed. Far from bad.
 
Rocksteady has said no to a Superman game before and so okay but did they give reasons why they aren't interested in that character for a solo game?
 
I've played Arkham Origins twice and I haven't even gone near the multiplayer aspect.

I actually think the hype for this game would have been ten times bigger had Arkham Origins not been released. WB should have held off and released prequel games after Rocksteady was finished.

It's not as if Origins blew up in terms of critical or commercial success.


The multiplayer sucks in Origins. Don't worry Arkham Knight will totally get the momentum needed due to the involvement of Rocksteady being at the helm. The new cgi cinematic trailer alone has set the bar high in social media (the tweets, facebook, google etc..) is buzzing like crazy with Batman: Arkham Knight and the fact we get to drive the Batmoblie.
 
Rocksteady has said no to a Superman game before and so okay but did they give reasons why they aren't interested in that character for a solo game?

other then sayin they have no interest in doing so, no . they would just say they weren't interested and would leave it at just that and moved to other question asked to them.
 
IF WB ever loses Rocksteady and RS teamed with Marvel and another publisher..What Marvel character would you like for them to try in a solo game?
 
IF WB ever loses Rocksteady and RS teamed with Marvel and another publisher..What Marvel character would you like for them to try in a solo game?

Dare devil if it were me, or may be heroes for hire. since there will be a tv show with iron fist and luke cage. but I think they need their own ip.
 
hmm spidey is fine . iron man yeah he needs one. they should still do their own ip. which I think is more likely of them you never know.
 
I wonder what RS's own IP would be like,Their own created super hero/a shooter/a RPG/an open world action game similar to GTA or Just Cause?

They have the potential to go in so many routes
 
IF WB ever loses Rocksteady and RS teamed with Marvel and another publisher..What Marvel character would you like for them to try in a solo game?

They won't, WB has invested shares in Rocksteady. If they do non Batman game it will be Superman or a JL game.
 
they may break away from superheroes to show they have other interest and talents beside's super hero stuff. may being the operative word here.

it's not like wb doesn't have other interest besides super heroes and Rocksteady has said they have pull like when they delayed with a arkham title to polish it. if they want to do something else they will. It's why they are saying their done with the Arkham series.
 
Last edited:
IF Rocksteady is done with Batman Arkham but sticking with WB then I think their next game should be their own IP then do a JL game after it
 
they can do what they want they earned it so what ever chose they make is fine. if most studio's were given the same chance's they were, also in how they want to do thing's the industry would be better for it as well as long as they are making their games awesome or better.
 
IF WB ever loses Rocksteady and RS teamed with Marvel and another publisher..What Marvel character would you like for them to try in a solo game?

Captain America, the could basically do an Arkham like gameplay .
 
Moon Knight

you know what just do a a marvel knights game and it'd help them to be come familiar with similar to the story campaign, separate but optional co-op .

Which will benefit them. If people keep wanting TMNT out of them. Rock steady needs the experience they have to start to learn how to make that work for them selves at some point, if people really want that.

even though Rock steady said they were never ever doing that when the rumor was around as they said.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"