The Dark Knight Batman Begins Sequel Art

[Yurka]

She was ok in the first one, but she went downhill very fast, and her character got very old, real quick.

how does this...

turn into this...

 

[MAKIEVELLI]

how does this...

turn into this...

AGREED. Dunst was ok in the Spider-Man movies, The hottest I've ever seen her was in the cafeteria scene in Part 1, then she just went downhill. I remember thinking that someone who looks like James Franco could do a lot better than her.

 

[strikezone89]

james franco as mary jane =HOTT

 

[dchisholm]

batman begins sequel art??!?!

 

[TheSpyAssassin]

wow....can we please stop bashing Maggie Gyllenhaal??

 

[Kaizer]

Does every heroes love-interest have to be a supermodel? can't natural beauty and charm be a factor anymore? geez.... anyways, I think Maggie's alot better than Katie

 

[Crook]

Personality and charm can only go so far..

 

[TheSpyAssassin]

Maggie Gyllenhaal is a far much better actress than katie Holmes. I prefer watching Maggie over Katie any day.

 

[strikezone89]

wow....can we please stop bashing Maggie Gyllenhaal??

HONESTLY SHE'S NOT THAT UGLY

 

[TheSpyAssassin]

HONESTLY SHE'S NOT THAT UGLY

I agree, plus i think she looks much better when you see her in a movie than pictures.

 

[dchisholm]

art?!?

 

[DV8]

HONESTLY SHE'S NOT THAT UGLY

and with that, we rest our case . . . when you have to defend a movie-star's hotness (I agree the girl is a decent actor, but not really that hot; MUCH less hot than Katie) by saying "SHE'S NOT THAT UGLY", what's really left to argue

 

[DeaDheaD]

Holmes just looks like she 15, she seems like someone that needs a guy like Tom to tell her what to do and when to do it,she has that high maintenence look to her, like shes still a little princess, Maggie looks like a woman, whom can take care of herself

 

[regwec]

I don't think I'm a misogynist, and I certainly try not to be, but I couldn't take Katie Holmes at all seriously as an incarnation of jurisprudence. I don't think her femininity is the rub; I would reject Stephen Segal, as well.

Maggie seems a lot more feasible. To those who launch invective against her appearance, I ask you what you percieve to be the corrolation between supermodel looks and intellectualism.

Except for me, of course.






Hmm.

 

[FCEEVIPER]

Im not bashing her, shes a great actress and will do a much better job than Katie IMO,


but shes ugly.

Ditto.

edit: never mind
here's my current wallpaper (just something i made really quick, nothing special)

Well done.

how does this...

turn into this...

Yeah that made no sense whatsoever!

She is NOT Jane, imo.

 

[FCEEVIPER]

edit.

 

[FCEEVIPER]

I don't think I'm a misogynist, and I certainly try not to be, but I couldn't take Katie Holmes at all seriously as an incarnation of jurisprudence. I don't think her femininity is the rub; I would reject Stephen Segal, as well.

Maggie seems a lot more feasible. To those who launch invective against her appearance, I ask you what you percieve to be the corrolation between supermodel looks and intellectualism.

Except for me, of course.

Your way too intelligent to waste your time on these boards.

 

[StarvingArtist]

I don't think I'm a misogynist, and I certainly try not to be, but I couldn't take Katie Holmes at all seriously as an incarnation of jurisprudence. I don't think her femininity is the rub; I would reject Stephen Segal, as well....
Hmm.

Steven Segal as Rachel Dawes.......you may be on to something sir

 

[TheBat812]

Alright, here's basically the final version of this. I had it done last week, but dont have steady access to a computer right now. This is basically what i think we'll see for Joker.

If anybody has teh artistic talent to make his hair look slicked back and put him in the suit we've seen from spy pics, I think we'd get a very good look at what our Joker will look like.

 

[Ender Durden]

do we fer sure know that ledger has panda eyes?

cuz when i first saw the official pic i just assumed it was just the shadows from the angle of the light

 

[itsthebatman]

I don't think I'm a misogynist, and I certainly try not to be, but I couldn't take Katie Holmes at all seriously as an incarnation of jurisprudence. I don't think her femininity is the rub; I would reject Stephen Segal, as well.

Maggie seems a lot more feasible. To those who launch invective against her appearance, I ask you what you percieve to be the corrolation between supermodel looks and intellectualism.

Except for me, of course.

Hmm.

Except for you what?
One couldn't take Katie Holmes seriously because she looked like a first year law student, not a seasoned lawyer. That was a definite problem. No air of gravitas about her.

 

[TheBat812]

do we fer sure know that ledger has panda eyes?

cuz when i first saw the official pic i just assumed it was just the shadows from the angle of the light

He definitely has blackened eye shadow. Havent you seen the IMAX pic? It's pretty clear that it's there.

 

[dchisholm]

so here is another one i did yesterday. my friend with the scanner is being sort of flaky--he's getting married on saturday, so it's understandable.
i took them with my camera phone and tried to adjust the levels on a basic program.

detail shot:

hope you like! hopefully i'll have a higher quality version up soon!

 

[TheBat812]

that looks incredible, love the style!

 

[dchisholm]

that looks incredible, love the style!

thanks, champ!