Batman vs Superman - World's Finest

We're done with Joker for a while in Batman films. I think it should be someone else of his villains.

Agree with you there...
 
I think it would be a great idea to have a film with both heroes. As said above it would make the most sense to do this before a JL movie.
 
Batman vs Supes would be awesome

tumblr_lpfel9iufJ1qjr6llo1_1280.jpg
 
Batman/Superman film being quietly developed.

We'll see. DC needs to get their act together.

I love all things Batman he's one of fiction's greatest characters. Superman on the other hand I could never get into. Oddly enough the only time I like Superman is when he interacts with Batman. Their dichotomy and interactions make for some great stories. So with that said, I would welcome a World's Finest movie with the two of them.
 
Why would one have to mentor the other?
 
I used to be against this idea before but for some reason I like it more now. I think it could come before a Justice League movie because of logistics. It seems like more of a sure bet and it's introducing the idea of DC superheroes teaming up.

I find it hard to see Bale agreeing to this, but this could be an opportunity to introduce a new Batman actor and take on Batman.

I see this mentor idea working better if Bale is still on it. Even then, it could just be about Batman and Superman learning to work together, not one mentoring the other. Though if Superman goes to Gotham then Batman would have to show him the ropes in some way.
 
Last edited:
Essentially, they're hoping they can woo Christian Bale back into the cape-and-cowl for a fourth time...
So I guess Batman turns out alright at the end of TDKR.
 
From AICN Aug 08, 2001:
WORLD'S FINEST - Batman & Superman Film to be Directed By DAS BOOT fella - Wolfgang Petersen!!!

From AICN Aug 12, 2001:
Casting RUMOR about who would play Superman in the Wolfgang Petersen film WORLD'S FINEST

From AICN Jul 11, 2002:
MTV.COM Gets Petersen To Spill More BATMAN VS. SUPERMAN Details!!
From MTV Jul 10 2002:
'Batman Vs. Superman' Director Hints At What To Expect From Superhero Struggle - Caped Crusader, Man of Steel expected to do battle on big screen in 2004.
Ryan J. Downey said:
In what could be the biggest cinematic battle since King Kong wrestled Godzilla in 1962's "Kingukongu tai Gojira," the Caped Crusader will square off against the Man of Steel in "Batman vs. Superman."

"[It's] never happened before," said Wolfgang Petersen, who plans to direct (or is that referee?) the movie. "You had it in some of the comic books, but never on the big screen. They're so different. ... It sets up great material for drama."

Petersen's no stranger to drama, as the German-born director helmed "Air Force One" and "In the Line of Fire." He's now working on a story by "Seven" scribe Andrew Kevin Walker that pits the two iconic heroes against each other during a time of crisis. And though Petersen is reluctant to spill many secrets, he has promised that "Batman vs. Superman" will contain villains, lots of action and absolutely no Robin.

"I cannot tell you what really gets them together. I can say that much of [the conflict] is because of the different philosophies that they represent," the director said. "Superman represents sort of everything clear and bright and noble. He represents our hopes and ideals. Batman, on the other hand, represents the dark and obsessive and vengeful side.

"The plot is structured in a way that these two very different sides basically of the same coin have to clash at some point because they handle situations totally differently. ... For a large portion of the thing they are at each other's throats. But then, of course, because they are both crime fighters, they join forces again and fight evil."

Petersen, who has yet to cast anyone, said he wants serious actors and not action stars to assume the title roles.

"We have a script that really very, very much concentrates on the characters," he said. "It's really material for two great actors."

Though he mentioned Matt Damon in an interview with Variety, Petersen said he only cited the "Bourne Identity" star as an example of what he's talking about — "Someone where we so far did not really think of as a big action hero [who] turned out be a great actor who can also do great action. ... He's one of these kind of guys, but there's a lot of these guys out there."

And a lot of guys, including Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer and George Clooney, have previously portrayed Batman on the big screen. Christopher Reeve, of course, played Superman in four well-known films. Petersen said "Batman vs. Superman" will steer clear of the conventions laid down in each film series, though he admitted some degree of influence from the DC Comics series "World's Finest."

"I love [the Batman and Superman films] very, very much," Petersen said. "Especially in both cases the first two. I saw them over and over again. ... ['Batman vs. Superman'] is part of the lore of the Superman films and the Superman comics and the same with Batman, but it's also different. First of all, the dynamics are different because if they are in one movie together it changes a lot of things and it gives you a new perspective on superheroes. ... You have also the look and feel of Metropolis, the bright golden city, and the feel of Gotham, which is a shadowy, sinister city, in the same movie. This is Superman/Batman of the time after September 11th, also. It takes place in today or tomorrow's world."

"Batman vs. Superman" has long been one of many projects involving the two titans in development at Warner Bros., which owns the rights to all of DC Comics' heroes. The "Superman Lives" project, which had Tim Burton ("Batman"), Nicolas Cage and Kevin Smith ("Clerks") all attached at various times, has long been dormant. But a spokesperson for Darren Aronofsky ("Requiem for a Dream") has confirmed the filmmaker's plans to make "Batman: Year One." There is also a "Catwoman" flick in the works with Ashley Judd in the lead role, and there's talk of a live-action movie based on the "Batman Beyond" cartoon (see ).

Although those movies — as well as other comic-inspired flicks like "Daredevil" (see ) and "The Punisher" (see "Punisher Is Next Comic Hero Headed For Big Screen") — have received a boost in the buzz department thanks to the $400 million box office success of "Spider-Man," Petersen said "Batman vs. Superman" will be very different from Tobey Maguire's record-breaking blockbuster.

" 'Spider-Man' has a very sweet and light touch to it and is very romantic with Kirsten Dunst and Tobey," Petersen said. "Ours will be more dramatic. What 'Spider-Man' did quite good was the swinging Spider-Man through New York. Our thing, with Superman flying, will be an unbelievable, amazing new experience that you've never, ever seen before, because it's a long time ago with the 'Superman' films."

Petersen is eyeing a 2004 release for "Batman vs. Superman."

From AICN Jul 24, 2002:
Gigolo Joe as SUPERMAN -- Bullseye as BATMAN!!!

From AICN Aug 12, 2002:
Why Jude Law Left Warners' BATMAN VS SUPERMAN And Who Replaced Him!

From AICN Apr 08, 2003:
So what did Alan Horn have to say about THE MATRIX, SUPERMAN, BATMAN and SUPERMAN VS BATMAN'
 
What about a story with both Batman and Clark Kent investigating Intergang? Batman could first gain knowledge of them after Gotham's crimelords Penguin and Black Mask start dealing with them. This could be used as an introduction to Darksied and a Justice League movie.
 
After Man of Steel, and a future reboot of Batman, this is the next step for the two biggest DC heroes.
How many sequels should MOS have first, before this one? No more than one, I suggest.

And the new take on Bats, whatever they call it, will do just fine with ONE film and no sequels.
 
Last edited:
How about we just skip the Bat reboot and jump into this with a new Batman? Like a soft reboot.
 
Libidoloca: No, I think I want to establish a new Batman before that. A Caped Crusader named one
 
What's wrong with Caped Crusader??

Anyway, I agree that this should precede yea even lead into a JL film. It will most likely be superior because it won't be bogged down introducing or putting in contact 5-10 characters. It's much easier to manage two relationships than 16. In short, it's much easier to do right.

That said, Joker and Lex Luthor are bad ideas. The reason I don't like these storylines is that they never challenge Superman. It's hard to imagine it without Lex though, since he works as a villain for both, but in movie terms, he will either be exhausted or not yet introduced when this comes out.

I would suggest a superman villain that Batman can defeat and a Batman villain that is a challenge for Superman. Hard to find, I know, but Bizzaro is a great character Batman can break down with logic and Kryptonite, and works great as a flunkie to almost any of Batman's foes. Mr. Freeze or Poison Ivy have the biology background necessary, and both can, potentially, fell the Man of Steel. Poison Ivy, especially has the skill to pit the two heroes against each other.

Or you could split the difference and do Vandal Savage and Solomon Grundy. Or split it further and just do a simplified streamlined Darkseid.
 
While I agree with not having the Joker and Luthor as the main advesaries,I wouldn't mind President Luthor being somehow descreetely connected to which ever main villain(s) in more of a plot twist/cameo role .
 
i hope worlds finest happens as a sequel to MoS, dc should reboot the movie universe thru supes
 
What's wrong with Caped Crusader??

Anyway, I agree that this should precede yea even lead into a JL film. It will most likely be superior because it won't be bogged down introducing or putting in contact 5-10 characters. It's much easier to manage two relationships than 16. In short, it's much easier to do right.

That said, Joker and Lex Luthor are bad ideas. The reason I don't like these storylines is that they never challenge Superman. It's hard to imagine it without Lex though, since he works as a villain for both, but in movie terms, he will either be exhausted or not yet introduced when this comes out.

I would suggest a superman villain that Batman can defeat and a Batman villain that is a challenge for Superman. Hard to find, I know, but Bizzaro is a great character Batman can break down with logic and Kryptonite, and works great as a flunkie to almost any of Batman's foes. Mr. Freeze or Poison Ivy have the biology background necessary, and both can, potentially, fell the Man of Steel. Poison Ivy, especially has the skill to pit the two heroes against each other.

Or you could split the difference and do Vandal Savage and Solomon Grundy. Or split it further and just do a simplified streamlined Darkseid.

As far as the "Caped Crusader" title, I'm not sure exactly why. I think it's that "The Caped Crusader" lacks the gravitas of "The Dark Knight" in my opinion.
 
Godzilla 2014: Batman is referred to as both The Dark Knight and The Caped Crusader. Nolan used one of these nicknames for his version of Batman. Why can't the other be used as well, for another reboot? Is it because Caped Crusader was used in the 60s series?
I don't think Caped Crusader would only be campy and Adam West-esque.
 
As far as the "Caped Crusader" title, I'm not sure exactly why. I think it's that "The Caped Crusader" lacks the gravitas of "The Dark Knight" in my opinion.

I agree, the Caped Crusader doesn't fit the more gritty versions of Batman, but one part of his characterization that shouldn't be lost is that he's a very intellectual educated adventurer. He can't always, or truly be the kind of blue collar psychotic that's in vogue in this particular era.
 
The Caped Crusader is associated with Adam West...but you can easily associate it with something else. Call it TCC, and punch out with a darker meaning to it. Cause a Crusader is a fighter for good, during the dark ages...get my drift? :)
 
i mean it would be just like movies nowadays were you just add or remove a word to make it a diff movie e.g. fast & furious
 
The Caped Crusader is associated with Adam West...but you can easily associate it with something else. Call it TCC, and punch out with a darker meaning to it. Cause a Crusader is a fighter for good, during the dark ages...get my drift? :)
Yes, one can easily create a darker meaning for it. And a Batman film called Caped Crusader would just sound COOL.

It's not like the film is called The Boy Wonder and have Robin in it. Forget about that for now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"