BvS Batman's Voice Thread

Listening to it, I honestly don't think they need that robot effect on the voice; it sounds like it would have been pretty perfect on its own. However, I'm okay with it as long as they make some reference to Batman using some sort of voice changer in his suit. It doesn't really make sense since his mouth isn't covered, but eh. I can't suspend disbelief.

As long as it doesn't sound like Stephen Amell's goofy altered voice on Arrow, we're good. :D
 
Listening to it, I honestly don't think they need that robot effect on the voice; it sounds like it would have been pretty perfect on its own. However, I'm okay with it as long as they make some reference to Batman using some sort of voice changer in his suit. It doesn't really make sense since his mouth isn't covered, but eh. I can't suspend disbelief.

As long as it doesn't sound like Stephen Amell's goofy altered voice on Arrow, we're good. :D

I'm sure at some point the film will briefly allude to the tech, yeah. The mic and speakers are obviously embedded within the cowl's itself I should think. Given that this is a Batman for our real world, it could be using nano-tech for all we know.
 
So the people that don't have a surround sound, or want to enjoy this when it comes out on Blu-ray won't be able to fully realize the quality of his bat-voice? I myself won't be affected since I have a pretty decent audio setup, but creating a voice that can only be enjoyed by those that have superior sound systems sounds like a bad idea.

I'm sure this WILL sound amazing in larger format theaters, but what about during repeated viewings on a smaller format?
 
That's a valid concern, but I do understand the logic behind that. When I first saw TDKR in the theater, I was blown away by how awesome Bane's voice sounded. Once I bought the movie and watched it at home though, it didn't sound as cool. But in the theater? Oh hell yes. So yeah, it's a shame that it likely won't have the same effect unless you have surround sound in your living room. But that doesn't change the experience you have seeing it in the theater.
 
So the people that don't have a surround sound, or want to enjoy this when it comes out on Blu-ray won't be able to fully realize the quality of his bat-voice? I myself won't be affected since I have a pretty decent audio setup, but creating a voice that can only be enjoyed by those that have superior sound systems sounds like a bad idea.

I'm sure this WILL sound amazing in larger format theaters, but what about during repeated viewings on a smaller format?


I don't think that's what anyone is suggesting. We're just remarking that it sounds better and more befitting of that scene when played through some kind of surround sound system, as you get more of the "full effect". That's not to say that the voice automatically sounds bad when played through your laptop or phone, but obviously that's not the way that ANY aspect of the film itself is truly meant to be seen or heard.

I mean, it's true that some general sound elements (and aspects of sound mixing for films) are lost, or not fully realized, when played back on some kind of smaller format device, which is sad but also unavoidable. That much can be said of nearly any film, to some extent. You play back The Dark Knight Rises on your laptop and you miss out on getting the full effect of many of the sound effects, the booming beats of the musical score, the full effect of hearing every nuance of Bane's voice, explosions, etc.

A BvS example I can point to is actually the very first teaser trailer. If you watch that on your laptop, what you hear at the start of the trailer are the voiceovers by different characters and news people giving their varying opinions on Superman. But when I saw that in the theater for the IMAX, each line of dialogue from those voices came from a different part of the theater, from the left side, right side, behind the audience, etc. It was like the characters were standing on each side of the theater, divided, and arguing about Superman's place in society and what he stands for -- which was a very cool effect that is pretty much lost when playing it on your phone or laptop.

My point is that, no matter what, all sound elements from films are enhanced in the theater or with a home surround sound system. It's virtually unavoidable. When you choose to watch something through a smaller format, everything from the picture to sound will be exactly that -- smaller.

In regard to Batfleck's voice, hearing it through he crisper, clearear, and louder format will certainly give it a bit of a different effect -- especially if they tinker with its modulation throughout the film. Reverb and echo/delay effects, for instance, will be more pronounced, as will the background sounds and musical score.

I also feel like we should probably wait to hear more than one line in context -- whether it be during the theater experience or via smaller format -- before declaring the voice a resounding success or a dumb, bone-headed mistake.
 
Listening to it, I honestly don't think they need that robot effect on the voice; it sounds like it would have been pretty perfect on its own. However, I'm okay with it as long as they make some reference to Batman using some sort of voice changer in his suit. It doesn't really make sense since his mouth isn't covered, but eh. I can't suspend disbelief.

As long as it doesn't sound like Stephen Amell's goofy altered voice on Arrow, we're good. :D
I think they could leave out the robotic effect but just boot the bass to his voice a tad and make sure it comes out strong rather than just a whisper.
 
^^Exactly! I don't mind the manipulation but I don't like Batman to sound like he's talking into a fan.
 
So what's up in the last TV spot? His voice had a hint of the modulation, but no cowl anywhere to be seen.
 
There's definitely some modulation being applied when Affleck is in costume. It might just be a bit subtler than we thought.
 
People still complaining about the voice? You guys are never happy, are you?
 
Watched the spot with headphones: there is definitely no modulation on his voice there. Comparing it to the batvoice in tv spot 1, I think the effect is subtler than we initially thought. Sounds like there just boosting it and dropping the pitch slightly.

[YT]watch?v=_peXtNpuIJs[/YT]

[YT]watch?v=aUN0F5wKbGE[/YT]
 
It was odd.

Maybe that's just Ben.

It absolutely is all Ben, and my first impressions hearing that line from the last trailer was right; that's Ben's "angry Bruce" voice.

And considering how everyone had the impression it was a Batman line, I'm even more disappointed with this modulation nonsense. That delivery was right on the money and I could buy it as Batman.

Moreover it sounds nothing like his public Bruce persona (from his exchange with Clark), so the identity card isn't to be debated.

I hope this is corrected in the future, they can easily explain it away because Batman is now in the limelight and is "revealed" to simply be a man. Ben's natural voice is clearly fine for the part.
 
^ it doesn't need to be "corrected" just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's wrong and needs correcting. You're allowed not to like it that's fine, some like it some don't. But to say stuff like it being corrected indicates it's wrong which makes it sound like your opinion is some sort of fact.
 
Yup, knowing finally that it's Bruce who says it makes me wish we didn't have the modulation at all. That voice is absolutely perfect for Bats. But for now, I'll live.
 
I'm starting to wonder if "Batman", rather than being more intense...is actually supposed to be colder, calmer, to mask Bruce Wayne's intensity and emotion. That'd be an interesting dynamic.
 
^ it doesn't need to be "corrected" just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's wrong and needs correcting. You're allowed not to like it that's fine, some like it some don't. But to say stuff like it being corrected indicates it's wrong which makes it sound like your opinion is some sort of fact.
I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt that people here are big boys and know every post reflects an individual's opinion. Nothing wrong with the usage, no more than using something like "improved". They're common choice adjectives for subjective points of view.
 
I'm starting to wonder if "Batman", rather than being more intense...is actually supposed to be colder, calmer, to mask Bruce Wayne's intensity and emotion. That'd be an interesting dynamic.

You're kind of describing comic Batman :hmr:
 
From Deborah Snyder in the new Empire mag:
"Batman's voice is digitally altered by the cowl."
There's your explanation. Makes you wonder if he fits the tech cowl under the regular cowl.
 
I loved Ben's voice in the last TV spot and it made me dislike the digital modulation even more. We obviously don't need it for Ben as he can clearly be Batman without it. That scene with Alfred proved it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"