Beat from X2 vs. Beast from X3.

F

fuelburningorac

Guest
Personally I thought the Beast from X3 was way better. Although they only used the Beast just in the back ground of X2, I think the blue beast is the true beast.
 
What the F are you talking about. Whos "Beat"?
 
fuelburningorac said:
Personally I thought the Beast from X3 was way better. Although they only used the Beast just in the back ground of X2, I think the blue beast is the true beast.
Really because I enjoyed the guy who got half a line on the television screen a lot better :rolleyes:
 
Beat vs Beast...

tough choice.
Beat never really did much in x2 but sit in some chair and talk... although he did have nice hair and tie. well I'll go with Beast for this since he actually does something in the story and is fuzzy and blue.
 
Ooops typed to fast for my own good. I'm just saying fur vs. skin beast. Me, I like the fur beast.
 
sonicphoto said:
Dude in X2 he was still not mutant.


IF you are saying here that Beast was not a mutant in X-2, then you are wrong he was a mutant in X-2 since he was a mutant since the day he was born, he just wasn't the bouncing blue furry beast that a lot of people know.
 
Did Beast look like Kelsey Grammer when he was given the cure or did he look like the black haired guy on tv in X-2 who was called Hank McCoy? Or was he completely fine with the way he was & didn't take the cure?
 
He was actually in X1, but the problem was Charles introduces beast as a long time lobier for mutants rights, and beast confirms this in x3, since "before you got your claws" or something like that to wolverine, But if that's so then who was hank Mc Coy in x1? :P The actor was Steve Backic (from Andromedia)


Edit*** x2.. i mean .. yeah that's it
 
Wow this is a close one.


I think Beast in X3 takes it for being a slightly nicer shade of blue.
 
beast9gm.png
 
I LOVED the guy on the TV screen for 8 seconds much more than Kelsey Grammar's fully fleshed out near-spot-on performance.

Need you even axe such a beatly question?
 
Duh. X3 Beast, hands down.
 
Maybe he changed in between the movies, like they did in X-Men Evolution where he used a formula to prevent him from getting furry and blue. By the tie the movie is around, the formula no longer works, and he just accepts his current form. They could have done something like that, but I don't think the writers thought along those lines.
 
Sasquatch said:
I LOVED the guy on the TV screen for 8 seconds much more than Kelsey Grammar's fully fleshed out near-spot-on performance.

Need you even axe such a beatly question?

Okay, I deserve the flame for spelling error in the title. I just heard some people commenting in the theater that the Beast shouldn't have had all the blue fur. I wasn't sure if they were referring to continuity or just the original Beast.
 
fuelburningorac said:
Okay, I deserve the flame for spelling error in the title. I just heard some people commenting in the theater that the Beast shouldn't have had all the blue fur. I wasn't sure if they were referring to continuity or just the original Beast.

Although Beast didn't always have blue fur in the comics, a film version without just would not be the same.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"