I liked Michael Shannon's Zod, as I felt he captured the character's obsession well and felt like a legitimate menace (as distinct from Stamp's somewhat campy Zod).
I wonder if the success of these three villains is more about the fact that they are great characters in their own right or that they have been portrayed by superb actors ?
The Joker is an iconic character who symbolizes chaos and madness,
he's really not that complex a character because the only thing certain about him is .....well, uncertainty.
He's the antithesis of Batman - so really he's interesting for what he reveals about the hero.
Magneto is a guy who I've always thought deserved his own stories, because he's more complicated and as the X-Men's regular "frenemy" I've always felt he added more to their stories (well, more than the Joker adds to Batman).
I have always found Magneto a really compelling character - which I attribute to his backstory, really a bit of writing genius (from Chris Claremont, I think).
He's that rare villain with whom we can sympathize (despite abhorring his methods). Magneto is a monster, who's contemplated genocide - which I guess is part of
the irony of his character, that as a near-victim of genocide he's now willing to commit it to prevent it. Complex and compelling.
I suppose if DC killed off the Joker permanently, I could live with that (in fact, I've often thought that at some point it has to happen) - but I would be very sad to hear of a permanent end to Magneto. In some ways I see the Joker as replaceable, in that another colourful maniac who's obsessed with Batman could come along. But Magneto's a bit more than that.
Anyway, this is just me rambling. As for Loki, I've never really had a lot of time for him in the comics, although he's a good character - kind of epitomizes the utterly self-serving bad-guy. Probably my favorite panel in a Thor book is when Odin, Thor and Loki confront Surtur, who's out to destroy the universe:
Odin cries "For Asgard!" Thor shouts "For Midgard!" and of course Loki "For myself !"
I've never rated him as highly as either the Joker or Magneto, but he certainly is one of Marvel comics' great villains, and by far the best Marvel cbm villain. Hiddleston (supported by good writing) has really elevated the character - I must admit I haven't kept track of Thor stories recently, but I know that in the 2000s Thor writers have given him (and her) good service.
Nice little paraphrasing of "Horatius at the Bridge."
To my mind, the other great Marvel villains - Red Skull and Dr Doom have never been done Justice ( I blame the writing in TFA - because Hugo Weaving is great with villains, as for Doom, well in the first 2 FF films I blame casting as Julian McMahon was a whiny ***** as Doom, and in FF 2015, well....the less said about Dr Doom the better).
I mean, how hard is it to get Dr Doom right ? He's a mad scientist who hates Reed Richards, wears an iron mask, and refers to himself in the 3rd person.
I love that last bit, because it's unintentionally hilarious, especially when he refers to himself and uses CAPITAL LETTERS !
"But time is endless...as is my hatred! When he least expects it, when he's most unprepared; Doom will strike again!!"
I mean, that stuff just used to make me laugh and laugh. I love Doom, because while he's despciable and tragic, at the same time he's really (unintentionally ) funny. I always thought the FF writers played that aspect of him for laughs. And of course, often his hatred of Reed, arrogance and ambition are the very reasons why he fails. Sheldon Cooper (in the early BBT seasons) is kind of the sesame street-G rated version of Dr Doom (minus the mask).
Is that so hard to get right ? I mean, if they can make Loki such a great onscreen villain, why not Doom ?